Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "valval".
Did you mean:
varval
2010 Jul 07
1
[PATCH] hivex: add hivex_set_value api call and ocaml/perl bindings, tests
...alue)));
+ if (values == NULL)
+ goto leave_prev_values;
+
+ int alloc_ct = 0;
+ int idx_of_val = -1;
+ for (hive_value_h *prev_val = prev_values; *prev_val != 0; ++prev_val) {
+ size_t len;
+ hive_type t;
+
+ hive_set_value *value = &values[prev_val - prev_values];
+
+ char *valval = hivex_value_value (h, *prev_val, &t, &len);
+ if (valval == NULL) goto leave_partial;
+
+ ++alloc_ct;
+ value->value = valval;
+ value->t = t;
+ value->len = len;
+
+ char *valkey = hivex_value_key (h, *prev_val);
+ if (valkey == NULL) goto leave_partial;
+
+...
2010 Jul 03
1
[PATCH] hivex: add hivex_set_value api call
...alue)));
+ if (values == NULL)
+ goto leave_prev_values;
+
+ int alloc_ct = 0;
+ int idx_of_val = -1;
+ for (hive_value_h *prev_val = prev_values; *prev_val != 0; ++prev_val) {
+ size_t len;
+ hive_type t;
+
+ hive_set_value *value = &values[prev_val - prev_values];
+
+ char *valval = hivex_value_value (h, *prev_val, &t, &len);
+ if (valval == NULL) goto leave_partial;
+
+ ++alloc_ct;
+ value->value = valval;
+ value->t = t;
+ value->len = len;
+
+ char *valkey = hivex_value_key (h, *prev_val);
+ if (valkey == NULL) goto leave_partial;
+
+...
2010 Jul 03
1
[PATCH] hivex: add hivex_set_value api call and perl bindings, tests
...alue)));
+ if (values == NULL)
+ goto leave_prev_values;
+
+ int alloc_ct = 0;
+ int idx_of_val = -1;
+ for (hive_value_h *prev_val = prev_values; *prev_val != 0; ++prev_val) {
+ size_t len;
+ hive_type t;
+
+ hive_set_value *value = &values[prev_val - prev_values];
+
+ char *valval = hivex_value_value (h, *prev_val, &t, &len);
+ if (valval == NULL) goto leave_partial;
+
+ ++alloc_ct;
+ value->value = valval;
+ value->t = t;
+ value->len = len;
+
+ char *valkey = hivex_value_key (h, *prev_val);
+ if (valkey == NULL) goto leave_partial;
+
+...
2013 Jul 25
19
[PATCH hivex 00/19] Fix read/write handling of li-records.
This is, hopefully, a full fix for handling of li-records.
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717583
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987463
Rich.