search for: vbrs

...ied those to further narrow down the changes. Jack, Brendan, or others that may know, would that change be intended for some reason, or am I the only person seeing it? Can anyone else reproduce my findings? I kinda feel like i'm smockin crack here, or mebbe the only person trying to reencode VBRs? *shrug* Any feedback would be welcome :) Thanks and mad props to the icecast crew! Ghetto Nough (err, sumthin) PS - Is another forum more appropriate for this question? I tried searching through the mailing archives but the search is broked :( -----Original Message----- > I've noticed...

...ird-party tools / packages) have a negative view / opinion regarding this change of directory. BTW, let's not forget the existence of the "diag/*" files in Syslinux. Regards, Ady. PS: Let's also not forget the existence of other methods / code to generate / install MBRs and/or VBRs such as: _ "sys.com" / "sys.exe" (v.3.8) from FreeDOS; _ "sys-freedos-linux"; _ "ms-sys" ( _code in C_ ) and its forks such as: _ "ms-sys-free" (current latest code is older than its parent); _ a fork of "ms-sys" by Pete Batard (use...

Reid, I finally figured out why my types were mismatching in my hand-decoded bytecode example when it worked fine in my actual code. It turns out that I was not leaving out the extension bits when I was hand decoding the VBRs. D'oh! Everything matches up now. Also figured out why the bcanalyzer is spitting out all those pointers to opaque. These types are forward references and they are getting printed out before they're resolved. Easy to fix. -- Robert.

Brendan Cully wrote: > > The format of ices.conf changed somewhat in 0.2, to support multiple streams > from the same playlist with different reencoding options. In short, these > settings have been moved into the Stream node. For more info have a look > at the sample ices.conf included with the distribution. I did modify my ices.conf when I made the upgrade. Here's my

Hello, can someone give me a short summary on the status of support for sector sizes >512bytes in SYSLINUX? The installer obviously still doesn't support it, at least it complains about "unsupported sector size" when used on a 4k-sector disk. I read somewhere that this is only a problem of the installer, and that SYSLINUX itself would work if it got installed "by other

...nsane. If someone play with the syslinux's internal compilation process, he is probably aware that it may change completely on every single commit. We just do not support this usage. > PS: Let's also not forget the existence of other methods / code to > generate / install MBRs and/or VBRs such as: > _ "sys.com" / "sys.exe" (v.3.8) from FreeDOS; > _ "sys-freedos-linux"; > _ "ms-sys" ( _code in C_ ) and its forks such as: > _ "ms-sys-free" (current latest code is older than its parent); > _ a fork of "ms-sys&...

Ok i have founded it ! Thanks ! My project is to realize a usb booting key with all distributions of Windows and linux. Mon problem is that i don?t know how to build it and how can i have two diferrently Windows on it.. Do you have alleady done this ? Obtenez Outlook pour iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 1:53 PM +0200, "Gene Cumm" <gene.cumm at

...rg/wiki/index.php/Config#CONFIG Keeping the initial config simple is also suggested as it should minimize any impact it may have on subsequent configurations. Some directives are sticky (not reset when loading a new config). > Which exact version of SYSLINUX / EXTLINUX are you using? Are both VBRs > (sda1 and sda2) using the same exact version? Is your chain.c32 using > the same version too? -- -Gene

Hello, We are experiencing a strange behaviour on an embedded system (i386 PC board). The structure of our disk is the following one : - A 2GB fat16 partition with DOS and syslinux - A 100GB Ext4 partition with Extlinux an several linux images to boot on ram - A swap partition The system boot on syslinux to choose among Dos and Linux boot using chain. When Linux is chosen, syslinux chains to

...7 @@ int btrfs_install_file(const char *path, int devfd, struct stat *rst) * Due to historical reasons (SGI IRIX's design of disk layouts), the first * sector in the primary AG on XFS filesystems contains the superblock, which is * a problem with bootloaders that rely on BIOSes (that load VBRs which are - * (located in the first sector of the partition). + * located in the first sector of the partition). * * Thus, we need to handle this issue, otherwise Syslinux will damage the XFS's * superblock. -- 1.7.10.4

