Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1676 matches for "vetoed".
2009 Jul 28
3
Reverse Veto Files - let's try again!
Since the list responsiveness seems to be at a high, le me
take the opportunity to repost a message that got no
answers in March:
I've searched the list, and I can't find reference to this being
implemented:
reverse veto files - a list of files *allowed* rather than
the current list of files *denied*. Possibly implemented by
just allowing a ! in the veto files directive.
eg:
veto
2006 Aug 04
1
reverse veto files?
Im currently having a very long list of veto files, just to be sure that
the people ONLY can write documents and styleshets. Is there any plan to
have a "reverse veto files" to ONLY allow this type of file? Because
when I have a lot of veto files the samba gets too slow, even if it
dosen't use regex, with regex i would be able to do the reverse veto.
But without regex and without
2018 Sep 17
3
Cannot access HOME folder after upgrading to 4.8 from 4.6
Hello-
I upgraded Samba from 4.6 to 4.8 on a FreeBSD 11.2 server. After the upgrade, users cannot access the HOME folder share but they can access other shares just fine.
I am using the RID backend on this member server that connects to Windows-based domain controllers. I apologize for the lengthy smb4.conf but here it is:
#======================= Global Settings
2005 Apr 18
1
how to "hide" the desktop.ini file on roaming profiles?
Hi people, im new on the list.
I have a samba 3.0.10 working as a PDC with roaming profiles for win2003
clients.
The problem is that the windows 2003 uses a lot of desktop.ini "hiden
files" that when i save this on my roaming profile and i log back in for
the second time i lost this "hiden bit" on the desktop.ini files and i
see them everywhere. Even on the
2005 Jan 31
3
Veto files applied per group
Hi guys,
I use "veto files = /.mp3/.mpg/" etc. on the [homes] share to prevent users from storing media files on a Samba server in the home directories.
My client now wishes to make this restriction apply to users who are members of only certain groups.
E.g. This restriction must apply to users who are members of the "Students" group and not apply to users in the
2010 Mar 29
2
Veto files with question mark
Hi !
I would like to remove from listing the "Icon?" files created by mac
user when they customize their folder icon.
So I did in my smb.conf :
veto files = /Icon?/
ok it's working, but "Icone" "Iconx" "Icons" will be removed too. I
tried veto files = /Icon\?/ but it's not working,
Is there a way to use question mark (?) but not as a wild-card ?
2013 Dec 18
1
Troubles getting samba4 working (from samba 3)
Our current environment is Samba 3 with an LDAP backend. I want to move to
Samba 4 with an AD backend. We already have the AD servers in place and
Samba 3 servers are using AD absolutely perfectly. The last remaining piece
is to move Samba 3->4.
My existing Samba 3 configuration looks like this:
[global]
server string = 1220 Boothost Server
netbios name = BOOTHOST-1220
2016 Oct 27
1
smb.conf veto files entry question
While working on my existing member file server smb.conf config file I
found an entry for "veto files" like the following:
veto files = /.bash_logout/.bash_profile/.bash_history/.bashrc/
The "man smb.conf" entry says:
veto files (S)
This is a list of files and directories that are neither
visible
nor accessible. Each entry in the list must be
2000 Jul 04
2
veto dot files?
How can I *veto* dot files?
The naive approach of using
/.*/
fails in so far as no file at all appears on the NT side :-) Hiding isn't
enough for me, as I do want to see all hidden files on the NT side of
things - I just don't want to see the Linux dot files on the NT side.
This is Samba 2.0.6 (RH6.2) with the below configuration.
TIA,
Stefan
************
# Samba config file
2002 May 16
2
2.2.4 and "veto files" -> cpu maxed out
linux 2.2.19/rh6x
I use in a share
veto files = /.*/
whenever you connect to it the client process hangs, the smbd starts
consuming cpu time and cannot be killed but with "kill -9".
This is the last part of the smbd log
[2002/05/16 05:49:51, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(319)
3 user groups:
100 6 19
[2002/05/16 05:49:51, 3] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2findfirst(863)
2010 May 17
1
Veto files: adding exceptions per user and/or extension
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I'm using Samba 3 on a Debian 5.0 (Lenny), the
package is version 3.4.7 (from Debian backports, the
full version 2:3.4.7~dfsg-2~bpo50+2).
