Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "verbosily".
Did you mean:
verbosely
2018 Apr 30
0
RFC: LLVM Assembly format for ThinLTO Summary
...ode case" -
with the option to not support old/difficult textual IR. If there are
easy/obvious defaults, I'd say it's probably worth baking those in (&
baking them in even for the existing fields we know about, to make it
easier to write more terse test cases that don't have to
verbosily/redundantly specify lots of default values?) to the
parsing/loading logic?
>
>
>
>
>
> * 1. Force the LLVM assembly file to be recreated with a new summary. I.e.
> “opt -module-summary -o - | llvm-dis”.2. Auto-upgrade, by silently creating
> conservative values for the new...
2018 May 01
0
llvm-dev Digest, Vol 167, Issue 3
...support old/difficult textual IR. If there are
> > easy/obvious defaults, I'd say it's probably worth baking those in (&
> > baking them in even for the existing fields we know about, to make it
> > easier to write more terse test cases that don't have to
> > verbosily/redundantly specify lots of default values?) to the
> > parsing/loading logic?
> >
>
> So we do emit an index version in the bitcode, and auto-upgrade in a
> conservative manner anything that wasn't emitted prior. We could presumably
> serialize out the version number an...
2018 Apr 24
8
RFC: LLVM Assembly format for ThinLTO Summary
Hi everyone,
I started working on a long-standing request to have the summary dumped in
a readable format to text, and specifically to emit to LLVM assembly.
Proposal below, please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks,
Teresa
*RFC: LLVM Assembly format for ThinLTO