...7 @@ int btrfs_install_file(const char *path, int devfd, struct stat *rst) * Due to historical reasons (SGI IRIX's design of disk layouts), the first * sector in the primary AG on XFS filesystems contains the superblock, which is * a problem with bootloaders that rely on BIOSes (that load VBRs which are - * (located in the first sector of the partition). + * located in the first sector of the partition). * * Thus, we need to handle this issue, otherwise Syslinux will damage the XFS's * superblock. -- 1.7.10.4

...iguous fs blocks Is it still adequate / relevant / valid / current/ needed / desired? Another patch, "xfs: rename xfs_is_valid_magicnum to xfs_is_valid_sb", also sent during 2015Jul, was already committed. 2_ In "mbr/mbr.S" as of v.6.03, there is specific code for XFS' VBRs. Besides the resulting "mbr.bin", are others "bios/mbr/*.bin" binaries capable of a similar / equivalent resulting feature (i.e. using XFS as boot partition for EXTLINUX)? If this feature is currently (v.6.03) available only to "mbr.bin", is there a way to make th...

> On 01/08/2016 05:06 AM, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > > > 2_ In "mbr/mbr.S" as of v.6.03, there is specific code for XFS' VBRs. > > > > Besides the resulting "mbr.bin", are others "bios/mbr/*.bin" binaries > > capable of a similar / equivalent resulting feature (i.e. using XFS as > > boot partition for EXTLINUX)? > > > > If this feature is currently (v.6.03) avail...

...and how can i have two diferrently Windows on it.. > > Do you have alleady done this ? Having multiple copies of Windows will greatly depend on how you want them booting. Full installs generally do best in separate partitions/file systems and you could use chain.c32 to load their respective VBRs (volume boot record; boot sector). Recovery-type environments would live in WIM files and could all co-exist in 1 partition. I have a feeling other projects have done the same (Hiren comes to mind). I'd suggest researching this and perhaps looking at some forums ( http://reboot.pro comes to...

Hello, I've noticed that when I try to reencode VBR mp3s to broadcast @128k , they are not being reencoded at all. They stream as normal VBRs I am unable to reproduce this at lower bitrates (56-112k i've specifically tested and all work fine). It does reencode all non-VBR mp3s appropriately to 128k... Any ideas why VBR reencoding would suddenly stop working at 128k? I've attempted to hunt through the source files of both ices...

...e next release, when I get a couple hours, will either revoke this feature, make it optional, and/or try to detect VBR files and unconditionally reencode those. In the meantime, you might try 0.2.1, which isn't much different but doesn't have the aforementioned "feature". Still, VBRs haven't been much tested and and are not officially supported. So 0.2.1 may still crash on you. Try it out though... fyi jack, I did almost finish the updates to libshout2. I'll get those to you this week :) -b --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project...

- 0.2.2 2001-08-01 - You can now specify the host and port for each mount point separately. In fact, you have to. - MP3 encoding output buffer size increased, seems to handle VBRs better, don't know why this is necessary at the moment. - Thread stack size increased again. - Write to stdout directly for usage/-V info, so it doesn't get swallowed if ices is configured to run in the background. - Include system configuration i...

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Ady SF via Syslinux wrote: > [PATCH] extlinux/main.c: typo fixes > > Some typo fixes in extlinux/main.c. > None of them effects code execution. > --- > extlinux/main.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > FWIW working on a new version that is `git am` ready, it will have a "sign-off".

On 26 September 2012 22:08, Jan Voung <jvoung at chromium.org> wrote: > I think most of the instructions operands are encoded as VBR(N) > for some N number of bits, and it seems to me that VBR(8) is like ULEB? > I think that the default N is 6 bits, but I haven't tried tweaking these > parameters. It has a similar purpose, but slightly different. SLEB (the signed version)

...each time, is there any reason not to use the CONFIG directive? The CONFIG directive can load a new configuration file while changing the Working Directory at the same time. http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Config#CONFIG Which exact version of SYSLINUX / EXTLINUX are you using? Are both VBRs (sda1 and sda2) using the same exact version? Is your chain.c32 using the same version too? Regards, Ady. > > _______________________________________________ > Syslinux mailing list > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com > Unsubscribe or set options at: > http://www.zytor.c...