search for: vc7

Hi I try to load an ogg file with the vorbisfile library like this: FILE *f = fopen("test.ogg", "rb"); if(!f) ...; ov_open(f, &vf, 0, 0); But ov_open always throws an exception. Im pretty sure its a compiler problem because the same code worked on VC6. Im compiling my programm with the multithreaded dll option as mentioned on the mailing list bevor. Does anybody know if

Hi all, I''ve just noticed that 0.10 is out and wanted to give it a try on windows. I''m not at all an VS C++ Developer so I might do something very stupid here. My env: Windows Server 2003 VS .NET 2003 On the command line with nmake from VC7 in the path this is what I get: Attempting remote update of ferret Building native extensions. This could take a while... Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility, Version 7.10.3077 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. NMAKE : fatal error U1077: ''cl'':...

Hi Ralph, Two diffs. One for vorbis.def and the other for vorbisfile.def. Hope they work!! regards John -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: vorbisdef.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 256 bytes Desc: vorbisdef.diff Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/attachments/20031001/3b7df5ad/vorbisdef-0001.obj -------------- next part

...with only a reasonable amount of tweaking to the > LLVM sources. I have no idea about when Microsoft intends to release it > though, but I would guess that it will be sometime soon. Google can > probably tell you :) Chris, I think you're wrong. The above link is GUI-less version of VC7.1, and it's template support has being hugely improved since VC7. Looking at regression test summary for C++ Boost: http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/ (the bottom of the page), you can see that this compiler fails mere 3% of tests. The tests are libraries, not standard confo...

...Version: 0.4034 Major: 4 Minor: 10 Build: 67766446 SP: 0 Type: 0 Time: 2004-11-21 08:09:57 TTH: EJEUEI5NYOW2OQOXRJC7OHZ2ZUSLA5JF6IPD6TI c:\documents\vcprojects\dcplusplus\windows\transferview.cpp(195): ? c:\documents\vcprojects\dcplusplus\windows\transferview.h(50): ? c:\program files\vs.net 2003\vc7\atlmfc\include\atlwin.h(3017): ? user32!0x666BABF7: ? user32!0x666BAF39: ? user32!0x666C0D29: ? user32!0x666ED284: ? user32!0x666EE099: ? user32!0x666EE2D5: ? comctl32!0x57758097: ? comctl32!0x5775D2C5: ? comctl32!0x5775DFAE: ? comctl32!0x5775E518: ? comctl32!0x577666D7: ? comctl32!0x577675C7: ? us...

...amount of tweaking to the > > LLVM sources. I have no idea about when Microsoft intends to release it > > though, but I would guess that it will be sometime soon. Google can > > probably tell you :) > > Chris, I think you're wrong. The above link is GUI-less version of VC7.1, and > it's template support has being hugely improved since VC7. I have not tried the above link, but I have tried the official VC7.1 product. It croaked on the first partial specialization of a template it saw in an LLVM header file. :( -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www...

...em (I've read Reid Spencer post about it) > Paolo, thanks for the patches. In the near future I'll try to compile > them. > > I've installed STLport 6.4.2 with vc6. May I suggest you to use a newer version of the compiler? VC6 is not so compliant to the C++ standard as VC7 and above. You can also download for free a version of VC.NET 2005 beta, as I've noted that in LLVM code there's a reference to its runtime library, meaning that someone else has worked with it over LLVM... <gossip> I've read that an MSIL front-end for LLVM is being developed....

