search for: vgpreload_memcheck

...valgrind process is running ==3135== --3135-- REDIR: 0x4018b90 (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2:strlen) redirected to 0x38075e81 (???) --3135-- Reading syms from /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_core-amd64-linux.so --3135-- object doesn't have a symbol table --3135-- Reading syms from /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so --3135-- object doesn't have a symbol table ==3135== WARNING: new redirection conflicts with existing -- ignoring it --3135-- old: 0x04018b90 (strlen ) R-> (0000.0) 0x38075e81 ??? --3135-- new: 0x04018b90 (strlen ) R-> (2007.0) 0x04c2cc6...

'virt-inspector --xpath' can segfault. When run under valgrind, it shows this error: ==2254== Invalid free() / delete / delete[] / realloc() ==2254== at 0x4C29D6A: free (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==2254== by 0x53BA198: xmlFreeNodeList (tree.c:3690) ==2254== by 0x53B9F65: xmlFreeDoc (tree.c:1247) ==2254== by 0x405BFA: do_xpath (inspector.c:808) ==2254== by 0x405BFA: main (inspector.c:250) ==2254== Address 0x1030a037 is 311 bytes inside a block of size 1,048 alloc...

WINS nsswitch module -------------------- The WINS nsswitch module has been rewritten to address memory issues and to simplify the code. The module now uses libwbclient to do WINS queries. This means that winbind needs to be running in order to resolve WINS names using the nss_wins module. This does not affect smbd. my problem: old versions >> ping google.com >> PING google.com

Hi, I used Samba 4.0.5 in Wheezy. Here is that I have done: --------------------------------------------------------------- samba-tool domain provision --realm=CHEZMOI.PRIV --domain=CHEZMOI \ --server-role=dc --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --adminpass='+toto123' echo "nameserver 192.168.0.21" > /etc/resolv.conf samba ln -s /usr/local/samba/lib/libnss_winbind.so

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.15.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.15.tar.gz.sig Some small fixes and changes to v2.2.14. This release is mainly in the hope that it could still make it into the next Debian stable instead of v2.2.14 - mainly because of a couple of new assert crashes that started happening in v2.2.14 and should be fixed now. * Plugins can now print

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.15.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.15.tar.gz.sig Some small fixes and changes to v2.2.14. This release is mainly in the hope that it could still make it into the next Debian stable instead of v2.2.14 - mainly because of a couple of new assert crashes that started happening in v2.2.14 and should be fixed now. * Plugins can now print

...a memory leak when this function is called: ---------------------------------------------------snip-------------------------------------------------------------- ==10304== 12,288 bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 74 of 76 ==10304== at 0x40222A4: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so) ==10304== by 0x416EE9F: block_alloc (mempool-alloconly.c:237) ==10304== by 0x416F16C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:140) ==10304== by 0x409C07D: mail_search_build_init (mail-search-build.c:187) ==10304== by 0x40C77F1: index_mailbox_get_metadata (index-status.c...

...ed a few memory leaks in LLVM. I've fixed 4 trivial ones, but there are a few more not-so-trivial remaining. Take a look at two common reports by valgrind: 240 (144 direct, 96 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 17 of 20 at 0x4023614: operator new(unsigned) (in vgpreload_memcheck.so) by 0x866B4B3: llvm::PointerType::get(llvm::Type const*, unsigned) (Type.cpp:1319) by 0x85E656E: llvm::BitcodeReader::ParseTypeTable() (BitcodeReader.cpp:498) by 0x85EDDB1: llvm::BitcodeReader::ParseModule(std::string const&) (BitcodeReader.cpp:1078) by 0x85EF35F: llvm::Bitcod...

...e at exit: 13,326 bytes in 56 blocks ==5926== total heap usage: 20,674 allocs, 20,618 frees, 29,235,096 bytes allocated ==5926== ==5926== Thread 1: ==5926== 47 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 17 of 31 ==5926== at 0x4C2B1C7: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==5926== by 0x5A71708: std::string::_Rep::_S_create(unsigned long, unsigned long, std::allocator<char> const&) (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.17) ==5926== by 0x5A730E4: char* std::string::_S_construct<char const*>(char const*, char const*, std::...

...llvm::PassManager::run(llvm::Module&) (in /home/alex/llvm/Release+Asserts/bin/opt) ==5134== by 0x41AE4D2: (below main) (libc-start.c:226) ==5134== Address 0x46cfa40 is 0 bytes after a block of size 200 alloc'd ==5134== at 0x402C454: operator new[](unsigned int) (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so) ==5134== by 0x4037AE0: (anonymous namespace)::Hello::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) (in /home/alex/llvm/Release+Asserts/lib/Hello.so)* and repeating. *==5230== HEAP SUMMARY: ==5230== in use at exit: 95,110 bytes in 317 blocks ==5230== total heap usage: 33,395 allocs, 33,078...

...pSids (ndr_lsa_c.c:3192) ==16475== by 0x152FD6: rpc_lookup_sids (winbindd_rpc.c:1145) ==16475== by 0x15D304: _wbint_LookupSids (winbindd_dual_srv.c:90) ==16475== Address 0x1bc3edde is 590 bytes inside a block of size 1,317 alloc'd ==16475== at 0x4C29BFD: malloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==16475== by 0xAAD6423: _talloc_pooled_object (in /usr/lib64/libtalloc.so.2.1.1) ==16475== by 0xB5E9E2D: _tevent_req_create (in /usr/lib64/libtevent.so.0.9.21) ==16475== by 0x95E07F0: smb1cli_req_create (smbXcli_base.c:1259) ==16475== by 0x95E2FD3: smb1cli_trans_send (sm...

