search for: vanes002

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 74 matches for "vanes002".

2004 Sep 08
2
--keep-dirlinks in combination with --one-file-system
...deleted. So the documentation for --keep-dirlinks should warn that also using -x (--one-file-system) has a side effect where symlinked directories followed by --keep-dirlinks that reside on another file system will not be processed for deletions. -- John Van Essen Univ of MN Alumnus <vanes002@umn.edu>
2003 Dec 01
3
rsync'd destination much larger than source
Hello. Recently, I started using rsync to backup files in my root partition on an Ensim box over to a remote machine. The remote machine 'pulls' from the Ensim box using the following: rsync -arvzx --exclude=/proc --exclude=/tmp --exclude=/mnt --delete --delete-excluded -e ssh 192.168.0.1:/ /bkup/rootpart/ The problem is, if I 'df' the Ensim box, it reports that the entire
2003 Apr 27
4
Bogus rsync "Success" message when out of disk space
...orrect error message): write failed on jvejunk2 : No space left on device rsync error: error in file IO (code 11) at receiver.c(243) rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (200 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165) -- John Van Essen <vanes002@umn.edu> On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 12:37:09, Green, Paul <Paul.Green@stratus.com> wrote: >John Van Essen [mailto:vanes002@umn.edu] wrote, in partial: >> In receiver.c there are three places with code similar to: >> >> if (fd != -1 && write_file(fd,data,i) != i)...
2005 Jan 21
5
Potential new option: --delete-during
There is a new patch named "delete-during.diff" in the CVS "patches" dir. This patch adds the ability for rsync to incrementally delete files in each directory during the normal course of the transfer rather than doing a separate delete scan either before or after the transfer. The patch renames the current --delete option into --delete-before and makes --delete behave in the
2003 Jan 07
1
Bug or feature? --delete-after + symlinks
Hi, sorry if this is old stuff, but I did my best to look first... Have been getting errors along these lines: mv mydir mdir.2002 ln -s mydir.2002 mydir Then update mirror with rsync -av --delete-after. Without --delete-after, no problem, with --delete-after, get a code 23. The attached shell script will recreate the error (on my machine, at any rate). Just run it from a clean directory.
2003 Apr 08
2
[Patch] Require extra --stats to emit heap statistics
...m is for your data\&. +algorithm is for your data\&. An additional --stats will also +print statistics on heap memory allocation (if available)\&. .IP .IP "\fB--partial\fP" By default, rsync will delete any partially -- John Van Essen Univ of MN Alumnus <vanes002@umn.edu>
2004 Sep 24
4
rsync 2.6.2 crash
OK, I will do that next. I just tried 2.6.1 on both ends, and it died in a similar fashion. -------Original Message------- > From: Wayne Davison <wayned@samba.org> > Subject: Re: rsync 2.6.2 crash > Sent: 24 Sep 2004 11:21:51 > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 11:09:26AM -0700, jim wrote: > > The server crashed, but left rsync.exe.stackdump: >
2006 Jun 06
13
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3825] New: rsync won't delete directory with excluded files
...39;t delete directory with excluded files Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: vanes002@umn.edu QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org A full rsync was initially done. Later, some --exclude rules for temporary and scratch files were added to the backup script. If a directory contains a file that is now being excluded and the source directory is deleted, the target directory will b...
2005 Nov 22
7
[Bug 3186] Surprisingly large unshared memory usage
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 ------- Comment #1 from foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu 2005-11-22 14:16 MST ------- Any ideas on this? It's been open 5 weeks and probably got overlooked... Tnx! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are
2002 Nov 07
0
Bogus rsync "Success" message when out of disk space
...heap statistics:\n", Could you prepend a newline to the beginning of this so it does not blend in with the last line of any transfer-related output? rprintf(FINFO, RSYNC_NAME "\n[%d] (%s%s%s) heap statistics:\n", Thanks. -- John Van Essen Univ of MN Alumnus <vanes002@umn.edu> 3DGamers Systems Software Support <jve@3dgamers.com>
2003 Aug 06
1
issue with rsync 2.5.6
Hello, I bumped in to issue with rsync 2.5.6 while doing "sync" of large files. Here is the error message.... "write failed on cm3.0_hpux11.11_final.tar : Error 0 rsync error: error in file IO (code 11) at receiver.c(243) rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (13342 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165)" There is lot
2003 Oct 08
1
use rsync with filenames containing "-"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey there, when i try to sync two directories or files containing a "-" character in ther path, rsync fails: # /usr/bin/rsync --partial -rcvaLe "ssh -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -o \ StrictHostKeyChecking=no" --progress "user@server:/path/band - album/" "/path/" this gives an error like: rsync: on remote
2003 Nov 11
1
Next release of rsync - when?
...". Are there any particular reasons for holding back the next release? Will the next release be 2.6.0 because of the protocol number bump? I'd sure like to see the full list of changes since 2.5.6 and begin testing a release candidate. -- John Van Essen Univ of MN Alumnus <vanes002@umn.edu>
2003 Dec 05
1
[PATCH] seg fault fix
This is a patch made by the redhat folks. I noticed it in their src.rpm for rsync while I was updating it for 2.5.7. I figure at the worst, it's a nice bit of protection. It would be cool to get this put into CVS. -- Kees Cook kees@kernel.org -------------- next part -------------- --- rsync-2.4.6/main.c.foo Fri Aug 17 11:46:03 2001 +++ rsync-2.4.6/main.c Fri Aug 17 11:45:37 2001 @@
2004 Jan 08
0
Implementing rsync hard-link improvements
...> feel free to let me know if you start on something. Can I feel free to let you know you can do it all? And I will go back to being a lurker. P.S. It's been a steady stream of email from you two guys all day! Don't you ever sleep?? -- John Van Essen Univ of MN Alumnus <vanes002@umn.edu>
2004 Jan 19
1
File that "vanish"es between readdir and stat is not IO error
...s read but had vanished by the time the stat() was done to get the file details. In make_file(), when readlink_stat() fails, if error is NOENT then perhaps do the same that that send_files() now does and report as vanished and set IOERR_VANISHED? -- John Van Essen Univ of MN Alumnus <vanes002@umn.edu>
2004 Jan 21
3
2.6.0 in cygwin problem
Hello! I need to do rsync between local drives on win32. Rsync works, but it never ends. I started it with -vv and it writes something like: total: matches=0 tag_hits=0 false_alarms=0 data=0 And then it stays forever. :-( Could you help me?
2004 Apr 03
0
--hard-link option now uses the first existing file - Excellent!
...t that should allow shared data memory to remain intact (avoiding Copy on Write) after the client forks the generator, thus using less memory in systems that support CoW. I think this (perhaps reworded :D) is worth noting in the INTERNAL section. -- John Van Essen Univ of MN Alumnus <vanes002@umn.edu>
2004 Aug 28
0
[Bug 1673] New: Verbose dry run doesn't report replacements of symlink with directory
...ymlink with directory Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: vanes002@umn.edu QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org After an rsync, if a directory on the target is replaced by a symlink pointing to a new location containing the original, unchanged, directory content, a verbose dry-run will *not* report that the directory contents from the source will be transferre...
2004 Sep 10
1
not always making hard links?
I'm using 2.6.3pre1 to transfer a rather large Debian archive (126GB, more than 30 million files). It contains about 450 daily snapshots, where unchanged files are hardlinked between the snapshots (so many files have hunderds of links). It's been running for some time now, and I found that while it's far from done, it's already used 165GB on the receiving end. Investigation shows