search for: venez

On Sat, 18 Apr 2020, Lo?c wrote: > Hi, > > In order to help catching those regressions, here is a new regression > test file. Thanks for catching my mistake and thanks even more for writing a regression test. Both the fix and a slightly-tweaked version of your regress test have been committed. -d

...utilisateurs de Ruby on Rails est n? ? Lausanne en Suisse. (http://railsbee.ch). La premi?re rencontre aura lieu le mercredi 17 mai ? La Strada, rue des Terreaux 22 ? Lausanne ? 20h30. Merci de s''inscrire sur la mailing list pour les reservations (http://groups.google.com/group/railsbee) Venez nombreux partager votre experience sur Ruby on Rails ! A+ Seb -- Sebastien Hugues Open Source & Web Consultant EasyBox Technologies www.easybox.ch Rue des Terreaux 7 CH-1003 Lausanne Switzerland Tel: + 41 21 312 58 66 Fax: + 41 21 312 58 65

Hi Le 17/04/2020 ? 05:52, Damien Miller a ?crit?: > On Wed, 15 Apr 2020, Lo?c wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> In one recent change >> (https://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.git/commit/?id=2b13d3934d5803703c04803ca3a93078ecb5b715), >> I noticed a regression. >> >> If ssh-keygen is given a private file without passphrase and without the >> corresponding

Hello, In one recent change (https://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.git/commit/?id=2b13d3934d5803703c04803ca3a93078ecb5b715), I noticed a regression. If ssh-keygen is given a private file without passphrase and without the corresponding .pub file, I doesn't extract the comment after the commit, while it did before: Before the commit: $ ./ssh-keygen -q -t dsa -N '' -C foobar -f

Add private key protection information extraction to shh-keygen using -v option on top of -y option which is already parsing the private key. Technically, the passphrase isn't necessary to do this, but it is the most logical thing to do for me. Adding this to -l option is not appropriate because fingerprinting is using the .pub file when available. An other idea is to add a new option, I