Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "vfrcz".
Did you mean:
frc
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
2017 Sep 20
2
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...test cases for this
x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this
3.2 added upgrade for:
x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this
x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this
x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signature chagned and we upgrade from the old
signature. We don't have tests for the old signature.
x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't
have any tests for the old signature.
3.3 had no upgrades
3.4 removed:
x86.sse42.crc32.64.8 we do have tests that use it
For the complete list of intrinsic upgrade support, there's an annotated
list in ShouldUpgradeX86Intrinsic...
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
2017 Sep 20
0
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...il.* - we do test this
>
> 3.2 added upgrade for:
> x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this
> x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this
> x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signature chagned and we upgrade from the old
> signature. We don't have tests for the old signature.
> x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't
> have any tests for the old signature.
>
> 3.3 had no upgrades
>
> 3.4 removed:
> x86.sse42.crc32.64.8 we do have tests that use it
>
> For the complete list of intrinsic upgrade support, there's an annotat...
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
2017 Sep 20
2
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...gt;
>> 3.2 added upgrade for:
>> x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this
>> x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this
>> x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signature chagned and we upgrade from the old
>> signature. We don't have tests for the old signature.
>> x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't
>> have any tests for the old signature.
>>
>> 3.3 had no upgrades
>>
>> 3.4 removed:
>> x86.sse42.crc32.64.8 we do have tests that use it
>>
>> For the complete list of intrinsic upgrade...
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
2017 Sep 21
3
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...ermil.* - we do test this
>
> 3.2 added upgrade for:
> x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this
> x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this
> x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signature chagned and we upgrade from the old signature. We don't have tests for the old signature.
> x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't have any tests for the old signature.
>
> 3.3 had no upgrades
>
> 3.4 removed:
> x86.sse42.crc32.64.8 we do have tests that use it
>
> For the complete list of intrinsic upgrade support, there's an annota...
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
2017 Sep 20
0
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...test cases for this
x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this
3.2 added upgrade for:
x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this
x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this
x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signature chagned and we upgrade from the old signature. We don't have tests for the old signature.
x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't have any tests for the old signature.
3.3 had no upgrades
3.4 removed:
x86.sse42.crc32.64.8 we do have tests that use it
For the complete list of intrinsic upgrade support, there's an annotated list in ShouldUpgradeX86Intrinsic...
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
2017 Sep 22
0
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...il.* - we do test this
>
> 3.2 added upgrade for:
> x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this
> x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this
> x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signature chagned and we upgrade from the old
> signature. We don't have tests for the old signature.
> x86.xop.vfrcz.ss/sd had an argument dropped that we upgrade for. We don't
> have any tests for the old signature.
>
> 3.3 had no upgrades
>
> 3.4 removed:
> x86.sse42.crc32.64.8 we do have tests that use it
>
> For the complete list of intrinsic upgrade support, there's an annotat...