Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "varlink".
Did you mean:
zarlink
1998 Mar 12
1
Re: message rejected: Re: Re: Towards a solution of tmp-file problems.
...contains
named temp files, and no other processes can see it, then you have
behaviour which is equivalent to mine (suggestion, that is, I don''t pretend
it''s a solution until there''s been some kind of formal logical proof).
> Setting a $TMPDIR is one way, making /tmp a varlink is another?
I''d have to defer to Theo De Raadt on the answer to that question. He has
more experience. I think setting TMPDIR would work fine, except that the
processes which are using that directory are still subject to the same
filesystem races which haunt us again and again. In other w...
1998 Mar 11
4
Re: Towards a solution of tmp-file problems
...i.nl) wrote:
> > How about allowing symlinks with "variable expansion"?
> What you describe is a new kind of object. Don''t call it a symlink
> - POSIX will soon tell us precisely what the semantics of symlinks
> are (does the standard exist already?). Call it a varlink. New type
> of object in the filesystem, new semantics.
Good idea! Done.
Andries, I''m deliberately interpreting your suggestion a little
different than you intended. You probably meant that a new set of
"flags" (file, directory, symlink, pipe, block-dev, char-dev,
... varli...
1998 Mar 09
2
Towards a solution of tmp-file problems.
Introduction.
------------
Every now and then a new "exploit" turns up of some program that uses
tmp files. The first solution was "sticky bits", but since links exist
(that''s a LONG time), that solution is inadequate.
Discussion.
----------
The problem is that you put an object (link/pipe) in the place where
you expect a program to put its tempfile, and wait for