Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "varbits".
Did you mean:
varbit
2013 Jan 31
2
[LLVMdev] Tablegen problem populating TSFlags
...}
def ADD : MyInstruction<(outs RC1:$dst), (ins RC1:$r0, RC1:$r1), "add
$r0,$r1", [(set RC1:$dst, (add RC1:$r0, RC1:$r1))]>;
======================================
Based on some initial debug it seems like it's getting confused with
an extra level of indirection resolving the VarBits records for the
foo variable. I thought I would ask the experts before digging
further.
The command line I used with the above testcase is
llvm-tblgen.exe -gen-instr-info -I C:\LLVM\llvm\lib\Target -I
C:\LLVM\llvm\include test.td -o foo.tmp
Joe
2015 Sep 03
2
Fuzzing complex programs
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
> Did you build the Postgres code with -fsanitize-coverage=... ?
Yes:
CC = clang
CFLAGS = -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels
-Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing
-fwrapv -Wno-unused-command-line-argument -g -O0 -fsanitize=address
2015 Sep 03
2
Fuzzing complex programs
Looks correct.
Can you post the output of libFuzzer here?
Something like
#0 READ cov: 0 bits: 0 units: 97701 exec/s: 0
#1 pulse cov: 732 bits: 0 units: 97701 exec/s: 0
#2 pulse cov: 737 bits: 0 units: 97701 exec/s: 1
#4 pulse cov: 858 bits: 0 units: 97701 exec/s: 2
#8 pulse cov: 880 bits: 0 units: 97701 exec/s: 4
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Greg Stark