Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "vceq_u8".
Did you mean:
vceq_p8
2010 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Vectors in structures
...9;ll be sending patches to NEON.td for all ambiguities I find...
Wait a minute.... VCEQ does not have a special polynomial version. There is only VCEQ.I8. What I said about support for polynomial types in Clang is still true, but for this particular case, there is no difference between vceq_s8, vceq_u8, and vceq_p8 (aside from the types of the intrinsic arguments).
2010 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] Vectors in structures
On 27 September 2010 23:03, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote:
> Can you clarify ARM's position on those structure types? It sounds like you are advocating that we get rid of them. The only reason we've been using them in llvm-gcc and clang is for compatibility for ARM's specifications and with ARM's RVCT compiler. If ARM does not care about those things,
2010 Sep 28
2
[LLVMdev] Vectors in structures
...implemented in LLVM, there is no other way...
maybe not.
> Wait a minute.... VCEQ does not have a special polynomial version. There is only VCEQ.I8. What I said about support for polynomial types in Clang is still true, but for this particular case, there is no difference between vceq_s8, vceq_u8, and vceq_p8 (aside from the types of the intrinsic arguments).
Sorry, bad example... (and wrong copy&past test generation) ;)
--
cheers,
--renato
http://systemcall.org/
Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at
http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm