search for: verelox

Interesting problem... Did you considered an insider job?( comes to mind http://verelox.com <https://t.co/dt1c78VRxA> recent troubles) On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 3:30 AM, W Kern <wkmail at bneit.com> wrote: > > > On 8/6/2017 4:57 PM, lemonnierk at ulrar.net wrote: > > > Gluster already uses a vlan, the problem is that there is no easy way > that I know o...

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 10:40:08AM +0200, Arman Khalatyan wrote: > Interesting problem... > Did you considered an insider job?( comes to mind http://verelox.com > <https://t.co/dt1c78VRxA> recent troubles) I would be really really surprised, we are only 5 / 6 with access and as far as I know no one has a problem with the company. The last person to leave did so last year, and we revoked everything (I hope). And I can't think of a reason t...

On 8/6/2017 4:57 PM, lemonnierk at ulrar.net wrote: > > Gluster already uses a vlan, the problem is that there is no easy way > that I know of to tell gluster not to listen on an interface, and I > can't not have a public IP on the server. I really wish ther was a > simple "listen only on this IP/interface" option for this What about this?

> You should add VLANS, and/or overlay networks and/or Mac Address > filtering/locking/security which raises the bar quite a bit for hackers. > Perhaps your provider can help you with that. > Gluster already uses a vlan, the problem is that there is no easy way that I know of to tell gluster not to listen on an interface, and I can't not have a public IP on the server. I really