Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "vehiclemak".
Did you mean:
vehiclemake
2006 Feb 03
0
Instantiating multiple child objects
...;%= text_field ''Person.VehicleRegistrations[]'', ''licenseNumber'' %>
<%= text_field ''Person.VehicleRegistrations[]'', ''vehicleManufacturer'' %>
<%= text_field ''Person.VehicleRegistrations[]'', ''vehicleMake'' %>
<%= text_field ''Person.VehicleRegistrations[]'', ''licenseNumber'' %>
<%= text_field ''Person.VehicleRegistrations[]'', ''vehicleManufacturer'' %>
<%= text_field ''Person.VehicleRegistrations[]...
2006 Feb 03
2
_form rendering question for adding multiple child objects
...;%= text_field ''Person.VehicleRegistrations[]'', ''licenseNumber'' %>
<%= text_field ''Person.VehicleRegistrations[]'', ''vehicleManufacturer'' %>
<%= text_field ''Person.VehicleRegistrations[]'', ''vehicleMake'' %>
<%= text_field ''Person.VehicleRegistrations[]'', ''licenseNumber'' %>
<%= text_field ''Person.VehicleRegistrations[]'', ''vehicleManufacturer'' %>
<%= text_field ''Person.VehicleRegistrations[]...
2006 Jul 04
7
inverse of eval() ?
I''m trying to figure out how to turn a string into an object. Can anyone point me? Here''s some background.
Here''s the part of what I''m trying to do that works.
-------------------------------------
@ford = [''mustang'', ''pinto'']
make = ''@ford''
puts eval(make)
--> produces
mustang
pinto
2010 Nov 23
6
[LLVMdev] draft rule for naming types/functions/variables
...ere you want something descriptive.
>
> For example, naming a variable i here is perfectly fine:
>
> for (unsigned i = 0; i != 100; ++i)
> A[i] = 0;
>
> Naming it "ArrayIndex" would not make it more clear :)
Good point. I actually have this in the example:
828 VehicleMaker m; // Bad (abbreviation and non-descriptive); might be
829 // OK for a local variable if its role is obvious.
I'll reword the rule to match what you have in mind.
> For capitalization, I generally prefer capital names with the exception being one character names tha...
2010 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] draft rule for naming types/functions/variables
...>> For example, naming a variable i here is perfectly fine:
>>
>> for (unsigned i = 0; i != 100; ++i)
>> A[i] = 0;
>>
>> Naming it "ArrayIndex" would not make it more clear :)
>
> Good point. I actually have this in the example:
>
> 828 VehicleMaker m; // Bad (abbreviation and non-descriptive); might be
> 829 // OK for a local variable if its role is obvious.
>
> I'll reword the rule to match what you have in mind.
I've made the change and uploaded the new patch to
http://codereview.appspot.com/3264041...
2010 Nov 29
8
[LLVMdev] draft rule for naming types/functions/variables
...e is perfectly fine:
> >>
> >> for (unsigned i = 0; i != 100; ++i)
> >> A[i] = 0;
> >>
> >> Naming it "ArrayIndex" would not make it more clear :)
> >
> > Good point. I actually have this in the example:
> >
> > 828 VehicleMaker m; // Bad (abbreviation and non-descriptive); might
> be
> > 829 // OK for a local variable if its role is
> obvious.
> >
> > I'll reword the rule to match what you have in mind.
>
> I've made the change and uploaded the new patch to
>...