search for: versiosn

>Although there are some "isohybrid.exe" around, there is no official support for them and they are also outdated. >The Syslinux mailing list already includes several emails about issues in the included isohybrid variants. I think that deleting either of them would be a mistake. At least users such as Ian might benefit from both being included. >Ideally, the Perl variant

...nux.bin boot images from other versions. This applies to the executable from isohybrid.c and to isohybrid.pl. So my proposal would be to fix isohybrid.c and to declare isohybrid.pl frozen and deprecated. (As long as isohybrid.in exists it will be able to adapt to the MBR templates of new SYSLINUX versiosn.) Ian Bannerman: > While I did know the .exe variant was not official / untrusted, Is there a special reason for this ? (Except the known bugs which affect Linux binaries, too.) Have a nice day :) Thomas

...versions. > This applies to the executable from isohybrid.c and to isohybrid.pl. > > So my proposal would be to fix isohybrid.c and to declare > isohybrid.pl frozen and deprecated. > (As long as isohybrid.in exists it will be able to adapt to > the MBR templates of new SYSLINUX versiosn.) Although I hope someone can still update the Perl variant, at least it should not be deleted and the differences / limitations should be documented. FWIW, I would not want to "declare" it frozen, as it would stop any potential contributions attempting to improve the Perl variant....