search for: verita

Hi all, How to dtrace a who is writing a veritas volume? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20070412/dfd8c254/attachment.html>

We have some HDS storage that isn''t supported by mpxio, so we have to use veritas dmp to get multipathing. Whats the recommended way to use DMP storage with ZFS. I want to use DMP but get at the multipathed virtual luns at as low a level as possible to avoid using vxvm as much as possible. I figure theres no point in having overhead from 2 volume manages if we can avoid it....

I'm having particular issues running Veritas in my Windows environment. The agent just seems to baulk on some servers. I've looked into backup solutions running on Linux before but there doesn't seem to be much. Is anyone familiar with something that has Windows agents and yet managed by Linux? <<JAV>> -------------- nex...

Hi, I''m aware that if we talking about DMP on Solaris the preferred way is to use MPxIO, still I have a question if any of you got any experience with ZFS on top of Veritas DMP? Does it work? Is it supported? Any real life experience/tests in this subject? Regards, sendai -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

I figured out a previous issue to allow you to connect veritas BE to a samba system. You basically just defind a c$ share, and it was happy (Veritas BE version 8.5 Rev 3572) Now, I cannot get the user defined share to connect for the life of me anymore. The backup user can connect using windows shares, but within the application, I'm out of luck. It...

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > > There was no court case, but VERITAS published a modifed version of gtar where > additional code was added by binary only libraries from VERITAS. The FSF did > never try to discuss this is public even though everybody did know about the > existence. As long as the FSF does not try to sue VERITAS, we are safe - > regardles...

...ered that CA's ARCServe package (formerly made by Cheyenne Software) couldn't care less if a network share is sourced by a Windows or *nix type system running Samba. It browses and backs up either one with ease. Chris already posted the same thing he mailed to me to the list. Essentially, Veritas won't do a thing about it, and it does appear to be a design flaw in their software (considering that ARCserve doesn't have a problem with it). Sad, really. Backup Exec used to be a pretty good product. Sounds like Veritas has turned into the Microsoft of the backup software world, just...

...his error has some link to my problem. Should I upgrade to the latest stable and does it address this error? I will say that ./samba/private is shared between two identical samba servers running smbd simultaneously. By shared, I mean that the ./private directory is on a shared filesystem (via Veritas clustered filesystem). Each server is running its own independent binaries and ./var/locks. But only one server is running nmbd at time. The other one is always ready to start nmbd upon nmbd failure. If secrets.tdb is shared, would this really only be involved with nmbd/smbd during domain me...

Hello. Has this been tried by anybody? I would appreciate any practical feedback on a setup where Dovecot was clustered with Veritas software. Best regards, Dmitrij Malakhov

On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 02:48:59PM -0700, Richard Fox wrote: > > Running the SAMBA that is released with RedHat 6.2, Veritas Backup Exec > 8.0 does not work. However, when running the latest dev version of SAMBA > Backup Exec does work. What files were changed to fix this bug? I would > like to update what I am running without having to go to the dev version. > > I have searched the website and can not f...

Hi, gang, There have been numerous postings, scattered across various Internet forums (including this one), about problems encountered using Veritas Backup Exec 8.6 and higher with Samba-sourced shares from *nix servers. In my particular case, I have a Windows NT Server 4.0-based backup system, which is supposed to be able to back up the other Windows systems on the LAN, plus several SPARC boxes running NetBSD 1.6.1 and Samba. I started runn...

Hi all, Wondering if anyone can help me here? Having just upgraded from Samba 3.0.2a to Samba 3.0.4, I've found that Veritas Backup Exec 8.6 is no longer able to browse my shares. A quick "make revert" and everything is back as it should be. The things I see in the samba log are like this: [2004/05/19 12:46:40, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619) titanium (192.168.1.39) connect to service Archiv...

Hi Everyone ; I will soon be making a presentation comparing ZFS against Veritas Storage Foundation , do we have any document comparing features ? regards <http://www.sun.com/> http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif Mertol Ozyoney Storage Practice - Sales Manager Sun Microsystems, TR Istanbul TR Phone +902123352200 Mobile +905339310752 Fax +902123352222...

I'm just wondering if anyone else here is using this? The majority of jobs on our CentOS5 server "fail" by "Communications failure" right at the end, apparently on the very last file which, however, is recoverable, as is the whole archive. In more than half these failures, the Linux agent has stopped and, in about half of those, crashes leaving a backtrace. I had similar

We installed BMR boot server version 6.0 on DELL server. This DELL server have CENTOS 3.7 in it. We got error message when we tried to use "bmrsrtadm". Anyone know how to fix it or work around? ./bmrsrtadm Select one of the following options: 1. Create a new Shared Resource Tree. 2. Create a new CD image based Shared Resource Tree. 3. Copy an existing

Hi, I've got Samba 2.0.2 and a server NT4 SP3 with Seagate BackupExec 7.0. When I want to backup Samba with Seagate BackupExec, I get a message saying "Unable to connect to server, <F5> to retry", and then another one saying "A device specific error occured". I've read all the Samba archive about that subject, but I do not find any solution. I don't

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > The GPL makes claims that are in conflict with the law because these claims are > not amongst what the list in the law permits and that are thus void. The GPL is all that gives you permission to distribute. If it is void then you have no permission at all to distribute any

What are the users here opinions on enteriprise grade opensource software for doing backups, as an alternative to bakbone or veritas. We just have basic requirements, i.e backing up nfs servers. --

During the last two years our fileserver was a VERITAS Samba-2.0.10-VRTS server. This Veritas version of samba contains a special ACL component for the uid <-> sid and gid <-> sid mapping. It also transparently converts Windows access rights to Unix access rights and vice versa. The recent changes in the Windows mbx driver forced us to mov...

I am using samba to pull a backup of my linux host over the network so I made the following share: [backup] comment = share for veritas path = / valid users = root read only = yes dont descend = proc dev mnt lost+found sys follow symlinks = no hide unreadable = yes The root user is mapped to administrator and the samba host is on the domain, so the windows box logs on and pulls it's backup just fine except for whe...