search for: vcirc

...Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2 | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/primes/primes | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2 | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/family/family | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ...

...0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/ocean/ocean 0.042 0.042 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc 0.0005 0.0005 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/compiler/compiler 0.0006 0.0006 0.0 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/fixoutput/fixoutput 0.0006 0.0006 0....

...0.03 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees | 0.0905 15916 0.0494 * 0.0369 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.05 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc | 0.0170 1916 0.0065 * 0.0059 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc | 3.1184 770364 4.3001 * 0.6510...

...0.04 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees | 0.1000 21416 0.0680 * 0.0520 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.07 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc | 0.0280 1920 0.0080 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.01 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc | 4.3802 764024 6.0723 * 0.6120...

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...0.03 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees | 0.0770 21424 0.0500 * 0.0404 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.05 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc | 0.0160 1932 0.0030 * 0.0092 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc | 2.6410 764028 3.8733 * 0.3957...

...0.02 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees | 0.0720 15932 0.0239 * 0.0184 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc | 0.0068 2164 0.0032 * 0.0031 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc | 1.3468 795448 2.0855 * 0.4500...

...| -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees                          | > 0.0500 11288    0.0700      *                0.0500      |    0.00    0.01 >  0.00 *           0.06 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc                          | > 0.0100 1768     0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.01    0.00 >  0.01 *           0.02 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc              | > 1.7300 563480   3.2999      *        ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/ > trees | 0.0500 11288 0.0700 > * 0.0500 | 0.00 0.01 0.00 * > 0.06 | - - n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/ > vcirc | 0.0100 1768 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.01 0.00 0.01 * > 0.02 | - - n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/ > timberwolfmc | 1.7300 563480 3.2999...

...01 0.0001 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2FProlangs-C%2B%2B%2Ftrees%2Ftrees.compile=on> > 3.06% 0.1276 0.1315 0.0003 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2FProlangs-C%2B%2B%2Fvcirc%2Fvcirc.compile=on> > 3.03% 0.0363 0.0374 0.0001 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/ocean/ocean.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_def...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

...ource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/unix-smail MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/exptree SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shooto...

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...57 3 0.01 6196 0 0.01 6633 uudecode.ll 6 23057 0 0.01 23030 0 0.01 23030 uuencode.ll 7 28770 0 0.01 28743 0 0.01 28743 valid.ll 2 13666 0 0.01 13641 0 0.01 13641 vbrquantize.ll 5 67602 0 0.01 67571 0 0.02 67571 VbrTag.ll 8 51601 0 0.01 51570 0 0.01 51570 vcg.ll 18 130799 0 0.02 130776 0 0.02 128377 vcirc.ll 14 15860 0 0.01 15830 0 0.01 15830 vector.ll 7 7822 0 0.01 7799 0 0.01 8727 vehicle.ll 23 44862 0 0.01 44833 0 0.01 44833 verify.ll 0 455 0 0.01 420 0 0.01 420 version.ll 4 4038 0 0.01 4007 0 0.01 4007 VirtThread.ll 5 14767 0 0.01 14735 0 0.01 14735 visual.ll 2 1713 0 0.01 1696 0 0.01 1696 vla.l...