search for: vdcacpn1

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "vdcacpn1".

2024 Mar 24
3
'Scripted' machine account renewal?!
...ac.concordia-pordenone.it master_kdc = kdc.ad.ac.concordia-pordenone.it admin_server = kdc.ad.ac.concordia-pordenone.it default_domain = ad.ac.concordia-pordenone.it } clearly, 'kdc.ad.ac.concordia-pordenone.it' is in /etc/hosts: root at vfwacpn1:~# grep kdc /etc/hosts 10.172.1.8 vdcacpn1.ac.concordia-pordenone.it kdc.ad.ac.concordia-pordenone.it ad.ac.concordia-pordenone.it vdcacpn1 Join still seems valid: root at vfwacpn1:~# net ads testjoin get_kdc_ip_string: get_kdc_list fail NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS get_kdc_ip_string: get_kdc_list fail NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS Join is...
2024 Mar 04
1
'Scripted' machine account renewal?!
On 04-03-2024 21:54, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:14:18 +0100 > Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Mandi! Kees van Vloten via samba >> In chel di` si favelave... >> >>> Interesting, I tried running it with -d 10, it shows a lot of >>> output. >> The same. My output is a bit more
2024 Jun 06
1
'Scripted' machine account renewal?!
...kdc.ad.ac.concordia-pordenone.it > admin_server = kdc.ad.ac.concordia-pordenone.it > default_domain = ad.ac.concordia-pordenone.it > } > > clearly, 'kdc.ad.ac.concordia-pordenone.it' is in /etc/hosts: > > root at vfwacpn1:~# grep kdc /etc/hosts > 10.172.1.8 vdcacpn1.ac.concordia-pordenone.it kdc.ad.ac.concordia-pordenone.it ad.ac.concordia-pordenone.it vdcacpn1 > > Join still seems valid: > > root at vfwacpn1:~# net ads testjoin > get_kdc_ip_string: get_kdc_list fail NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS > get_kdc_ip_string: get_kdc_list fail NT_S...
2023 Nov 29
1
Setting up Profiles share... 777?!
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:45:16 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > >> acl_xattr:default acl style = windows > >> acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes > > Why have you added those two last lines ? > > Ahem, really you need an answer?! ;-) > >