search for: verfic

The verification package has recently been posted to CRAN. This package was initially developed by people in the Verification Group at the National Center for Atmospheric Research to verfiy and study weather models and forecasts. It has been written in general terms to be applicable to other fields of study. Functions include receiver operating characteristic curves attribute diagrams

The verification package has recently been posted to CRAN. This package was initially developed by people in the Verification Group at the National Center for Atmospheric Research to verfiy and study weather models and forecasts. It has been written in general terms to be applicable to other fields of study. Functions include receiver operating characteristic curves attribute diagrams

.../wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT (0xc000018b) Could not check secret bash-2.05# And net rpc testjoin sais: bash-2.05# ./net rpc testjoin [2004/01/19 08:43:40, 0] utils/net_rpc_join.c:net_rpc_join_ok(73) Error in domain join verfication (fresh connection) Join to domain 'TMN' is not valid The log is: Jan 16 18:47:39 SAMBA_SERVER pam_winbind[9808]: [ID 467601 auth.error] request failed: No trusted SAM account, PAM error was 4, NT error was NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT Jan 16 18:47:39 SAMBA_SERVER pam_winbind[9808]:...

...to get recalculated correctly but like randomly without intent? Only when asterisk (i. e. libsrtp) finally verifies the authentication tag of an SRTP package against the authenticated part of the package --- which, according to RFC 3711, seems to be the entire payload of the UPD package --- the verfication fails. How is that possible?

...I am trying to set up a samba server with samba3-final (I've got a PDC with samba-2.2.8 + ldap and it works great, now I would like to migrate). I can't join machines to the domain: # net rpc testjoin [2003/09/29 02:46:45, 0] utils/net_rpc_join.c:net_rpc_join_ok(73) Error in domain join verfication Join to domain 'HOME' is not valid My global section in smb.conf file is: # smb.conf [global] ldap server = laptop.home ldap suffix = ou=Users,dc=laptop,dc=home ldap admin dn = cn=manager,dc=laptop,dc=home ldap ssl = off ldap delete dn = yes ldap group suffix...

...request can send back an error code. In all three cases I want to send the user back to the form they came from and display either the active record errors or the XML error messages. You can see my two "hackish" approaches to catching the errors with the XML errors with an if else in the verfication and a rescue at the bottom to catch times when the success values i expect are not present. But trying to add in the ActiveRecord validation at the top (go.save) causes the error to fall straight down to the rescue clause even when i try to intercept it with if else clauses, etc. Using redire...

...ted as part of the switching process. > > Only when asterisk (i. e. libsrtp) finally verifies the authentication tag of > an SRTP package against the authenticated part of the package --- which, > according to RFC 3711, seems to be the entire payload of the UPD package --- > the verfication fails. > > How is that possible? > If it's SRTP checksum error, then that checksum is part of the packet payload at the application level - the UDP checksum is for the whole packet. Presumably the contents of the application payload were altered after the SRTP checksum was calc...

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, Dan Grostick wrote: > [heartbeat] > driver=dummy-ups > port=heartbeat.conf > mode=dummy-once > desc= "Heart beat verfication of NUT" I would be interesting to see the file heartbeat.conf and the NOTIFYFLAG declarations in upsmon.conf . See also chapter 6.3 "Configuration file upsmon.conf for workstation with heartbeat" in https://rogerprice.org/NUT/ConfigExamples.A5.pdf Roger

...assword: Joined domain DOMAIN. LinuxServer samba # net rpc testjoin [2003/12/26 18:17:03, 0, pid=5079] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(249) cli_nt_setup_creds: request challenge failed [2003/12/26 18:17:03, 0, pid=5079] utils/net_rpc_join.c:net_rpc_join_ok(73) Error in domain join verfication (fresh connection) Join to domain 'DOMAIN' is not valid LinuxServer samba # wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was NT_STATUS_NOLOGON_WORKSTATION_TRUST_ACCOUNT (0xc0000199) Could not check secret LinuxServer samba #

Hi, what does Centos 7 do with UPD packets having invalid checksums? Are such packets inevitably dropped? Does a network card drop them when it does checksum verification in hardware even before the packets go anywhere? In general, if someone were to send me UPD packets with invalid checksums over the internet, how far would such packets get? In particular, how likely it is that SRTP

L.P.H. van Belle via samba ha scritto il 26/08/20 alle 15:41: > [...] > Thats exacly what i see. > This: net use g: \\IP\share /persistent:yes > > Used COMPUTERNAME\username at REALM Or DOM\USER at COMPUTERNAME > And not not DOM\user at REALM > Thats what i mean, and if you look good in your logs you see this also. yes I've seen it but if you say "Your not sending

No, the point is.. User verfications Computer verification And Authentication. These are 3 different things. The differences, in terms. NTLM KERBEROS DNS-lookups and how this all works together. But i only type with lots of errors, this is better to read ;-) https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/security/window...

how would you check for a range using rspec? person.password.range.should == Range.new(5..40) <- this doesn''t work -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070527/4d8cb007/attachment-0001.html

...t at two different places. > > Only when asterisk (i. e. libsrtp) finally verifies the authentication tag > > of an SRTP package against the authenticated part of the package --- > > which, according to RFC 3711, seems to be the entire payload of the UPD > > package --- the verfication fails. > > > > How is that possible? > > If it's SRTP checksum error, then that checksum is part of the packet > payload at the application level - the UDP checksum is for the whole > packet. Presumably the contents of the application payload were > altered af...

...The CA gains the power to grant +individual users access to the server, and users do no longer need to maintain +authorized_keys files of their own. + +Functionally, the CA assumes responsibility and control over users' known_hosts +and authorized_keys files. + +Certkey does not involve online verfication, the CA is not contacted by either +client or server. Instead, the CA generates certificates which are (once) +distributed to hosts and users. Any subsequent logins take place without the +involvment of the CA, based solely on the certificates provided between client +and server. + +For exampl...