search for: valuemask

...t/CommandLine.cpp >> +++ b/lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp >> @@ -294,10 +294,7 @@ static inline bool ProvideOption(Option *Handler, >> StringRef ArgName, >>     break; >> >>   default: >> -    errs() << ProgramName >> -         << ": Bad ValueMask flag! CommandLine usage error:" >> -         << Handler->getValueExpectedFlag() << "\n"; >> -    llvm_unreachable(0); >> +    llvm_unreachable("Bad ValueMask flag!"); > > This patch would lose the expected flag value, which is unfortun...

...+ b/lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp >>> @@ -294,10 +294,7 @@ static inline bool ProvideOption(Option *Handler, >>> StringRef ArgName, >>> break; >>> >>> default: >>> - errs() << ProgramName >>> - << ": Bad ValueMask flag! CommandLine usage error:" >>> - << Handler->getValueExpectedFlag() << "\n"; >>> - llvm_unreachable(0); >>> + llvm_unreachable("Bad ValueMask flag!"); >> >> This patch would lose the expected flag val...

...'d be happy to fix as I find them, things like: --- a/lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp +++ b/lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp @@ -294,10 +294,7 @@ static inline bool ProvideOption(Option *Handler, StringRef ArgName, break; default: - errs() << ProgramName - << ": Bad ValueMask flag! CommandLine usage error:" - << Handler->getValueExpectedFlag() << "\n"; - llvm_unreachable(0); + llvm_unreachable("Bad ValueMask flag!"); } and --- a/lib/Support/APInt.cpp +++ b/lib/Support/APInt.cpp @@ -1440,16 +1440,14 @@ APInt API...

...I->getValue())+ - "' is out of range for type '" + - getEnumName(getTypeNum(0)) + "'!"); + if (Val != II->getValue()) { + // If sign-extended doesn't fit, does it fit as unsigned? + unsigned ValueMask = unsigned(MVT::getIntVTBitMask(VT)); + unsigned UnsignedVal = unsigned(II->getValue()); + + if ((ValueMask & UnsignedVal) != UnsignedVal) { + TP.error("Integer value '" + itostr(II->getValue())+ + "' is out of range for type '" + + getEn...

...ke: > > --- a/lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp > +++ b/lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp > @@ -294,10 +294,7 @@ static inline bool ProvideOption(Option *Handler, > StringRef ArgName, > break; > > default: > - errs() << ProgramName > - << ": Bad ValueMask flag! CommandLine usage error:" > - << Handler->getValueExpectedFlag() << "\n"; > - llvm_unreachable(0); > + llvm_unreachable("Bad ValueMask flag!"); This patch would lose the expected flag value, which is unfortunate. > +++ b/lib/...

...E_BELL (1 << 2) +#define ACTION_VALUE_EDGE (1 << 3) +#define ACTION_VALUE_EDGEBUTTON (1 << 4) +#define ACTION_VALUES_ALL \ + ( ACTION_VALUE_KEY \ + | ACTION_VALUE_BUTTON \ + | ACTION_VALUE_BELL \ + | ACTION_VALUE_EDGE \ + | ACTION_VALUE_EDGEBUTTON ) + +static int actionValueMasks[] = { + ACTION_VALUE_KEY, + ACTION_VALUE_BUTTON, + ACTION_VALUE_BELL, + ACTION_VALUE_EDGE, + ACTION_VALUE_EDGEBUTTON +}; - a->button.button = 0; - a->button.modifiers = 0; +enum { + ACTION_TYPE_KEY = 0, + ACTION_TYPE_BUTTON, + ACTION_TYPE_BELL, + ACTION_TYP...

...valid, but I might have missed something: I don't know much about X11 programming. (The call is ::Window xwindow = XCreateWindow( xdisplay, RootWindow(xdisplay, DefaultScreen(xdisplay)), 0, 0, 256, 256, 0, xvisualinfo->depth, InputOutput, xvisualinfo->visual, valuemask, &attrib ); but without context that's probably not worth much to others.) Are there any experienced X11 programmers out there who can suggest what to do next? Duncan Murdoch

..."' is out of range for type '" + > - getEnumName(getTypeNum(0)) + "'!"); > + if (Val != II->getValue()) { > + // If sign-extended doesn't fit, does it fit as unsigned? > + unsigned ValueMask = unsigned(MVT::getIntVTBitMask(VT)); > + unsigned UnsignedVal = unsigned(II->getValue()); > + > + if ((ValueMask & UnsignedVal) != UnsignedVal) { > + TP.error("Integer value '" + itostr(II->getValue())+ > + "' is out of range for type...

..."' is out of range for type '" + > - getEnumName(getTypeNum(0)) + "'!"); > + if (Val != II->getValue()) { > + // If sign-extended doesn't fit, does it fit as unsigned? > + unsigned ValueMask = unsigned(MVT::getIntVTBitMask(VT)); > + unsigned UnsignedVal = unsigned(II->getValue()); > + > + if ((ValueMask & UnsignedVal) != UnsignedVal) { > + TP.error("Integer value '" + itostr(II->getValue())+ > + "' is out of range for type...

On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:26 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang > with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less > interesting). One warning I've recently hit a few instances of is > -Wweak-vtable which is, in fact, an explicitly documented LLVM coding > standard (

For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less interesting). One warning I've recently hit a few instances of is -Wweak-vtable which is, in fact, an explicitly documented LLVM coding standard ( http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#ll_virtual_anch ). Some instances of this have been easy to

...t/CommandLine.cpp >> +++ b/lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp >> @@ -294,10 +294,7 @@ static inline bool ProvideOption(Option *Handler, >> StringRef ArgName, >>     break; >> >>   default: >> -    errs() << ProgramName >> -         << ": Bad ValueMask flag! CommandLine usage error:" >> -         << Handler->getValueExpectedFlag() << "\n"; >> -    llvm_unreachable(0); >> +    llvm_unreachable("Bad ValueMask flag!"); > > This patch would lose the expected flag value, which is unfortun...

Hello, I have my work on the nv vpe video decoder in a functional state. In case you didn't know this decoder accelerates mpeg2 video at the idct/mc level. I have verified that it works on nv40 hardware. I believe it works on nv30 hardware (and maybe some earlier hardware), but I cannot verify since I have none. I will reply with patches against the kernel, drm, ddx and mesa for