search for: version1

...o me what is happening here? Honestly? I don't understand where the difference but it's critical! Because obviuosly when I have a set of numeric values (ALL have three digits) and to boundry values lb/up, a lower and an upper boundry, I could (from what I thought until now) chosse between: Version1: > small.set <- set[set %in% seq(lb,up,by=0.001)] Version2: > small.set <- set[set >= lb & set <= up] Unfortunately with my data I used I got around 8000 values from my set with version1 but about 24000 with version2. IS there some main diffrence I didn't take into accou...

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ $ cd objdir $ ../llvm-2.1/configure --help [...] --enable-shared[=PKGS] build shared libraries [default=enable_shared_default] --enable-static[=PKGS] build static libraries [default=enable_static_default] --enable-fast-install[=PKGS]...

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be > stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got: Can you try it again without bison with these files: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20070917/053582.html If they work, we...

Hi. What''s beautiful about Rails is that it provides the incredibly easy system for API building. At the same time once you grow and production test the application you start finding that you can make the API interface even better. But you have to break backward compatibility. How do you handle this situation? I was initially planning something like DNS versioning and multiple rails

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got: gmake[2]: Entering directory `/home/emil/ll/objdir-llvm/utils/TableGen' llvm[2]: Compiling AsmWriterEmitter.cpp for Release build llvm[2]: Compiling CallingConvE...

On Sep 17, 2007, at 6:59 PM, Emil Mikulic wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:25:40PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: >>>> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: >>>> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ >>> >>> I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be >>> stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got: >> >> Can you try it again without bison with these files: >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/...

Tanya Lattner wrote: > LLVMers, > > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ A couple months ago, I had a problem packaging llvm-gcc for macports because one of the binaries from llvm-gcc was somehow getting used by Apple's gcc driver instead of the native one. This was causing some subtle bugs for people. Anyway, someone, I don't remember who, helped me out w...

...I read through the pdf docs and looked around but in this situation I assume all traffic and etc will go through *? Or will it just talk to * in the loop and use the Skinny/SCCP to talk to the router. Now I have come across http://www.loligo.com/asterisk/cisco/827-4v/cisco-827-4v-with-asterisk-version1 Which seems to use SIP between the router and *. Not sure if they were using SIP to communicate to the phones or not. Please excuse my ignorance in this matter I am a newbie to PBX, VOIP, and *. There is allot to take in at once and I am doing what I can. -- Sincerely, William L. Thomson Jr. Su...

Hello, Two lapply questions (system info and sample data below): 1) Why does the first form of command1 add the name of y _after_ the str() output rather than before as does the second (preferred) form? # command1 version1 invisible(lapply(ls(pattern='bn'), function(y) cat(y, "\n", str(get(y)), "\n") )) # command1 version2 (preferred output) invisible(lapply(ls(pattern='bn'), function(y) { cat(y, "\n") ; str(get(y)) ; cat("\n") } )) 2) Why does the sa...

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:25:40PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote: > >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > > > I suspect the utils/TableGen/FileParser.h.cvs in the tarball may be > > stale. I tried building LLVM without bison installed and got: > > Can you try it again without bison with these files: > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20070917...

...'BOR - Donegall Road Timetable.xls' being presented with the 'cancel/retry' message & selecting retry a number of times. The second (level 6) is here <http://www.upsilon.org.uk/temp/log.smbd.gz> and shows a user attempting to open excel file 'ITT Financial Statement (version1)(version 1).xls' being presented with the same 'cancel/retry' message and selecting retry one time. It was suggested that this may be being caused by DNS issues - initially I had no DNS server running on the LAN. In an attempt to remedy the problem (unsuccessful), I set up a DNS server...

Hey all, I have moved 10_Linux to 50_Linux and ran update-grub which is fine. The problem I have is that there is xen-syms in /boot And that is being put first in the boot list which is incorrect. How do you make /xen.gz at the top so it is booted first? Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

...ploading file by using attachment_fu and acts_as_versioned so the problem is i can''t delete only selected version for example ; i have file a.txt and this file have 5 version each version is viewable ( that mean you can view version 1 , version 2 , version 3 .............. ) a.txt ( version1 ) a.txt ( version2) a.txt ( version3 ) a.txt ( version 4) a.txt (version 5 ) <<<<< latest version and i would like to delete ONLY version 3 so the result after delete should be like this a.txt ( version 1) a.txt ( version 2 ) a.txt ( version 4) a.txt (version 5 ) <<<&lt...

...m {:controller=>"images", :action=>"show", :category_id=>"rails"} It appears that the image_tag is being confused for an image_url ??? Has anyone come across this or have the acts_as_attachment plugin working in their application. 1. routes.rb (working version1) ========================= #eg categories/1/products map.resources :categories do |categories| categories.resources :products end map.connect '':controller/service.wsdl'', :action => ''wsdl'' map.connect '':controller/:action/:id''...

...which case don't test them. You'd then need to determine a threshold for accepting that the test is valid (say p < 0.05). I'#d contest that the test should be two tailed - results could be better or worse? You should also develop a hypothesis. Let me create one for you: A. H1: version1 of the software is better than baseline (H0: version 1 is no better than baseline) B. H1: version2 of the software is better than version 1 (H0: version 2 is no better than version 1) C. H1: version3 of the software is better than version 2 (H0: version 3 is no better than version 2) Now look at...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download llvm-2.1, l...

Hey all, I want to scrap some content from a website to rails application and wants to authenticate the url of the website which I want to scarp so please help me out.... Thank You!!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Hi! >Message: 5 >Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:00:21 +0530 >From: Sudheer Divakaran <sudheer@svw.com> >To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl >Subject: [LARTC] Is Linux based Router feasible > >Hi, > >I''ve a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I''m using a Linux >machine as the gateway machine which inturn connects to two different >ISPs. My

it seems that puppet refuse to run in the new version. It fails on the line: err: Could not apply complete configuration: Unknown configuration parameter :lockdir the client is .22.1 and server still .22.0 -- Cordialement, Ghislain _______________________________________________ Puppet-users mailing list Puppet-users@madstop.com https://mail.madstop.com/mailman/listinfo/puppet-users

On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:28 PM, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > Tanya Lattner wrote: >> LLVMers, >> >> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: >> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > A couple months ago, I had a problem packaging llvm-gcc for macports > because one of the binaries from llvm-gcc was somehow getting used by > Apple's gcc driver instead of the native one. This was causing some > subtle bugs for people. Anyway, someone, I don't remember...