search for: verified_package_depend

On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 20:29 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 21/05/2019 20:15, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 17:44 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > > There was some talk of this happening automatically, but this > > > seems > > > to > > > have not come to fruition yet. > > > > It has. See the

...emove and 21 not upgraded. Remv krb5-kdc [1.16-2ubuntu0.1] I checked in apt history log and the package was installed manually, it's in the "Verified package dependencies" script for Ubuntu 18.04 [1] [1] https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba#Verified_Package_Dependencies -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.it YetOpen S.r.l. - https://www.yetopen.it/ Via Salerno 18 - 23900 Lecco - ITALY - Tel +39 0341 220 205 - Fax +39 178 6070 222 Think green - Non stampare questa e-mail se non necessario / Don't print this email unless necessary -------- D....

...; > Between you and me I'm sure we can come up with a clear structure. > > Most likely a table of versions vs distributions with a > link to each. > > I made a start on this here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required > _to_Build_Samba#Verified_Package_Dependencies > > It includes a protected page (given the links) here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verified_Package_Dependencies > > I hope we will see bootstrap backported so we can fill out 4.10 in > there, as that is causing most of the confusion, otherwise at least we &...

...packages here: http://apt.van-belle.nl/ > I checked in apt history log and the package was installed manually, it's in the "Verified package dependencies" script for Ubuntu 18.04 [1] > > > [1] https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba#Verified_Package_Dependencies Yes, you are correct it is there. Hi Andrew, why is this ? what with MIT being 'experimental'. I can understand Samba testing requiring it, but we shouldn't be pointing our users at something that contains things they definitely do not need. Rowland

> Not sure, but that is the way it looks, just a thought, are you using > sssd ? no, not even installed > Just like a normal share, '[homes]' is a special share that doesn't use > 'path. There used to be something on the wiki about using '[home]' on a > DC, I didn't know it had gone until you mentioned it ;-) So if I use [home] it would be a normal