search for: vcss

...#39;t stress this enough!!) while Aegis always struck me as more or less designed to _inhibit_ development! (It really does live up to its name on this point, trust me.) The differences can't _all_ be in my head, I hope! OK, I should at least _try_ to be objective. In contrast to the other VCSs I've used: - Perforce _just works_. By this I mean that it only ever takes effort to make it work _differently_, not to make it work _at all_. I don't want to start a flamewar and so won't mention other VCSs that could be contrasted here, but the differences are certainly there. Ge...

Time ago when the svn server was crawling due to massive hammering from people mirroring the repo, someone said that after the 2.6 release we could discuss creating official mirrors for those who work with svn clients based on distributed VCSs such as git and bazaar. Such mirrors increase productivity (facilitating experimentation and parallel tasks, allowing off-line work) and even lessens the workload of the svn server, as lots of expensive operations (log, annotate, bisecting, etc) are performed locally. There is a git mirror that w...

...at 8:30 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Time ago when the svn server was crawling due to massive hammering > from > people mirroring the repo, someone said that after the 2.6 release we > could discuss creating official mirrors for those who work with svn > clients based on distributed VCSs such as git and bazaar. > > Such mirrors increase productivity (facilitating experimentation and > parallel tasks, allowing off-line work) and even lessens the > workload of > the svn server, as lots of expensive operations (log, annotate, > bisecting, etc) are performed locally...

...> while Aegis always struck me as more or less designed to _inhibit_ > development! (It really does live up to its name on this point, trust > me.) The differences can't _all_ be in my head, I hope! > > OK, I should at least _try_ to be objective. In contrast to the other > VCSs I've used: > > - Perforce _just works_. By this I mean that it only ever takes > effort to make it work _differently_, not to make it work _at all_. I > don't want to start a flamewar and so won't mention other VCSs that > could be contrasted here, but the differen...

LLVMers, The oversight group has been kicking around the idea of getting a better version control system than CVS. The problem is, we're not quite sure what "better" means. So, we thought we'd ask your opinions. If you're interested in this topic (and you should be if you're actively developing), please have a look at this site:

...s that were taken were necessary. They would have happened if I used git or cvs or any other vcs. A comment saying 'this API is temporary for the migration between XXX and YYY' takes how long to write? Is your time really so valuable that this extra cost is too much? The comment on other VCSs seems irrelevant, but if you are making such invasive changes that they must be done in multiple passes then either a feature branch and a merge or a local git clone seem the correct ways of doing them. Dumping 3000 lines of changes in the tree in one go is preferable to leaving the tree in flux f...

...X and YYY' takes how long to write? Is your time really so valuable that this extra cost is too much? > If you look at the svn log messages, I did just that for temporary classes and APIs. I also had several "FIXMEs" in the code with comments like that. > The comment on other VCSs seems irrelevant, but if you are making such invasive changes that they must be done in multiple passes then either a feature branch and a merge or a local git clone seem the correct ways of doing them. Dumping 3000 lines of changes in the tree in one go is preferable to leaving the tree in flux f...

...Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > Time ago when the svn server was crawling due to massive hammering from > people mirroring the repo, someone said that after the 2.6 release we > could discuss creating official mirrors for those who work with svn > clients based on distributed VCSs such as git and bazaar. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100202/77517d44/attachment.html>

...</table> > > <p><i>NOTE:</i> Logos will need to be developed as well. If you have that > > talent, please send a JPEG/GIF to go with your name idea.</p> > > @@ -446,6 +454,6 @@ > > src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss" alt="Valid CSS!"></a> > > <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img > > src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401" alt="Valid HTML 4.01!"></a> > > -<br/>Last modified: $Date: 2007/04/1...

...hanged (and hence possibly corrupted) state while an update or commit is happening. Git implements atomic transactions by recording complete, discrete repository states that cannot be broken down into individual or smaller state changes. ***Support and encourage branched development*** Almost all VCSs can name different genealogies of development within a single project. For instance, one sequence of code changes could be called ?development? while another is referred to as ?test.? Each version control system can also split a single line of development into multiple lines and then unify, or merg...

