search for: verfications

The verification package has recently been posted to CRAN. This package was initially developed by people in the Verification Group at the National Center for Atmospheric Research to verfiy and study weather models and forecasts. It has been written in general terms to be applicable to other fields of study. Functions include receiver operating characteristic curves attribute diagrams

The verification package has recently been posted to CRAN. This package was initially developed by people in the Verification Group at the National Center for Atmospheric Research to verfiy and study weather models and forecasts. It has been written in general terms to be applicable to other fields of study. Functions include receiver operating characteristic curves attribute diagrams

Hi all! I'm configuring Samba 3.0.1 on Solaris 9 (rel s9_58shwpl3) Sparc. Have successfully installed Ldap libs, Krb5 libs, and, finally - Samba. Trying to join W2KSP4 domain. net rpc join -S dc01 -U Administrator Gives bash-2.05# /usr/local/samba/bin/net rpc join -S dc01-tmn -U Administrator Password: Joined domain MYDOMAIN. Now i start winbindd. The smb.conf file is:

On Sunday, January 26, 2020 3:58:31 PM CET Pete Biggs wrote: > > what does Centos 7 do with UPD packets having invalid checksums? > > By default I assume they are just dropped - that's what should happen. Hm that's what thought. > > Are such packets inevitably dropped? > > Applications can specifically disable checksum checking for the kernel > network stack

Hi all, I am trying to set up a samba server with samba3-final (I've got a PDC with samba-2.2.8 + ldap and it works great, now I would like to migrate). I can't join machines to the domain: # net rpc testjoin [2003/09/29 02:46:45, 0] utils/net_rpc_join.c:net_rpc_join_ok(73) Error in domain join verfication Join to domain 'HOME' is not valid My global section in smb.conf file

I''ve got a block of code that''s turning out.. well - just plain ugly. So i know I must not be doing it the Ruby way. The main problem I''m having is in dealing with handling errors - and just not finding much Rails documentation that gives a deeper understanding of how to handle errors in Rails (outside of several docs on the catch-all''s) the main method

First of all - disclaimer - I'm no network specialist, I just read and am interested in it. I may get things wrong!! > > > Both physical interfaces show the same. But does this mean it's on as in "rx- > checksumming: on" or off as in "tx-checksum-ipv4: off [fixed]"? As far as I understand it rx-checksum is the underlying wire checksumming - and from

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, Dan Grostick wrote: > [heartbeat] > driver=dummy-ups > port=heartbeat.conf > mode=dummy-once > desc= "Heart beat verfication of NUT" I would be interesting to see the file heartbeat.conf and the NOTIFYFLAG declarations in upsmon.conf . See also chapter 6.3 "Configuration file upsmon.conf for workstation with heartbeat" in

Dear all, This is now for weeks that I try to get samba working again. This is urgent as all users profiles are on this server. Everything was working well, until we got Welchia Virus. We removed the virus, and updated our servers to SP3 + Windows2000-KB823980-x86-ENU.exe patch. I removed the SP and the Patch, but I'm still unable to correctly join the domain. I upgraded to Samba 3.0.1

Hi, what does Centos 7 do with UPD packets having invalid checksums? Are such packets inevitably dropped? Does a network card drop them when it does checksum verification in hardware even before the packets go anywhere? In general, if someone were to send me UPD packets with invalid checksums over the internet, how far would such packets get? In particular, how likely it is that SRTP

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024, Dan Grostick wrote: > It is consistently happening 14-15 minutes after starting. Please see attached > upssched-cmd and upssched.conf. I don't have a upssched.cmd. The binary > upssched is used. After the heartbeat failure, is upsd still running? Does the command "upsc -L" report the UPS's? If you use systemd, what does the command

L.P.H. van Belle via samba ha scritto il 26/08/20 alle 15:41: > [...] > Thats exacly what i see. > This: net use g: \\IP\share /persistent:yes > > Used COMPUTERNAME\username at REALM Or DOM\USER at COMPUTERNAME > And not not DOM\user at REALM > Thats what i mean, and if you look good in your logs you see this also. yes I've seen it but if you say "Your not sending

No, the point is.. User verfications Computer verification And Authentication. These are 3 different things. The differences, in terms. NTLM KERBEROS DNS-lookups and how this all works together. But i only type with lots of errors, this is better to read ;-) https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/security/windows-auth...

how would you check for a range using rspec? person.password.range.should == Range.new(5..40) <- this doesn''t work -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070527/4d8cb007/attachment-0001.html

On Sunday, January 26, 2020 11:18:36 PM CET Pete Biggs wrote: > First of all - disclaimer - I'm no network specialist, I just read and > am interested in it. I may get things wrong!! > > > Both physical interfaces show the same. But does this mean it's on as in > > "rx- checksumming: on" or off as in "tx-checksum-ipv4: off [fixed]"? > > As

This patch against OpenBSD -current adds a simple form of PKI to OpenSSH. We'll be using it at work. See README.certkey (the first chunk of the patch) for details. Everything below is BSD licensed, sponsored by Allamanda Networks AG. Daniel --- /dev/null Wed Nov 15 15:14:20 2006 +++ README.certkey Wed Nov 15 15:13:45 2006 @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ +OpenSSH Certkey + +INTRODUCTION + +Certkey allows