search for: varoqui

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "varoqui".

2004 Sep 18
2
a little help w/ sys_clone
Hello, can someone direct me to a code sample showing usage of sys_clone on IA64 ? I use that syscall in the multipathd daemon, and I received compilation errors from IA64 pepole. As I don't have hardware to play with, I'd appreciate guidance. regards, -- christophe varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr>
2004 Sep 19
2
klibc compilation breakage on 2.6.8+
...__sighandler_t definition with a __user annotation. __user not being defined previously leads to a compilation breakage. It's the only occurrence for now, so the following dirty work-around works here : add a "#define __user" at klibc/include/signal.h head. regards, -- christophe varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr>
2004 Sep 14
6
initrd / initramfs future
...l static binary * storage drivers must be compiled static ? * udev available ? Putting it this way, it seems the initrd is the right place for stuff like lvm2, multipath, mdadm ... but I'd like to be sure before dropping the provisional klibc support in the tools. Please comment. Regards, cvaroqui
2010 Jun 16
0
OpenSVC clustered service manager available
.... 3/ Jail support. OpenSVC does not care about provisioning, but I hope hope I got the start/stop stuff right. 4/ Opensvc startup script. 5/ The port has been done on FreeBSD 8. Feedback on what breaks on older release is welcome. More information on http://www.opensvc.com/ Cheers, -- Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com> OpenSVC
2008 May 27
1
need advice: runing gpxelinux.0 without tftp
...dhcp-requesting 0.0.0.0 ... and gets all frustrated by the dhcpd response :) Should I persist on this path, or is there a better one ? For example, is it possible to chain-load gpxelinux.0 from sys/iso/extlinux, or even use the gpxe stack directly from there ? Thanks for this new powerful tool, cvaroqui
2004 Jul 19
1
klibc linked tools developpement env
...ould like to receive advice on how to solve this "klibc build environment" issue. Does current or future LSB mandates where klibc could fit into a Linux FS tree, or is kernel tarball integration still the plan ? Have distribution packagers already shown interest in this issue ? regards, cvaroqui --
2004 Jul 27
1
warning killing for poor !LANG=C|US people
--- ../multipath-tools-0.2.8.1/klibc/klibc/arch/i386/MCONFIG 2004-07-20 10:51:42.000000000 +0200 +++ klibc/klibc/arch/i386/MCONFIG 2004-07-27 17:10:12.000000000 +0200 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ # them to be cdecl # REGPARM = -mregparm=3 -DREGPARM -gcc_major := $(shell $(CC) -v 2>&1 | awk '/gcc version/{print int($$3)}') +gcc_major := $(shell unset LANG;$(CC) -v 2>&1 | awk
2008 Jun 24
11
what''s correct way of shrinking LVM based domU?
Hi all I want to shrink one of my LVM based domU''s, but don''t quite know how to do it. I have searched the Wiki & HOWTO''s, and they all show you how expand / enlarge a LVM based domU, but not shrinking it. So, I stopped (destroyed) the domU, and then resized it as follows: lvresize /dev/data/cpanel1 -L10GB (It was 100GB), but when I a started it up again, I
2004 Jan 26
0
[ANNOUCE] kpartx-0.0.2
...e map : loop0p2 Deleted device map : loop0p5 Deleted device map : loop0p6 loop deleted : /dev/loop0 I heard there was some work to make the loop kernel driver partitionable ... Is it still worth it ? Is there interest in this tool, or ideas ? If there is, how to keep the ball rolling ? regards, cvaroqui