search for: vania

Hi Vania, If I understood correctly, you have an executable, which is JITing code that has dependencies on the symbols of entire executable. In case dlsym cannot find this symbol, try to link your executable with -rdynamic (gcc) or --export-dynamic (ld): -rdynamic Pass the flag -export-d...

...8u0/</a><br> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=710493&jmp=cit&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE,ACM">http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=710493&jmp=cit&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE,ACM</a><br> <br> Vania<br> <div class="moz-signature">-- <br> <meta content="text/html;" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> <font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">================================================ <br> Vania...

On 03/13/2013 11:01 AM, Dmitry Mikushin wrote: > Hi Vania, > > If I understood correctly, you have an executable, which is JITing > code that has dependencies on the symbols of entire executable. In > case dlsym cannot find this symbol, try to link your executable with > -rdynamic (gcc) or --export-dynamic (ld): > > -rdynami...

...;> <div class="gmail_quote"> <div>Which architectures are you interested in particularly?<br> <br> </div> </div> <pre wrap="">ARM, MIPS, PowerPC and SH </pre> </blockquote> <br> Thanks again, <br> Vania<br> <br> <div class="moz-signature">-- <br> <meta content="text/html;" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> <font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">================================================ <br...

...ts --info=progress2 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: vania.toperich at gmail.com QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org Hi, For some reason, rsync reports wrong total file size of transfer.... It reports 3.13G and stops on 50% when all the files are transferred correctly....: sending incremental file list 0 0% 0.00kB/s 0:00:00...

...the in-memory IR and dynamicall call the LLVM code<br> generator on a chunk of code that has been decompiled, not a complete program.<br> <i> </i>Is this possible ? Is it worthwile in terms of performance ?<br> <br> <br> Sincerely,<br> -- Vania<br> <div class="moz-signature"><br> <meta content="text/html;" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> <font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">================================================ <br> Vania JOL...

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Vania Joloboff <vania.joloboff at inria.fr> wrote: > We do dynamic binary translation. We are in a similar situation to qemu > except we are SystemC / TLM compliant for hardware and bus models. Our > current technology is somewhat like qemu, we translate the binary into > "semantic...

...still want to try dlsym() first and only when it fails then take control. We do not see this in the execution engine interface. Of course we want to do the resolution only once upon the first call not for each call to foo_bar() like a profiling listener would do. Comments will be appreciated... Vania -- -- Vania Joloboff

Vania Joloboff wrote: > Hello, > > We are a research project in joint french-chinese laboratory. We are > considering using > LLVM in our project but we'd like to have some additional info before > we dive in. > Since we are new kids on the block, please bear with us... > &...

Hello It looks like Ubuntu 13.04 has changed the include files directories structure Now we get the following error in many of our programs that compile fine on Ubuntu 12.04 > clang++ -c -x c++ -emit-llvm > ../../libsimsoc/processors/ppc/ppc_llvm_lib.cpp -DNDEBUG > -I/home/vania/systemc-2.3.0/include -I/home/vania/tlm2.0/include/tlm > -DSC_INCLUDE_DYNAMIC_PROCESSES -I/usr/local/llvm/3.2/include -DNDEBUG > -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS > -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I../.. -I.. > -DABS_TOP_SRCDIR="\"/home/vania/simsoc/tru...

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 12 March 2013 15:28, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > >> Can't we just paste in a RNG so that we'll get the same output on all >> systems (and can still use the reference output)? >> > > We can, though other tests suffer from the same issue. Would be good

...Summary: --info=progress2 increase % Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: vania.toperich at gmail.com QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org --info=progress2 will not show increase of percentage done in real time as current throughput will. Percentage get's updated only after file has been transferred to destination. If you have 4 files you will get only 4 updates (ju...

...vm_shutdown); EngineBuilder builder(module); We have problems because TargetData does not seem to exist anymore. Where is the documentation describing the changes regarding TargetData and what we should do now ? I did not see anything in 3.0 Release Notes in that regard Thanks for your help Vania

> Where are these passes documented ? >From http://llvm.org/docs/ http://llvm.org/docs/Passes.html: LLVM's Analysis and Transform Passes - A list of optimizations and analyses implemented in LLVM. BTW: your e-mail client is weird. It doesn't denote which parts are quoted by "> " at the left side. Also you sent HTML e-mail, which you shouldn't normally do

I'm not sure if this will do everything that you want, but it controls at least some of these expansions at the Clang level: tools/clang/lib/Basic/Targets.cpp On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Dan <westdac at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm working on getting the LLVM/projects/Test-Suite/UnitTest to compile > for a target that I am developing. > > There is an example:

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Vania Joloboff <vania at liama.ia.ac.cn> wrote: Hello, > > We are a research project in joint french-chinese laboratory. We are > considering using > LLVM in our project but we'd like to have some additional info before we > dive in. > Since we are new kids on the block, pl...

I'm working on getting the LLVM/projects/Test-Suite/UnitTest to compile for a target that I am developing. There is an example: AtomicOps, that uses calls to: __sync_fetch_and_add __sync_val_compare_and_swap __sync_lock_test_and_set These get converted into llvm IR operations like: atomicrmw cmpxchg Is there any way to keep these as function calls, as they are easier to map to the

We're thinking about running our own buildbot against the upstream llvm and clang sources. I'm talking to our build folks and seeing what they can allow. Maybe we can contribute some build slaves to the osuosl buildbot but I'm not sure. If we do end up having to run our own buildbot, what's the best way to integrate that into the upstream web page and status notifier? Basically,

...ntel x86, using LLVM as intermediate language. We have a post-doc position opened on this topic for about one year. The job is located at Tsinghua in Beijing, but under conditions from France INRIA. Candidates may apply directly on INRIA web site at and/or contact me for additional information. Vania Joloboff INRIA

This was replaced by having a #<num> referenced by the object. Kind of like how metadata is referenced. -bw On Feb 3, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: >> To use an attribute group, an object references the attribute group's ID: >> >> attribute_group_ref := attrgroup(<attrgroup_id>) > > Is this unused now? I don't see