search for: venerable

hi there, I''m not sure if it is better to use the ml or the forum so I ended to post on both ... I''m trying to login into a page that is using javascript to set a cookie: <script language="JavaScript"> {text "\n" " \n" " \n" " document.cookie = ''vhp_js=v995105608h85339294p;path=/;domain=.venere.com;expire=0'';

Tim Evans wrote: > I have an original-label Infrant (now NetGear) ReadyNAS storage > appliance that's been running for 8+ years. Except for replacing its > power supply, it has not skipped a beat in all this time. > > I use it primarily as a backup device (via NFS) for a couple of Linux > machines, (via SMB) for a couple of Windows PC's, and (via ftp) for web > sites

On 11/18/2015 11:50 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > What size storage are you looking at, and what's your budget? Are we > talking a 4TB drive, or 33TB, or...? Sorry, should've mentioned this is for home/home office. The ReadyNAS is a four-bay unit, with 500GB disks. Will want a four-bay, probably with 1- or 2-TB disks. -- Tim Evans | 5 Chestnut Court UNIX System Admin

On 11/18/2015 07:31 AM, Tim Evans wrote: > Would like to hear recommendations here. https://www.ixsystems.com/freenas-mini/

We're using Synology boxes with good results so far. They're built on Linux with ssh access and good support for things like rsync. They have options to backup to remote servers including Amazon too. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, Tim Evans wrote: > I have an original-label Infrant (now NetGear) ReadyNAS storage > appliance that's been running for 8+ years. Except for replacing its

Once upon a time, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> said: > - They?re serious server-grade machines, not borderline flimsy boxes competing largely on price. Built in and supported from Silicon Valley, not China. :) iXsystems sells rebadged SuperMicro stuff, nothing special (not made in Silicon Valley). We bought an iXsystems TrueNAS (commercial version of FreeNAS +

On 11/18/2015 11:55 AM, Warren Young wrote: > It?s rather annoying to buy a NAS, then later realize you need to buy*another* NAS as a mirror in case the first one roaches itself. Isn?t that what redundant storage is supposed to avoid? no, RAID is purely availability when faced with single or double drive failure, nothing else. classic raid is most certainly NOT about data integrity, as

Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 18, 2015, at 1:01 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: >> >> On 11/18/2015 11:55 AM, Warren Young wrote: >>> It?s rather annoying to buy a NAS, then later realize you need to >>> buy*another* NAS as a mirror in case the first one roaches itself. >>> Isn?t that what redundant storage is supposed to avoid?

--On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 10:31:36 AM -0500 Tim Evans <tkevans at tkevans.com> wrote: > Would like to hear recommendations here. Besides the ReadyNAS, I have > worked with a Thecus NAS (don't recall model). What are the features I > should look at? For reasons that others have already touched on, I like FreeNAS, as long as you're using the base system. I have

On 11/18/2015 04:42 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > the /really/ hard one when rolling your own highly redundant systems > with high data integrity needed for things like transactional database > servers, is implementing redundant storage controllers with shared > writeback cache... you pretty much have to get into EMC class > hardware for this level of reliability with data

On Nov 18, 2015, at 1:01 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > > On 11/18/2015 11:55 AM, Warren Young wrote: >> It?s rather annoying to buy a NAS, then later realize you need to buy*another* NAS as a mirror in case the first one roaches itself. Isn?t that what redundant storage is supposed to avoid? > > > no, RAID is purely availability when faced with

I configured tinc on my little server, but i get this when i try to run it: root@blacky:~# tincd -n venere -d5 -D tincd 1.0.4 (Apr 30 2006 22:53:06) starting, debug level 5 /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tun mode) Executing script tinc-up Listening on :: port 655 Can't bind to 0.0.0.0 port 655/tcp: Address already in use Ready I don't understand what's wrong.. I hope

On Nov 18, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote: > > Once upon a time, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> said: >> - They?re serious server-grade machines, not borderline flimsy boxes competing largely on price. Built in and supported from Silicon Valley, not China. :) > > iXsystems sells rebadged SuperMicro stuff, nothing special (not made

On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11/18/2015 07:31 AM, Tim Evans wrote: >> Would like to hear recommendations here. > > https://www.ixsystems.com/freenas-mini/ For those who don?t know why you?d pay $1000 for a diskless 4-bay NAS box when there are $300-500 boxes that are superficially similar from QNAP, Synology,

...ent, it mentions one of the features of the update being: " Security enhancements includingCVE-2011-1583 <http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-1583>" However, the aforementioned CVE seems to only apply to other versions of Xen (3.4.x is missing in the list of venerable software) While I''m obviously happy that the latest release is free of this bug, can someone please shed some light on how this bug was fixed in 3.4.4, when it wasn''t supposed to be present in the first place in 3.4.3? Also, what other security-related bugs have been fixed? It...

R- Users: Can someone indicate what I am during wrong? This is a script essentially from Venerable & Ripley's text on interpolating a surface with loess function but I can not get it to run. Thanks. John Lewis Professor McGill University Montreal library(MASS) library(modreg) data(topo) par(mfcol=c(2,2), pty="s") topo.loess <- loess(z ~ x * y, topo, degree=2, spa...

My apologies (again!) for asking about this old, venerable release. The client is upgrading to 4.10 or 4.11 in early December. The AIX server was joined to a functional Windows 2000 domain in 2015. The AD server has since been upgraded to functional Windows Server 2003 sometime since. They have 2 AD servers - primary is Joe, secondary is Jane. J...

Hi, Can anybody help me out, how to manage or limit bandwidth through iptables while having internet connection on eth0 and working as a gateway in LAN. Thnaks in Advance. Vikram _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

2017-03-12 4:02 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 7:15 PM, David Baker <david at baker.im> wrote: > > Hi Arnaud & Charles, > > > Hi Dave, any news on your side from this venerable ESV+? -- Arno > You?ll have to forgive my low level of Linux Understanding here?. > > > > > > > > I downloaded the source files, modified the appropriate driver file, > > re-compiled it (all of this was a lot of research and learning!) > > > > > &gt...

Hello Asterisk users, We are having MANY but MANY problems configuring an analog fax machine to work properly on Asterisk, the first thing we do was to plug in the Fax analog machine to the FXS port of the Digium TDM410P, we set echocancel=no on zapata.conf and also faxdetect=yes on general section, but our Asterisk CRASH every time we try to send/receive fax! We are using Asterisk 1.4.21 and