search for: ver1

Hi All Just like to know if some one got or has running a "VIA 6410 IDE RAID Controller" with centos 4(.1) I have a server I need to get install, that has this on-board I have even test the with Knoppix 3.8 and it don't not pick it up at all. but the card and the drivers work ok ( tested this with the bart PE (XP) cd ) See BUG. "That's not a bug,

...ure about the versioning of libguestfs, but I believe that it is not preferable that the versioning issue of rust bindings affects the whole versioning of libguestfs. Though it is available to hack SemanticVersioning by using suffixes(as we discussed before), maybe it is not preferable like 1.40.0-ver1. So, I think the versioning of rust bindings should be independent of the one of libguestfs. Do you agree, or not? Regards, Hiroyuki

...cember 1999 by Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org> +# Revised 15 December 1999 by Jim Monty <monty@primenet.com> + + AC_PROG_AWK + xmms_got_version=[` $AWK ' \ +BEGIN { \ + print vercmp(ARGV[1], ARGV[2]); \ +} \ + \ +function vercmp(ver1, ver2, ver1arr, ver2arr, \ + ver1len, ver2len, \ + ver1int, ver2int, len, i, p) { \ + \ + ver1len = split(ver1, ver1arr, /\./); \ + ver2len = split(ver2, ver2arr, /\./); \ + \ + len = ver1len > ver...

...of libguestfs, > but I believe that it is not preferable that the versioning issue of rust > bindings affects the whole versioning of libguestfs. > > Though it is available to hack SemanticVersioning by using suffixes(as we > discussed before), maybe it is not preferable like 1.40.0-ver1. > > So, I think the versioning of rust bindings should be independent of the > one of libguestfs. > > Do you agree, or not? It's up to you, but it seems like there ought to be some connection to the stable version. For example that a particular version of the bindings is com...

Hi, I am currently implementing SSH ver1 client for my school work and testing it with OpenSSH servers. Unfortunately I cannot execute commands after succesful login without allocate pty. My client send SSH_CMSG_EXEC_SHELL packet on server, but dont receive any answer. According RFC defined SSH1, server should send SSH_SMSG_SUCCES...

...n I try, I receive the subject message. I see in 'top' that rsync runs up about 150MB in memory usage prior to the msg. The machine running rsync has 2G ram, and is lightly loaded. My source server has "/top/release/platform/build" where /top is the filesystem, release is ver1, ver2, ver3...vern, platform is aix, nt, sun..., build is 010824, 010823...; I'd like to rsync at the release level, but run out of memory. Currently, I have a script that traverses into the release/platform directory and rsync -a. It works, but I get accumulation because the --delete op...

...d4/SpZgmLnW89/DcW+0kT6jZTt/VJ+6QbzHRbAJfXbN0muKltgvGPlq i/XpLUDp47/JzOsjXvtR5Eg08Ugc6dMGCkMOml9QH1FGbWOvdosZpU7TtsSntlef2VmG+nQf ESKl9S/57x2rH/byvW1qfrOeeX1aYZuxHX1C0dTORbuxNoz0WQSu+bX0qTdQ6jN89IcnVW28 bYqejpOPqG60fr3Ipqmwxuj655361DPFOUf6tHmMDsU2Rfr40eFubD519Jm150PqU9w4/eye 0KfT71R9/BJ7377KSrWsjj4z+VeR1/udJajR40OxTc3SA33CeDbzOqYLqO7Uk9+alsdz5Jyh M4v4vC4/KD75sWnbEWoZNO+YZdAkl9j5MtLas1XvIi/dcJnB2w/TobMENVoeyvyjY/bIlAOl aQ5TDXa9irw8nlP1kU8luw3qBePut88v12+3PvOzDJuCB6+uwM2eWhjzcDYjustSG2RHxfqs n/ShTDw63DLFkXV3Y1n8BsjEg1nWzTyi0h8/aX34pW75otEVx3Z3sX2razX3GsC2iX4ibKd5 xyz7mlwPvx7RavJzl1He9Ux+mXZPiz8BOzrsE...

...if ((pid=do_fork()) == 0) { *************** *** 464,469 **** --- 565,575 ---- io_set_error_fd(-1); kill(pid, SIGUSR2); wait_process(pid, &status); + + if (run_postscript(flist) != 0) { + exit_cleanup(RERR_POSTSCRIPT); + } + return status; } Only in rsync-2.5.6: main.c.ver1 Only in rsync-2.5.6: Makefile Common subdirectories: rsync-2.5.6.orig/packaging and rsync-2.5.6/packaging Common subdirectories: rsync-2.5.6.orig/patches and rsync-2.5.6/patches Common subdirectories: rsync-2.5.6.orig/popt and rsync-2.5.6/popt diff --exclude='*.o' -b --context rsync-2.5.6.o...