search for: vc7.1

I'll wait for the research. We should try, as much as possible, to make it work with just what the compiler provides and without third party packages. Thanks, reid. On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 07:46, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I added the include of cstudio and it fails with plain VC7.1; the file > does not exist. > > Add it for now. If it is impossible to build with VC7.1 and without

Someone needs to adjudicate on whether I add the #include of <cstdio> or not. I can't test this so, Paolo/Henrik/Jeff, please let me know if I need to add it. Thanks, Reid. On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 07:08, Jeff Cohen wrote: > But I compiled that under vc7.1 as it was! > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:19:22 +0200 > Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> wrote: > >

I added the include of cstudio and it fails with plain VC7.1; the file does not exist. Add it for now. If it is impossible to build with VC7.1 and without STLPort, then there really isn't a choice. I have to research the issue myself to see if it's possible to avoid using STLPort. On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:42:51 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Someone needs

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Bill Wendling wrote: > > I just wanted to know if anyone's looked into using the free version of > > Microsoft's Visual C++ toolkit for LLVM: > > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ > > Sorry, but it is not even close to working (its template and STL support > is horribly lacking). The

I checked right now that it compiles also with #include <iostream> Jeff, can you test it with plain VC? --- Paolo Invernizzi On Sep 24, 2004, at 4:52 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > I'll wait for the research. We should try, as much as possible, to make > it work with just what the compiler provides and without third party > packages. > > Thanks, > > reid. > >

On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Sorry, but it is not even close to working (its template and STL support > > is horribly lacking). The Visual Studio "Whidbey" compiler, now in beta, > > will handle it though with only a reasonable amount of tweaking to the > > LLVM sources. I have no idea about when Microsoft intends to release it > > though,

I have just committed a change to Value.h that changes the Value class from using a "struct" declaration to a "class" declaration. I'm not sure why VC7.1 would generate different symbols for class vs. struct. I'm pretty certain that's a violation of the ABI. In any event, we should be consistent. The Value class is declared "class Value" in numerous places

On Sep 23, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > MSVC++ is picky about this. It considers classes and structs to be > different types so you have to be consistent. If you forward declared > a > struct as a class within the same compilation unit, it would complain > about that too. It's not just linking. You are right... BTW, I've just fixed that problem in my checkout

Hi Paolo, > <snip> > for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Dest->begin(); PHINode *PN = > dyn_cast<PHINode>(I); ++I) > visitPHINode(*PN); > <snip> > > build_vc71\lib\Transforms\Scalar\SCCP.cpp(202) : error C2275: > 'llvm::PHINode' : illegal use of this type as an expression > > but I think is a NO-NO, so suggestions? Since it's fussy

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:29:15 -0700 > >It all depends on how well it works with 7.1. Hopefully it won't be >much longer before we know for sure. > When, we have found the compiler that compiles LLVM code, we should use it as the lowest dominator for all future releases as long as possible due to those issues stated in

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:51:08 +0200 Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2004, at 7:29 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > > Just make sure you read the uninstall instructions before installing. > > Microsoft has been known to essentially require the reformatting your > > boot partition in order to uninstall beta versions of VS. And, of >

On Sep 15, 2004, at 8:04 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I cannot find any specific instructions for uninstalling the VC++ 2005 > Express Edition. There is this README file: > http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/visualc/readme/default.aspx. As > it isn't the full Visual Studio it probably isn't messing around with > Windows system files. > > I do know for a fact that the

MSVC++ is picky about this. It considers classes and structs to be different types so you have to be consistent. If you forward declared a struct as a class within the same compilation unit, it would complain about that too. It's not just linking. On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:59:42 +0200 Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> wrote: > Hi all, > > Finally I managed to find

Hi all, Finally I managed to find out a strange problem under Visual C During the link of the HowToUseJIT program, I was always missing some symbols... and I was going crazy testing out different options... At the end, unmangling the differences in what linker was searching and what was present in the libraries, I found that the problem is that we have something like this... Value.h struct

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:18:01 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Again, while I can sympathize, this problem doesn't affect LLVM because > we have no legacy of compiling on Win32. Well, these were reasons why it takes so long for newer versions to catch on. Obviously they don't apply to LLVM. Yet :) > > And don't even think of doing this near the end

On Sep 15, 2004, at 7:29 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Just make sure you read the uninstall instructions before installing. > Microsoft has been known to essentially require the reformatting your > boot partition in order to uninstall beta versions of VS. And, of > course, it is required that you uninstall the beta before installing a > newer beta or the release version. Urrggg! I

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > I can confirm that both are compiled properly: Ok. > for (BasicBlock::iterator I = H->begin; isa<PHINode>(I); I++) { > PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode(I); > .... > } > > I'll make a patch for whatever solution do you prefer (this problem is > a showstopper for more than a dozen files...) I prefer this

Adding an include for std::remove under vc7.1 --- Paolo Invernizzi -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: diff.txt URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040924/e1ca1218/attachment.txt>

Hi, Have you tried the new VC8 Beta? It's been out for less than 2 weeks: http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/visualc/default.aspx It's supposed to have improved standards compliance. Regards, -Eugene Talagrand On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 01:56:03 -0500 (CDT) > From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> > Reply-To: llvmdev at

I can confirm that both are compiled properly: A) PHINode *PN; for (BasicBlock::iterator I = H->begin(); PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I); I++) .... B) for (BasicBlock::iterator I = H->begin; isa<PHINode>(I); I++) { PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode(I); .... } I'll make a patch for whatever solution do you prefer (this problem is a showstopper for more than a dozen