search for: vanboxem

2011/1/5 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>: > Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes: > >> Yeah that's the two different ones I mean. Everything MS (intrinsics, >> language features etc...) is purely version-bound, so I don't even get >> why CMake insists on checking every known function prototype of for >> example &q...

I first sent this to the Clang dev list, but they told me to come here: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> Date: 2010/12/31 Subject: LLVM on Windows MSVC 10 To: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu Hi, I'm trying to build svn LLVM with Visual Studio 2010: cd build cmake .. -G"NMake Makefiles" nmake and several link steps fail due to a missing symbol: > LLVMX86CodeGen.lib(...

Whoops, phone rang and I forgot to cc to the list before I typed the message. ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > To: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> > Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 3:38:21 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and >autofoo builds > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com&gt...

I don't normally build using nmake.. but I just tried and it worked 100% here. Are you sure you are using the trunk? On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>wrote: > I first sent this to the Clang dev list, but they told me to come here: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> > Date: 2010/12/31 > Subject: LLVM on Windows MSVC 10 > To: cfe-d...

2010/12/31 Francois Pichet <pichet2000 at gmail.com>: > I don't normally build using nmake.. but I just tried and it worked 100% > here. > Are you sure you are using the trunk? > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I first sent this to the Clang dev list, but they told me to come here: >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> >> Date: 2010/12/31 >> Subje...

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote: > You're welcome! Please remember that MinGW-w64 does not mean it is 64-bit. > It provides both 32- and 64-bit headers/libs. The "w64" in the name was > originally because that was the project's principal goal, among extending > the API co...

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote: > When building LLVM/Clang, I get the following build failure: > > MinGW-w64 provides the necessary typedefs and declarations. I adjusted the > ifdef's to include a check for a the MinGW-w64-specific symbol of choice to > differentiate mingw.org vs m...

2011/10/6 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Ruben Van Boxem > <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote: > > You're welcome! Please remember that MinGW-w64 does not mean it is > 64-bit. > > It provides both 32- and 64-bit headers/libs. The "w64" in the name was > > originally because that was the project's principal goal, among exten...

2011/1/5 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>: > Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes: > >> And this is why I don't understand configure checks for windows... There's >> only one/two header/library sets... The Windows SDK and MinGW. This info >> should be built in IMHO... > > Although the panorama is not so diverse as...

Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes: >>> I'm trying to build svn LLVM with Visual Studio 2010: >>> >>> cd build >>> cmake .. -G"NMake Makefiles" >>> nmake >>> >>> and several link steps fail due to a missing symbol: >>&gt...

Hi, Can the tools in LLVM create a Win32 exe or dll file? Or does LLVM still rely on Binutils and GCC for that? Is it possible/feasable/wanted that the LLVM toolchain could do this? Thanks, Ruben

Ruben, 2011/1/30 Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>: > Can the tools in LLVM create a Win32 exe or dll file? Or does LLVM > still rely on Binutils and GCC for that? Is it > possible/feasable/wanted that the LLVM toolchain could do this? As you know, we need our linker! Please look into the slide in http://llvm.org/d...

2011/10/6 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Ruben Van Boxem > <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote: > > When building LLVM/Clang, I get the following build failure: > > > > MinGW-w64 provides the necessary typedefs and declarations. I adjusted > the > > ifdef's to include a check for a the MinGW-w64-specific symbol of choice > to &gt...

2013/5/30 Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> > 2013/5/25 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> > >> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Ruben Van Boxem >> <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I submitted this patch a long while ago, together w...

Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes: > And this is why I don't understand configure checks for windows... There's > only one/two header/library sets... The Windows SDK and MinGW. This info > should be built in IMHO... Although the panorama is not so diverse as the Unix world, there is...

Op 5 jan. 2011 19:33 schreef "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info> het volgende: > > > contains most of them. If they're non-trivial (like the ones I needed to > > add for OSX functionality) that's a different story. > FWIW the difference is even more significant on, e.g. mingw32 because > process spawning is pretty much expensive and

Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes: > Yeah that's the two different ones I mean. Everything MS (intrinsics, > language features etc...) is purely version-bound, so I don't even get > why CMake insists on checking every known function prototype of for > example "recv" and f...

...I emailed him what I have. I assume he's been working on it--he recently submitted a patch to fix the permissions on .pdata/.xdata sections that I got wrong :). I've CC'd him as well so we can see what he has for us. Chip > > On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to inquire as to possibility of this being implemented in Clang/LLVM. As this type of exception handling is much closer to the classic Dwarf model currently used, I hope it won't be too difficult to implement this in Clang? Remember that Win64 EH...

When building LLVM/Clang, I get the following build failure: [ 4%] Building CXX object lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Signals.cpp.obj In file included from M:\Development\Source\LLVM\lib\Support\Signals.cpp:33: M:\Development\Source\LLVM\lib\Support/Windows/Signals.inc:48:17: error: redefinition of '_IMAGEHLP_LINE64' typedef struct _IMAGEHLP_LINE64 { ^

Op 1 sep. 2011 14:12 schreef "NAKAMURA Takumi" <geek4civic at gmail.com> het volgende: > > Guys, welcome to the too weird i18n world! > We, Japanese, has got suffered for multibyte charset for 20 years. > > I have added a comment in http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10348 . > Of course I know, I don't think it would be a practical resolution. > > FYI,