search for: vhost_add_used_sign

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "vhost_add_used_sign".

Did you mean: vhost_add_used_signal
2013 Aug 23
1
[PATCH 2/6] vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used()
...terrupt, this can saves us some unnecessary signal to > guest. I will do some test. Have done some test. I can see 2% - 3% increasing in both aggregate transaction rate and per cpu transaction rate in TCP_RR and UDP_RR test. I'm using ixgbe. W/o this patch, I can see more than 100 calls of vhost_add_used_signal() in one vhost_zerocopy_signaled_used(). This is because ixgbe (and other modern ethernet driver) tends to free old tx skbs in a loop during tx interrupt, and vhost tend to batch the adding used and signal in vhost_zerocopy_callback(). Switching to use vhost_add_use_and_signal_n() means saving 10...
2013 Aug 23
1
[PATCH 2/6] vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used()
...terrupt, this can saves us some unnecessary signal to > guest. I will do some test. Have done some test. I can see 2% - 3% increasing in both aggregate transaction rate and per cpu transaction rate in TCP_RR and UDP_RR test. I'm using ixgbe. W/o this patch, I can see more than 100 calls of vhost_add_used_signal() in one vhost_zerocopy_signaled_used(). This is because ixgbe (and other modern ethernet driver) tends to free old tx skbs in a loop during tx interrupt, and vhost tend to batch the adding used and signal in vhost_zerocopy_callback(). Switching to use vhost_add_use_and_signal_n() means saving 10...
2013 Aug 16
2
[PATCH 2/6] vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used()
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:16:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Switch to use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() to avoid multiple calls to > vhost_add_used_and_signal(). With the patch we will call at most 2 times > (consider done_idx warp around) compared to N times w/o this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> So? Does this help performance then? >
2013 Aug 16
2
[PATCH 2/6] vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used()
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:16:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Switch to use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() to avoid multiple calls to > vhost_add_used_and_signal(). With the patch we will call at most 2 times > (consider done_idx warp around) compared to N times w/o this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> So? Does this help performance then? >