Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "vdv".
Did you mean:
  vdev
  
2011 Oct 29
2
Issues with Xorcom astribanks when running Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) as a quemu/libvirt guest
Hi,
Xorcom astribanks get initialized straight on when using Ubuntu 11.10
packages but I am having a hard time to get the same result running in a
qemu/libvirt image.
The first difficulty is that astribanks devices get different usb device
ids during their initialisation process, requiring hot plug support.
I have figured out how to solve this issue using the technique described
in this post :
2020 Jul 28
0
[PATCH V4 3/6] vDPA: add get_vq_irq() in vdpa_config_ops
...ice
>    *				@vdev: vdpa device
> @@ -178,6 +183,7 @@ struct vdpa_config_ops {
>   	u64 (*get_vq_state)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx);
>   	struct vdpa_notification_area
>   	(*get_vq_notification)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx);
> +	u32 (*get_vq_irq)(struct vdpa_device *vdv, u16 idx);
>   
>   	/* Device ops */
>   	u32 (*get_vq_align)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
1999 Dec 20
1
2.0.6: very hard overload after upgrade from 2.0.5a
hi*&
ppl, what I see?
smbstat shows this:
veda         uucp     uucp     17012   vdv      (193.168.6.84) Sun Dec 19
14:33:43 1999
squid-wate   piv      guest    19110   nlv      (193.168.6.74) Mon Dec 20
08:51:18 1999
squid-nav    paul     wheel    19110   nlv      (193.168.6.74) Mon Dec 20
08:51:42 1999
nlv          nlv      guest    19110   nlv      (193.168.6.74) Mon Dec 20
09:1...
2020 Aug 05
0
[PATCH V4 linux-next 08/12] vdpa: Modify get_vq_state() to return error code
...> -			     struct vdpa_vq_state *state);
> +	int (*get_vq_state)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx,
> +			    struct vdpa_vq_state *state);
>   	struct vdpa_notification_area
>   	(*get_vq_notification)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx);
>   	int (*get_vq_irq)(struct vdpa_device *vdv, u16 idx);
2011 Feb 01
2
better way to iterate matrix multiplication?
I'm simulating a Markov process using a vector of proportions. Each 
value in the vector represents the proportion of the population who are 
in a particular state (so the vector sums to 1). I have a square matrix 
of transition probabilities, and for each tick of the Markov clock the 
vector is multiplied by the transition matrix.
To illustrate the sort of thing I mean:
pm <-
2009 Nov 13
1
Xorcom Astribank udev issue in Ubuntu 9.10
...th 0
Nov 14 00:44:41 asterisk udevd[452]: seq 1516 done with 0
I have tried with the version of dahdi that comes with Ubuntu 9.10 and I
am now trying with the svn version of dahdi with no more success.
Does anyone have an idea how I can solve this issue?
Thanks,
Eric
-- 
Eric van der Vlist <vdv at dyomedea.com>
Dyomedea (http://dyomedea.com)
2020 Sep 15
0
[RFC PATCH 00/22] Enhance VHOST to enable SoC-to-SoC communication
...state)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx,
> 			    struct vdpa_vq_state *state);
> 	struct vdpa_notification_area
> 	(*get_vq_notification)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx);
> 	/* vq irq is not expected to be changed once DRIVER_OK is set */
> 	int (*get_vq_irq)(struct vdpa_device *vdv, u16 idx);
>
> 	/* Device ops */
> 	u32 (*get_vq_align)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
> 	u64 (*get_features)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
> 	int (*set_features)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64 features);
> 	void (*set_config_cb)(struct vdpa_device *vdev,
> 			      struct vdpa_callbac...
2020 Sep 18
0
[RFC PATCH 00/22] Enhance VHOST to enable SoC-to-SoC communication
...>>>>>  ?????struct vdpa_notification_area
>>>>>  ?????(*get_vq_notification)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx);
>>>>>  ?????/* vq irq is not expected to be changed once DRIVER_OK is set */
>>>>>  ?????int (*get_vq_irq)(struct vdpa_device *vdv, u16 idx);
>>>>>
>>>>>  ?????/* Device ops */
>>>>>  ?????u32 (*get_vq_align)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
>>>>>  ?????u64 (*get_features)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
>>>>>  ?????int (*set_features)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u6...
2009 Nov 15
2
Sip incoming call issue with Asterisk 1.6
...od thing or not, I doubt I can convince Free
(http://free.fr) which is one of the biggest ISPs in France to change
their policy so that I can receive SIP calls again...
If my diagnostic is right, is there a way to work around this issue with
asterisk 1.6?
Thanks,
Eric
-- 
Eric van der Vlist <vdv at dyomedea.com>
Dyomedea (http://dyomedea.com)
2020 Sep 16
0
[RFC PATCH 00/22] Enhance VHOST to enable SoC-to-SoC communication
...????? struct vdpa_vq_state *state);
>>>  ????struct vdpa_notification_area
>>>  ????(*get_vq_notification)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx);
>>>  ????/* vq irq is not expected to be changed once DRIVER_OK is set */
>>>  ????int (*get_vq_irq)(struct vdpa_device *vdv, u16 idx);
>>>
>>>  ????/* Device ops */
>>>  ????u32 (*get_vq_align)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
>>>  ????u64 (*get_features)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
>>>  ????int (*set_features)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64 features);
>>>  ????void (*set_co...
2020 Jul 02
11
[RFC PATCH 00/22] Enhance VHOST to enable SoC-to-SoC communication
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:51:21PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> This series enhances Linux Vhost support to enable SoC-to-SoC
> communication over MMIO. This series enables rpmsg communication between
> two SoCs using both PCIe RC<->EP and HOST1-NTB-HOST2
> 
> 1) Modify vhost to use standard Linux driver model
> 2) Add support in vring to access virtqueue over
2020 Jul 02
11
[RFC PATCH 00/22] Enhance VHOST to enable SoC-to-SoC communication
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:51:21PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> This series enhances Linux Vhost support to enable SoC-to-SoC
> communication over MMIO. This series enables rpmsg communication between
> two SoCs using both PCIe RC<->EP and HOST1-NTB-HOST2
> 
> 1) Modify vhost to use standard Linux driver model
> 2) Add support in vring to access virtqueue over
2006 Oct 09
1
Problem with routing
Hi All
I have the following setup
Users ------- Machine A ----------- Machine B ----------- Machine C
>From machine A to B:
Ipsec VPN
Allows 192.168.10.0/24 (Users) to connect to 192.168.20.0/24  (Network on
machine B)
>From machine B to C:
Ipsen VPN
Allows 196.44.33.118 to coccent to 192.168.241.65 (machine C)
I want to rewrite 192.168.20.33 to 192.168.241.65
This can be done
2012 Jun 13
3
Default Route disappear
Hi
I have a default route to 192.168.1.1 as soon as I start shorewall the
default route dissapear.  What do I need to do to have it not disappear.
Kind Regards
My network setup
/etc/network/interfaces:
# The primary network interface
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
        address 192.168.1.17
        netmask 255.255.255.0
        network 192.168.1.0
        broadcast 192.168.1.255