...wrote: > >> Time ago when the svn server was crawling due to massive hammering >> from >> people mirroring the repo, someone said that after the 2.6 release we >> could discuss creating official mirrors for those who work with svn >> clients based on distributed VCSs such as git and bazaar. >> >> Such mirrors increase productivity (facilitating experimentation and >> parallel tasks, allowing off-line work) and even lessens the >> workload of >> the svn server, as lots of expensive operations (log, annotate, >> bisecting, e...

...t, etc versus SourceForge), bisects, branches, > remotes, hooks, workdir, submodules and all the new development seem > to be done on Git nowadays, not SVN. Windows may be an odd one related > to GUIs, but Visual Studio has Git integration and I hear it's similar > to the other MSVC VCSs. GitHub's desktop interface seems pretty cool, > too. > > * Web repositories make it *a lot* easier to create add-hoc pull > requests by non-developers, which could boost the number of > contributions and future contributors, as well as external projects > using LLVM componen...

On Feb 7, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > On Feb 7, 2013, at 12:14 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > >> The comment on other VCSs seems irrelevant, but if you are making such invasive changes that they must be done in multiple passes then either a feature branch and a merge or a local git clone seem the correct ways of doing them. Dumping 3000 lines of changes in the tree in one go is preferable to leaving the tree in flux f...

Hi, I was wondering if it is possible to put a dovecot managed maildir under a vcs like system, for example git or bzr. I'd like to have a seamless history of all mail going in and out of my mailboxes, so a vcs like system seams a good choice for me. I'm not quite sure however if that would cause any problems to dovecot and what the best way of handling commits would be. If anyone on the

UNBIASED FACTS: ? Bugzilla & R-devel Mailing Lists: Remain unchanged: Understood as Ticketing platforms for bug pull requests on the R-devel Git Repository. ? Git Repository Options: A) Github (Cloud with Automated backups from GitHub to CRAN Server): https://github.com B) Gitlab (Selfhosted on CRAN): https://about.gitlab.com C) Phabricator (Selfhosted on CRAN): https://www.phacility.com D)

...ReportedBy: jglick at apache.org QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org rsync includes the built-in --filter=:C which is great for archiving source trees containing CVS checkouts, but CVS is an obsolete VCS. There is no built-in equivalent for the more modern Git, Mercurial, or Subversion VCSs. As http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13713101/rsync-exclude-according-to-gitignore-like-cvs-exclude notes, --filter=':- .gitignore' seems to work pretty well for Git (though there are probably more advanced points of syntax that Git and rsync interpret differently); but --filter=':-...

...wrote: > I think the only reason is whether or not we want to encourage anything as > part of them or whether we want "llvm specific" commit > advice/instructions/etc where we want people to use these for sure. > > That said, git isn't the most command line friendly of VCSs for me so if > we want to have something that makes things just a little easier I'm down, > but would like to see what we expect them to do documented (here?) and ... > documented (on the web page). > > Thoughts? > > -eric > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:25 PM Johannes...

On Feb 6, 2013, at 2:31 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 6 Feb 2013, at 07:50, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:54 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: >> >>> On 5 Feb 2013, at 01:32, Bill Wendling wrote: >>> >>>> No. It hasn't been written up. We typically

For some reason this thread seems to be gone in a wrong direction. I'm sorry for that. The discussion on the RFC asked for a reason to keep the script, I think we heard reasons to do so (due to branches). Now, I was unable to determine if the `git llvm` scripts was removed "just as part of the bunch" or if we expect a problem with the script. If it is the former, are there

...ason is whether or not we want to encourage anything >>> as part of them or whether we want "llvm specific" commit >>> advice/instructions/etc where we want people to use these for sure. >>> >>> That said, git isn't the most command line friendly of VCSs for me so if >>> we want to have something that makes things just a little easier I'm down, >>> but would like to see what we expect them to do documented (here?) and ... >>> documented (on the web page). >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> -...