search for: vh3000

Got a community question at https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2466 with at least two users (and UPSes) in trouble. Curiously, they identify as 067b:2303 Prolific Technology like a common USB-Serial dongle brand. Experiments with blazer and nutdrv-qx got no reasonable response from the devices. Jim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Got a community question at https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2466 with at least two users (and UPSes) in trouble. Curiously, they identify as 067b:2303 Prolific Technology like a common USB-Serial dongle brand. Experiments with blazer and nutdrv-qx got no reasonable response from the devices. Jim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 6/24/24 11:30, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser wrote: > Got a community question at > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2466 > <https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2466> with at least two > users (and UPSes) in trouble. > > Curiously, they identify as |067b:2303 Prolific Technology| like a > common USB-Serial dongle brand. Experiments with blazer

On 6/24/24 12:50, gene heskett via Nut-upsuser wrote: > On 6/24/24 11:30, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser wrote: >> Curiously, they identify as |067b:2303 Prolific Technology| like a >> common USB-Serial dongle brand. Experiments with blazer and nutdrv-qx >> got no reasonable response from the devices. >> >> Jim >> > The cure Jim, is eliminate the prolific by