search for: venkatraman

Instead of just upcasing them, can we add prefix ARCH_? --Venkatraman On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Eric Christopher<echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I think I should rename the constants to be a little less likely to >> collide. I think just upcasing them mi...

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > That's really cool! Should we add note to Release Notes? Definitely. I will add a note mentioning about this in ReleaseNotes.rst. > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju > <venkatra at cs.wisc.edu> wrote: >> Thanks to Jakob's work on Sparcv9 ABI in Clang and recent changes to >> Sparc code generator, I am happy to announce that Clang can self host >> itself on Linux/Sparc64 and on FreeBSD/Sparc64. >> >> However...

I would prefer not to; they already live in a protected namespace, so there is no need to mangle them except to protect them from exuberant preprocessor defines, and this would be slightly out of style with other public uses of enumerations in LLVM. - Daniel On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Venkatraman Govindaraju<venkatra at cs.wisc.edu> wrote: > Instead of just upcasing them, can we add prefix ARCH_? > > --Venkatraman > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Eric Christopher<echristo at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:...

...?quicksearch=sparc > > This bug looks pretty fatal if it is actually real: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10938 > I can not reproduce this bug in the current trunk. It may already be fixed by the revision r122607. I also volunteer to fix any issues with Sparc backend. Thanks, Venkatraman

...ning builders on them? If so, what are the procedures to do that? Note that clang still does not work when it is build as a 32-bit binary, mainly due to the alignment issues in Clang. Also, Clang does not work out of box on Solaris/Sparc yet, due to the lack of support for its toolchain. Thanks, Venkatraman

...sparc" as a macro in sparc machines that expands to 1 (see below) but Triple.h defines "sparc" as a enum constant. $ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep sparc #define sparc 1 #define __sparc__ 1 #define __sparc 1 The attached patch fixes this problem by renaming sparc to sparc_. Thanks, Venkatraman -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm-compile-in-sparc.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 4049 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090824/ec581f9b/attachment.obj>

On 1/20/11 12:27 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju wrote: Just out of curiosity, have either of you considered writing an LLVM transform that simply replaces these call instructions with inline assembly code that does what you want? If that works, it seems much simpler than modifying/enhancing the code generator. -- John T. >...

...@foo() nounwind tail call void (...)* @bar() nounwind ret void } declare i32 @foo(...) declare void @bar(...) $ llc -march=sparc -O0 call.ll Instruction uses an allocated register UNREACHABLE executed at /scratch/venkatra/projects/llvm/src/llvm/lib/CodeGen/RegAllocFast.cpp:339! ... Thanks, Venkatraman

...to encode the registers into the "number". For instance, if the call instruction is %result = call i32 @foo(i32 %a) and the result is assigned to register %l0 and the variable "a" to register %l1, then I encode all foo, %l0 and %l1 and generate a sethi instruction. thanks, Venkatraman On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:31 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 1/20/11 12:27 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, have either of you considered writing an LLVM > transform that simply replaces these call instructions with inline...

Hi Venkatraman, > The current version in SVN fails to compile in sparc machines since > gcc defines "sparc" as a macro in sparc machines that expands to 1 > (see below) but Triple.h defines "sparc" as a enum constant. > > $ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep sparc > #define sparc...

I would like to take ownership of Target/Sparc, if no one objects. Thanks, Venkatraman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121121/53828f4b/attachment.html>

...* Coordinates extraction ('coords' function). The main feature of pROC is the comparison between two ROC curves. Three methods are currently implemented for both paired and unpaired ROC curves: * Bootstrap for full and partial AUC and smoothed ROC curves * DeLong [1] method for full AUC * Venkatraman [2, 3]. Confidence intervals can be computed with bootstrap for both empirical or smoothed ROC curves: * partial or full AUC (also with DeLong [1] method for full AUC) * ROC coordinates (thresholds, sensitivity or specificity). You can find more information in our paper [4] and on pROC website: h...

I reported bugs in "rhyper" and the TASKS.OLD file claims that they have been fixed. But R continues to get stuck (the prompt never comes back) if I use rhyper with N1, N2, n large, for example "rhyper(5,200,250,60)". E. S. Venkatraman (venkat at biosta.mskcc.org) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !)...

Hi All: Has anyone analyzed Illumina 550K data using DNAcopy package? I have around 2300 samples. According to Venkatraman and Olshen 2007 paper, it needs about 25 min to run a single sample for Affymetrix 100K. I am afraid it will take too long to analyzed my data. Anybody has an idea? Thanks! Best, -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DNAcopy-package-in-R-tp23158907p23158907.html Sent from the R...

...* Coordinates extraction ('coords' function). The main feature of pROC is the comparison between two ROC curves. Three methods are currently implemented for both paired and unpaired ROC curves: * Bootstrap for full and partial AUC and smoothed ROC curves * DeLong [1] method for full AUC * Venkatraman [2, 3]. Confidence intervals can be computed with bootstrap for both empirical or smoothed ROC curves: * partial or full AUC (also with DeLong [1] method for full AUC) * ROC coordinates (thresholds, sensitivity or specificity). You can find more information in our paper [4] and on pROC website: h...

At 10:37 PM 5/1/00 -0400, E. S. Venkatraman wrote: >I have the following problem. I have survival data (time, status) along >with several covariates (X1, X2,..., Xn). I want to fit a Cox model for >each of the covariate (univariately) and obtain the fitted probability of >survival at a fixed time point t0 and covariate value Xi...

On Jan 7, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju wrote: > When I run LLC with option "-O0 -march=sparc" on following testcase, > fast register allocator crashes with "UNREACHABLE executed" error. LLC > generates code successfully with other standard register allocators > available. I haven't invest...

...e- numeric residuals 24 -none- numeric intercept 1 -none- logical qr 6 -none- list > ls.print(lsfit(hyeung[,1],hyeung[,2])) trace: ls.print(lsfit(hyeung[, 1], hyeung[, 2])) Error: missing value in ``n1 : n2'' ------------------------------------------------- E. S. Venkatraman (venkat at biosta.mskcc.org) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !)...

...e- numeric residuals 24 -none- numeric intercept 1 -none- logical qr 6 -none- list > ls.print(lsfit(hyeung[,1],hyeung[,2])) trace: ls.print(lsfit(hyeung[, 1], hyeung[, 2])) Error: missing value in ``n1 : n2'' ------------------------------------------------- E. S. Venkatraman (venkat at biosta.mskcc.org) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !)...

Hello, What is your LLVM version? Also, can you attach the assembly generated? Thanks, Venkatraman On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Christine Cheng <clcheng at stanford.edu> wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> Thanks for the input. However, it seems that the code still...