search for: venkatra

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > That's really cool! Should we add note to Release Notes? Definitely. I will add a note mentioning about this in ReleaseNotes.rst. > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju > <venkatra at cs.wisc.edu> wrote: >> Thanks to Jakob's work on Sparcv9 ABI in Clang and recent changes to >> Sparc code generator, I am happy to announce that Clang can self host >> itself on Linux/Sparc64 and on FreeBSD/Sparc64. >> >> Howe...

...ning builders on them? If so, what are the procedures to do that? Note that clang still does not work when it is build as a 32-bit binary, mainly due to the alignment issues in Clang. Also, Clang does not work out of box on Solaris/Sparc yet, due to the lack of support for its toolchain. Thanks, Venkatraman

I would prefer not to; they already live in a protected namespace, so there is no need to mangle them except to protect them from exuberant preprocessor defines, and this would be slightly out of style with other public uses of enumerations in LLVM. - Daniel On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Venkatraman Govindaraju<venkatra at cs.wisc.edu> wrote: > Instead of just upcasing them, can we add prefix ARCH_? > > --Venkatraman > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Eric Christopher<echristo at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Daniel Dunbar wro...

Instead of just upcasing them, can we add prefix ARCH_? --Venkatraman On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Eric Christopher<echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I think I should rename the constants to be a little less likely to >> collide. I think just upcasing them...

Hi Christine, > I am using LLVM 2.8 and llvm-gcc 4.2. Could you please try svn top-of-tree? Clang is also a better choice here. > The assembly files are attached. In the assembly file, the erroneous result > is associated with 'subcc', while the correct ones are associated with 'or'. -- Bruno Cardoso Lopes http://www.brunocardoso.cc

I can't reproduce this problem with the recent svn trunk. LLVM 2.9 has lots of fixes for Sparc back-end. So, please at least try with LLVM-2.9. Thanks, On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Christine, > >> I am using LLVM 2.8 and llvm-gcc 4.2. > > Could you please try svn top-of-tree? Clang is also a better

I would like to take ownership of Target/Sparc, if no one objects. Thanks, Venkatraman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121121/53828f4b/attachment.html>

...lesalscheider,papin_g,pcc,predmond,rafael,rdivacky,redstar,rengolin,resistor,revane,ributzka,rikka,rkotler,rlytton,rmitton,rnk,row,rsandifo,rsmith,rtrieu,rudkx,ruiu,samsonov,sbaranga,sbenza,sdt,sepavloff,shuxin_yang,silvas,stephenwlin,stoklund,sylvestre,tasiraj,timurrrr,tnorthover,tstellar,uweigand,venkatra,vmedic,void,whunt,wpan,wschmidt,ygao,yjiang > > BUILD FAILED: failed compile > > sincerely, > -The Buildbot > > >

...cat call.ll define void @test() nounwind { entry: %0 = tail call i32 (...)* @foo() nounwind tail call void (...)* @bar() nounwind ret void } declare i32 @foo(...) declare void @bar(...) $ llc -march=sparc -O0 call.ll Instruction uses an allocated register UNREACHABLE executed at /scratch/venkatra/projects/llvm/src/llvm/lib/CodeGen/RegAllocFast.cpp:339! ... Thanks, Venkatraman

Hi Venkatraman, I am using LLVM 2.8 and llvm-gcc 4.2. The assembly files are attached. In the assembly file, the erroneous result is associated with 'subcc', while the correct ones are associated with 'or'. Thanks a lot! Christine On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju &l...

Hello, What is your LLVM version? Also, can you attach the assembly generated? Thanks, Venkatraman On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Christine Cheng <clcheng at stanford.edu> wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> Thanks for the input. However, it seems that the code sti...

...?quicksearch=sparc > > This bug looks pretty fatal if it is actually real: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10938 > I can not reproduce this bug in the current trunk. It may already be fixed by the revision r122607. I also volunteer to fix any issues with Sparc backend. Thanks, Venkatraman

...sparc" as a macro in sparc machines that expands to 1 (see below) but Triple.h defines "sparc" as a enum constant. $ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep sparc #define sparc 1 #define __sparc__ 1 #define __sparc 1 The attached patch fixes this problem by renaming sparc to sparc_. Thanks, Venkatraman -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm-compile-in-sparc.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 4049 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090824/ec581f9b/attachment.obj>

...ot;functions with particular type" ( eg. p0, p1) to the intrinsic. 3. Create a instruction pattern in SparcInstrInfo.td that matches the intrinsic. From the arguments to the intrinsic function, encode the "<number>" and output a "sethi" instruction. Thanks, Venkatraman On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Raghu Prabhakar <raghu at cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > Hello all, > > I am trying to modify the Sparc backend to do something for my team's project, to do the following. > > Whenever the backend encounters a call to one particular type of fun...

...to encode the registers into the "number". For instance, if the call instruction is %result = call i32 @foo(i32 %a) and the result is assigned to register %l0 and the variable "a" to register %l1, then I encode all foo, %l0 and %l1 and generate a sethi instruction. thanks, Venkatraman On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:31 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 1/20/11 12:27 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, have either of you considered writing an LLVM > transform that simply replaces these call instructions with inli...