search for: vhost_dsp_ept

...+ sizeof(dsp->posn)); + if (nbytes != sizeof(dsp->posn)) + vq_err(iter.vq, "%s(): added %zd instead of %zu bytes\n", + __func__, nbytes, sizeof(dsp->posn)); + + ret = vhost_rpmsg_finish_unlock(&dsp->vrdev, &iter); +} + +static const struct vhost_rpmsg_ept vhost_dsp_ept[] = { + { + .addr = SOF_RPMSG_ADDR_IPC, + .read = vhost_dsp_ipc_read, + .write = vhost_dsp_ipc_write, + }, { + .addr = SOF_RPMSG_ADDR_POSN, + .read = vhost_dsp_posn_read, + .write = NULL, /* position updates are sent from a work-queue */ + }, { + .addr = SOF_RPMSG_ADDR_DATA, + .read = vhost...

...* not, we might as well perform all allocations when registering the > > + * misc device. > > + */ > > + dsp->active = false; > > + dsp->posn_addr = -EINVAL; > > + dsp->posn.rhdr.error = -ENODATA; > > + > > + vhost_rpmsg_init(&dsp->vrdev, vhost_dsp_ept, ARRAY_SIZE(vhost_dsp_ept)); > > + vhost_work_init(&dsp->posn_work, vhost_dsp_send_posn); > > + > > + /* Overwrite file private data */ > > + filp->private_data = dsp; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > [...] > > > +/* Always called...

This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be highly appreciated too! Thanks Guennadi [1]

This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be highly appreciated too! Thanks Guennadi [1]