...nd out why by running it through valgrind, which produced the output below. I am not sure how to proceed from here (other than binary search with print statements). Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Eric ==12589== Invalid read of size 1 ==12589== at 0x4C2F1B1: strcmp (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==12589== by 0x4F71AC1: Rf_inherits (in /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so) ==12589== by 0x11AFED3A: dplyr::subset_visitor_vector(SEXPREC*) (subset_visitor_impl.h:51) ==12589== by 0x11AFF58C: dplyr::subset_visitor(SEXPREC*, dplyr::SymbolString const&) (subset_visitor_impl.h:21) ==1...

...lvm::Module&) (in > /home/alex/llvm/Release+Asserts/bin/opt) > ==5134== by 0x41AE4D2: (below main) (libc-start.c:226) > ==5134== Address 0x46cfa40 is 0 bytes after a block of size 200 alloc'd > ==5134== at 0x402C454: operator new[](unsigned int) (in > /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so) > ==5134== by 0x4037AE0: (anonymous > namespace)::Hello::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) (in > /home/alex/llvm/Release+Asserts/lib/Hello.so)*/ > ==5134== Address 0x46cfa40 is 0 bytes after a block of size 200 alloc'd > ==5134== at 0x402C454: operator new[](uns...

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:19:02 +1100 (AEDT) Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > What version of OpenSSH is this? 6.8 portable on Linux. > Also, when reporting fuzzer-derived problems it really helps to > include the test-case. The "test case" is a one byte file containing a zero byte. But here it is :-) -- Hanno B?ck http://hboeck.de/ mail/jabber: hanno at

...t;(llvm::support::endianness)1, true> >(lld::elf::InputFile*) (SymbolTable.cpp:99) ==5467== Address 0xc6c7e80 is 53,568 bytes inside a block of size 98,304 free'd ==5467== at 0x4C2E26B: operator delete(void*) (in /nix/store/j7sf6f2i9gws7c5mn8jyi8wc08ab1zbp-valgrind-3.13.0/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==5467== by 0x4C714C: llvm::DenseMap<llvm::CachedHashStringRef, int, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::CachedHashStringRef>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::CachedHashStringRef, int> >::~DenseMap() (DenseMap.h:681) ==5467== by 0x4C9C7B: lld::elf::SymbolTable::~Symbol...

...== by 0x4EF959B: Rf_eval (eval.c:463) ==25398== by 0x4EF9F91: Rf_applyClosure (eval.c:666) ==25398== by 0x4EF988D: Rf_eval (eval.c:507) ==25398== Address 0x8F46010 is 72,976 bytes inside a block of size 182,760 free'd ==25398== at 0x4C226DB: free (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/amd64-linux/vgpreload_memcheck.so) ==25398== by 0x4F2D848: ReleaseLargeFreeVectors (memory.c:760) ==25398== by 0x4F359E9: RunGenCollect (memory.c:1378) ==25398== by 0x4F38938: R_gc_internal (memory.c:2171) ==25398== by 0x4F38046: Rf_allocVector (memory.c:1961) ==25398== by 0x4EDE779: duplicate1 (duplicate.c:221) =...

....c:258) ==15375==??? by 0x5073E7: R_ReplConsole (main.c:308) ==15375==??? by 0x507494: run_Rmainloop (main.c:1082) ==15375==??? by 0x41A8E6: main (Rmain.c:29) ==15375==? Address 0xb9e518d is 3,869 bytes inside a block of size 7,960 alloc'd ==15375==??? at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==15375==??? by 0x51033E: GetNewPage (memory.c:888) ==15375==??? by 0x511FC0: Rf_allocVector3 (memory.c:2691) ==15375==??? by 0x4657AC: Rf_allocVector (Rinlinedfuns.h:577) ==15375==??? by 0x4657AC: Rf_ScalarString (Rinlinedfuns.h:1007) ==15375==??? by 0x4657AC: coerceToVectorList (c...

...lld::elf::InputFile*) (SymbolTable.cpp:99) >> ==5467== Address 0xc6c7e80 is 53,568 bytes inside a block of size 98,304 >> free'd >> ==5467== at 0x4C2E26B: operator delete(void*) (in >> /nix/store/j7sf6f2i9gws7c5mn8jyi8wc08ab1zbp-valgrind-3.13.0/ >> lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) >> ==5467== by 0x4C714C: llvm::DenseMap<llvm::CachedHashStringRef, int, >> llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::CachedHashStringRef>, >> llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::CachedHashStringRef, int> >> >::~DenseMap() (DenseMap.h:681) >> ==5467==...

Hi all, I'm preparing a package which uses .Fortran to interface a Fortran 95 function. This F95 function simply receives the name of a file from R, opens this file and forwards its content to a F95 module, which, in turn, makes the real computation. The F95 module is a pre-existing one and I'm trying to use it in its actual state. Thus, data transfer between R and this F95 module is

...t exit: 3,604,364 bytes in 1,663 blocks ==25905== total heap usage: 83,930 allocs, 82,267 frees, 4,200,256,957 bytes allocated ==25905== ==25905== 41 (32 direct, 9 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 696 of 775 ==25905== at 0x4C2AB9D: realloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==25905== by 0x4ECF846: guestfs_int_safe_realloc (alloc.c:80) ==25905== by 0x4ED05FF: find_or_cache_feature (available.c:48) ==25905== by 0x4ED073C: guestfs_impl_feature_available (available.c:89) ==25905== by 0x4EA4B21: guestfs_feature_available (actions-5.c:1131) ==259...