I just found this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ I don''t tend to pay much attention to Microsoft and MS Windows, so perhaps everyone else already knew about it. Basically, they have released a command-line-only version of their C++ compiler and libraries for free (gratis) downloading. I assume this version would be able to compile wxRuby, but would be

...ex. Now i have tried to use the new version (1.2beta1), but when I try to compile with the new version of libspeex.lib and new h files, with Visual Studio .NET 2003, I get this error: fatal error LNK1262: link failed due to mismatched versions of 'C:\Programmi\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003\Vc7\bin\c2.dll' and LINK.EXE Could someone help? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20060913/2cad7e99/attachment.html

Hi all! Does anyone successfully use the VC8/VS2005 command line tools (cl.exe and link.exe) with wine yet? I'm trying to setup VC8 in our cross compiling environment (which already works perfectly with VC7), but have some problems here. After some tries, I can now run cl.exe with wine to compile our sources (although some command line parameters cause the program to crash, but that's not crucial). But when I try to start the linker, I get the following error message: LINK : fatal error LNK1101:...

...> > > LLVM sources. I have no idea about when Microsoft intends to release it > > > though, but I would guess that it will be sometime soon. Google can > > > probably tell you :) > > > > Chris, I think you're wrong. The above link is GUI-less version of VC7.1, and > > it's template support has being hugely improved since VC7. > > I have not tried the above link, but I have tried the official VC7.1 > product. It croaked on the first partial specialization of a template it > saw in an LLVM header file. :( > > -Chris > &g...

...28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- >From: Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> >Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] diffs for vc7.1 >Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:13:10 +0200 > >Hi all, > >Attached to this email you can find the diffs versus current CVS that makes >all the touched files compile under Microsoft Visual C 7.1 > >The following libs are now building: >vmcore, transformutils, transform, cwri...

This one includes the latest App.cpp which includes the Mac fix from Nick. I thought it was in 0.0.11, but it wasn''t. It also adds support for "stock objects", like colours, pens, and fonts. This turned out to be quite challenging, but I''m happy with the solution. It only took a few days :-/ Kevin

I just pushed a new wxruby-swig, which includes the known MSWin rakefile changes. It also has some significant internal improvements that will make it easier to add classes, and it includes support for one new class (wxEvent). wxruby-swig is now licensed under the "MIT license". wxRuby will remain under the wxWindows license as long as we are releasing the old code base. When we

Alright, this time a small announce going out to *just* the mongrel list so I can get some early testing. There''s a new pre-release of 0.3.13.4 out that includes the win32 version of the gem. ** WIN32 USERS SHOULD INSTALL THIS AND TEST.*** ***** BUT NOT ON PRODUCTION SYSTEMS. ****** As usual, you install it with: sudo gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/

Last week I was struggling to get xrc built into wxRuby and finally got it to compile. The problem I am now having is that the normal samples are not working at all (have not even tried any xrc stuff yet). So to test if it is a problem with xrc or my build process I tried compiling wxRuby without XRC, this caused the same error to be printed out as the failed XRC build. The output (in both

Hi, Much older versions of Wine didn't seem to uncover this problem, but newer versions (since 12/04 I think) do. What's the most likely cause of this and how should I approach fixing it on my system? My current setup is wine-20050111 from source. After it was built all existing .wine directories were deleted and wine --version was run to set them up. I have not used Winetools yet.

Hi all, Windows 2000 VC++ 6 Well, it turns out I''m not insane. The rb_class_new_instance() chokes with RC9. However, when I rolled back to RC7, it worked fine. So, either something is broken in RC9 or this is some sort of VC6 vs VC7 issue. Can anyone else confirm? Regards, Dan

On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Bill Wendling wrote: > I just wanted to know if anyone's looked into using the free version of > Microsoft's Visual C++ toolkit for LLVM: > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ Sorry, but it is not even close to working (its template and STL support is horribly lacking). The Visual Studio "Whidbey" compiler, now in beta, will

...TL the way STL should be implemented. And the reason to this is the fact that STL isn't a standard, but only make use of the template handling technology that the C++ ISO standard provides. Am I right on this? >Well, the same scons file can also build a VC6 variant side by side with >vc7.1, but I've no access to VC6 here. >When the scons file sill be ready I'll post to you for a try. Looking forward to this... :) Henrik _________________________________________________________________ F� alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.dk/