Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "vc2k5sp1".
Did you mean:
vc2005sp1
2008 Dec 07
0
[LLVMdev] Build errors on trunk for about a week now.
...t it by removing my includes, libs, defines, and
about ten other things, it is needed in every case, spent about 8
hours on all this so I am extremely sure). Attached is the patch;
should I post it to the LLVM list as well?
Oh, and yes, instead of VC2k5 being the minimum requirement, it should
be VC2k5SP1 (although VC2k3 does not have that issue, if someone
managed to get around to fixing the friend errors that VC2k3 is bugged
with).
Actually, I am forwarding this to the list anyway, good record in case
anyone searches.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
N...
2008 Dec 05
4
[LLVMdev] Build errors on trunk for about a week now.
I did some looking up on that const thing. Apparently that const is
'supposed' to be there, but it is not strictly required. However
there is a bug in VS2k3 (VS7) through VS2k8 (VS9) (no clue if it has
been fixed yet) that requires it to be there when the functor is being
called through a const qualified interface, such as through stl
containers. They state that a bug report has been