We use some 'veto files' on our shares to avoid
users to have multimedia files (movies, mp3 and so on).
Now we have a true demand to allow certain users to
store corporate videos (about our
2018 Nov 22
1
Index Corruption xBase database
...files you would use the line (either in the [global] section or in
> the section for the particular NetBench share.
>
> An example of use is:
>
> veto oplock files = /.*SEM/
>
> Default: veto oplock files = # No files are vetoed for oplock
> grants
On 2018-11-22 10:49 a.m., Jose Concha via samba wrote:
> Thanks for the tip. Is veto oplocks different to oplocks = no?
>
> Just now I run into an error, but this time I have this log:
>
> ../lib/util/util.c:401(fcntl_lock)
> fcntl_lock: fcntl...
2004 Sep 09
1
"username map" parameter not working after upgrade to SAMBA 3
I have been using the "username map" parameter for some time on various
versions of Samba 2, and it has worked nicely. Last week I upgraded to
Samba 3 and integrated with Active Directory. Since I am using Solaris
8, and "nsswitch.conf" doesn't support winbindd, I am using the "add
user script" parameter to add users. What is happening is that users in
2006 Apr 23
1
User Manger for Domains can not reset user password.
I am running RHES 3.0 with Samba 3.0.22 and Open Ldap 2.1.22 ldapsam and
when I use User Manager for Domains and try to change a user password as
root or any other Domain Admin account I get the following error: "The
following error occurred changing the properties of the user jcampbell.
The group name could not be found." When you look at groups under user
manager Domain Users is set
2002 Feb 28
0
veto dotfiles but not directory?
I've been playing around a little bit with the "veto files" option for
the [homes] shares we have on our Samba servers (2.2.1a & 2.2.3a).
I've discovered that:
veto files = /.*/
works marvelously for not letting the users muck with their .dotfiles,
which is exactly what we want, however, I've also discovered that it
also clobbers the special directory entries
2009 Aug 20
2
Veto files question
Hi, there
I have a question about Veto files in smb.conf:
Can we use this option to hidden files not belonging to myself in a
shared folder?
If not, how do we implement this functionality in Samba?
Thanks,
Allen
2002 Nov 06
4
"hiding" and "vetoing" files (for Samba 2.2.2 & Windows Explorer)
We're running Samba 2.2.2 on an RS/6000 (AIX 4.3.3) using Windows 95
clients. We've tried the "hide files" and "veto files" option in smb.conf,
but when the shares are mapped, we can still see the contents in Windows
Explorer. We used the wildcard for all the contents of the shares (ex.
hide files = /*.*/). The Samba manual only makes reference to Windows 98,
so
2017 Mar 16
2
Veto files used to allow only one extension to be written to the share
Good night.
I am behind a way so that in my backup share it is possible to only write
files in the format of the application that I use to execute the backup
routines, for this I searched the internet for a solution that works like
Allow Files, however it is Complicated to find.
Talking on forums a user informed me that he could use the parameter to
follow in smb.conf, however in my tests it did
1998 Jul 08
0
folders with veto files not being deleted
Hi,
I am running the latest Samba (p8) on Solaris 2.6. The PC clients are
running win95 OSR2. I am using encrypted passwords.
I have some files vetoed:
veto files = /.rssrc/.desktop/
I'm not using 'hide dot files'.
If I have a folder with one file in, and that file is a vetoed file, I
cannot delete the folder. I have unix permissions to delete both. The
windows error message is:
Cannot remove folder Akzidenz: The file exists.
This...
2004 May 19
1
'veto oplock files' option in 3.0.2a broken ???
Hi all..
I'm update my samba, from 2.2.8a to 3.0.2a, and now my 'veto oplock files' do no work...
I set my option like this: veto oplock files = /*.mdb/*.MDB/
but after the first user open our software (that opens a file .mdb in a samba share) the second user can't open... he gets the error message: 'Couln't lock the file'
Even setting all locking options = no, the