search for: venkateswaran

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Raja Venkateswaran <rajav at codeaurora.org> wrote: > I think we need a group of maintainers rather than a single maintainer given > the spectrum of ARM targets/ISAs/platforms required to support There have been a plethora of ARM Instruction Set Architecture variants over the years. Which ones do we exp...

...ase qualification when they might not be available. I think what we usually do is for the release manager to gather a group of volunteered. These are the folks who are responsible for qualification the targets of their interests on their preferred platform. Evan On Oct 13, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Raja Venkateswaran wrote: > I think we need a group of maintainers rather than a single maintainer given the spectrum of ARM targets/ISAs/platforms required to support and the amount of people/system resources required. I & my team plan to actively participate in the bug-fixing process during the release cycl...

...s and they are quite different on arm-darwin. Other areas of ARM work probably aren't as likely to need to test on arm-darwin outside of Apple. deep On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Don Quixote de la Mancha <quixote at dulcineatech.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Raja Venkateswaran > <rajav at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> I think we need a group of maintainers rather than a single maintainer given >> the spectrum of ARM targets/ISAs/platforms required to support > > There have been a plethora of ARM Instruction Set Architecture > variants over the y...

I think we need a group of maintainers rather than a single maintainer given the spectrum of ARM targets/ISAs/platforms required to support and the amount of people/system resources required. I & my team plan to actively participate in the bug-fixing process during the release cycle. If we can divide the bugs among the maintainers and establish a requirement that all open ARM bugs must be

...ase qualification when they might not be available. I think what we usually do is for the release manager to gather a group of volunteered. These are the folks who are responsible for qualification the targets of their interests on their preferred platform. Evan On Oct 13, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Raja Venkateswaran wrote: I think we need a group of maintainers rather than a single maintainer given the spectrum of ARM targets/ISAs/platforms required to support and the amount of people/system resources required. I & my team plan to actively participate in the bug-fixing process during the release cycle. If...

On Oct 13, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Raja Venkateswaran wrote: > I think we need a group of maintainers rather than a single maintainer given the spectrum of ARM targets/ISAs/platforms required to support and the amount of people/system resources required. I & my team plan to actively participate in the bug-fixing process during the release cycl...

Hi, I'm trying to run a command as follows: rsync -Lcav temp.txt datauser@mach1:\$DATESPATH/dat The above returns the following err: "mkstemp /dat/.temp.txt.oYaO9U failed: No such file or directory" $DATESPATH is a variable defined in 'datauser's profile, but it looks like the variable is not recognized in the context of this command. I have used something similar

...ted by "Palm Source". + Recording using LDTP This new version of LDTP features a recorder tool which would help in generating automation scripts automatically by recording user events. This would greatly reduce the time required for creating and maintaining automation scripts. Thanks to Venkateswaran ('whacko'), Harishankaran ('sp2hari') and Theyagarajan ('Taggy') for making this happen. For more information on this please refer to http://ldtp.freedesktop.org/wiki/RecordHOWTO + Bug fixes This version includes loads of bug fixes to address important issues like memory l...

"Raja Venkateswaran" <rajav at codeaurora.org> writes: > I think we need to think along two dimensions - Breadth of testing and depth > of testing > > 1. Breadth: What the best supported ARM ISA versions in LLVM ARM? Say its > armv6 and armv7; We need to > - regression test ARM mode, Th...

...... ============================ + Recording using LDTP This new version of LDTP features a recorder tool which would help in generating automation scripts automatically by recording user events. This would greatly reduce the time required for creating and maintaining automation scripts. Thanks to Venkateswaran ('whacko'), Harishankaran ('sp2hari') and Theyagarajan ('Taggy') for making this happen. For more information on this please refer to http://ldtp.freedesktop.org/wiki/RecordHOWTO + Integration with Tinderbox - LDTP has been integrated with the GNOME jhbuild. Using this feat...

Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which

Hi, It goes without saying that I +1 this. Cheers, James -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Raja Venkateswaran Sent: 11 October 2011 17:46 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer I am very interested in seeing a qualification plan for ARM given that it is a widely used target with several combinations of options/modes to be tested. I & my team use ARM hardware fo...

I think we need to think along two dimensions - Breadth of testing and depth of testing 1. Breadth: What the best supported ARM ISA versions in LLVM ARM? Say its armv6 and armv7; We need to - regression test ARM mode, Thumb-2 and Thumb-1 mode (armv6) - Performance/code-size test ARM mode, Thumb-2 and Thumb-1 modes We need to agree on an optimization level for regression as well as

I am very interested in seeing a qualification plan for ARM given that it is a widely used target with several combinations of options/modes to be tested. I & my team use ARM hardware for running tests and we run all LLVM test suite tests as part of qualification process. I had started a similar conversation in llvm-commits, but this is probably the right forum. It will save everyone a lot of

I am very interested in seeing a qualification plan for ARM given that it is a widely used target with several combinations of options/modes to be tested. I & my team use ARM hardware for running tests and we run all test LLVM test suite tests as part of qualification process. I had started a similar conversation in llvm-commits, but this is probably the right forum. It will save everyone a

...urations. And the tests tend to run a bit slower than, say, an x86 chip. So it's mostly a matter of time and resources. Unless we can get people who are willing to perform these tests, we won't be able to release ARM as an official supported platform. -bw On Oct 11, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Raja Venkateswaran wrote: > I am very interested in seeing a qualification plan for ARM given that it is > a widely used target with several combinations of options/modes to be > tested. I & my team use ARM hardware for running tests and we run all test > LLVM test suite tests as part of qualificatio...