search for: vhost_dsp

...t; +#include <linux/spinlock.h> +#include <linux/vhost.h> +#include <linux/virtio_rpmsg.h> +#include <uapi/linux/rpmsg.h> + +#include <sound/sof/stream.h> +#include <sound/sof/rpmsg.h> + +#include "vhost.h" +#include "vhost_rpmsg.h" + +#define VHOST_DSP_FEATURES (VHOST_FEATURES | (1ULL << VIRTIO_RPMSG_F_NS)) + +struct snd_sof_dev; +struct sof_vhost_client; + +struct vhost_dsp { + struct vhost_rpmsg vrdev; + + struct sof_vhost_client *snd; + + bool active; + + /* RPMsg address of the position update endpoint */ + u32 posn_addr; + /* position...

...ult n > > not needed, default is always no. Ok, thanks, will remove. > > + ---help--- > > + SOF vhost VirtIO driver. It exports the same IPC interface, as the > > + one, used for Audio DSP communication, to Linux VirtIO guests. > > [...] > > > +struct vhost_dsp { > > + struct vhost_rpmsg vrdev; > > + > > + struct sof_vhost_client *snd; > > + > > + bool active; > > I am struggling with this definition, it seems to be a local flag but how is > it aligned to the actual DSP status? > In other words, can you have case...

This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be highly appreciated too! Thanks Guennadi [1]

This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be highly appreciated too! Thanks Guennadi [1]