Displaying 20 results from an estimated 28 matches for "valousek".
2018 Mar 13
1
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
> Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache,
> but enabling that did not make much effect).
>
> To me, this is no surprise ? nothing can match nfs performance for small
> files for obvious reasons:
>
C...
2018 Mar 14
2
Expected performance for WORM scenario
We can't stick to single server because the law. Redundancy is a legal
requirement for our business.
I'm sort of giving up on gluster though. It would seem a pretty stupid
content addressable storage would suit our needs better.
On 13 March 2018 at 10:12, Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com>
wrote:
> Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache,
> but enabling that did not make much effect).
>
> To me, this is no surprise ? nothing can match nfs performance for small
> files for obvious reasons:
>
>...
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
...Glusterfs does not support async writes
Summary: If you do not need to scale out, stick with a single server (+DRBD optionally for HA), it will give you the best performance
Ondrej
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 9:10 AM
To: Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com>
Cc: Andreas Ericsson <andreas.ericsson at findity.com>; Gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com<mailto:Ondr...
2018 Mar 13
3
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
> Well, it might be close to the _*synchronous*_ nfs, but it is still well
> behind of the asynchronous nfs performance.
>
> Simple script (bit extreme I know, but helps to draw the picture):
>
>
>
> #!/bin/csh
>
>
>
&...
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
...= 7000)
echo ahoj > test.$HOSTNAME.$j
@ j++
end
rm -rf test.$HOSTNAME.*
Takes 9 seconds to execute on the NFS share, but 90 seconds on GlusterFS ? i.e. 10 times slower.
Ondrej
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 8:28 AM
To: Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com>
Cc: Andreas Ericsson <andreas.ericsson at findity.com>; Gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com<mailto:Ondr...
2010 Apr 01
3
RPID on called party
...me of A gets displayed on the B's phone fine, but this is
not what I want.
This works with Cisco Call manager fine - the RPID is sent as a part of
the response to the SIP INVITE this way:
SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.60.20:5060;branch=z9hG4bK42892c32;rport
From: "Ondrej Valousek" <sip:7775 at 192.168.60.20> <sip:7775 at 192.168.60.20> ;tag=as4786d518
To: <sip:1098 at 192.168.62.12> <sip:1098 at 192.168.62.12> ;tag=f75ff5d8-1023-4240-bc4b-d7eeb6d0d77d-42063104
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:53:15 GMT
Call-ID: 465a9c200587260d164f4514094896fb at 192.1...
2018 Mar 13
5
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gluster will never perform well for small files.
>
> I believe there is nothing you can do with this.
>
It is bad compared to a disk filesystem but I believe it is much closer to
NFS now.
Andreas,
Looking at your wo...
2018 Mar 07
1
gluster for home directories?
Hi,
On 2018-03-07 16:35, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> Why do you need to replace your existing solution?
> If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async
> NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS
The current solution is 8 years old and is reaching its end of life.
The reason we are also looking into g...
2005 Aug 10
6
USB handset wanted
Hello all asterisk users!
Question: Does anybody know about any good USB handset that would
understand SIP and Asterisk and will run with Linux?
I have found tons of them, but they are mainly only supported in Windows
environment.
I would like to set up new phone system in our company that would be
based on asterisk acting as PBX and SIP.
If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Any
2006 Nov 13
8
Desktop integration
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000066">
<font size="+1">Hi all,<br>
<br>
I am interested in
2018 Mar 14
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
...sk though, and
especially when running on a single node instead of in a cluster. Has
anyone else set this up and managed to get better write performance?
On 13 March 2018 at 08:28, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
> Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Gluster will never perform well for small files.
>>
>> I believe there is nothing you can do with this.
>>
>
> It is bad compared to a disk filesystem but I believe it is much closer to...
2007 Sep 19
18
sip.conf best practices?
All - I've been wrestling with how to best structure the sip device
accounts on a new asterisk server I'm deploying. All of the sip
devices (currently only Linksys SPA941s) will reside on the same
subnet as the server, and I have already set up a decent automatic
provisioning system for the phones. When the rollout is complete,
there will be about 100 SIP devices authenticating and
2006 Nov 13
3
FW: Desktop integration
...ists.digium.com</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com">mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>] <b><span
style="font-weight: bold;">On Behalf Of </span></b>Ondrej Valousek<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Monday, 13
November 2006
6:29 AM<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> <st1:PersonName
w:st="on">Asterisk Users Mailing List...
2012 Jun 01
2
ssh & control groups
Hi List,
I am looking for an option for sshd to start user's shell (when logging in interactively to a remote host) in a control group via cgexec -
so for example:
/bin/cgexec -g <username> /bin/bash
This would be extremely handy on linux Terminal servers to control users access to the system resources (protect system from a malicious
user hogging the machine by running cpu/memory
2010 Jul 01
3
Remote Party ID issue
...ERROR[3954]: pbx.c:2902 ast_func_write: Function CONNECTEDLINE not registered
Same happens trying function CALLEDID.
I am using Asterisk 1.6.1.20.
What do i have to do to use this function or alternatively the function CALLEDID() described in bug 8824?
Thanks in advance for help.
Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Did anyone manage to force asterisk to put Remote-party-ID attribute on
> the SIP outgoing call? I.e. When A calls B, I want that A gets a name of > B displayed on his phone.
> Note that name of A gets displayed on the B's phone fine, but this is
> no...
2018 Mar 19
0
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
On 3/19/2018 10:52 AM, Rik Theys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote:
>> On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
>> Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my
>> own setup either.? For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage
>> in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying
>> to facilitate read / writes to t...
2018 Mar 12
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Hi,
Gluster will never perform well for small files.
I believe there is nothing you can do with this.
Ondrej
From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Ericsson
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 1:47 PM
To: Gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario
Heya fellas.
I've been
2011 Feb 07
1
remote bridging
Hi List,
Quick question:
I am using asterisk 1.8.1 - how do I detect whether a native (remote) bridge is being used between 2 SIP peers?
It is not obvious to me from the console logs.
Thanks,
Ondrej
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110207/cf55a5dd/attachment.htm>
2018 Mar 07
0
gluster for home directories?
Hi,
Why do you need to replace your existing solution?
If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS
Ondrej
-----
The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential and is designated solely for the attention of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you must not use,
2018 Mar 19
0
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my
own setup either. For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage
in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying
to facilitate read / writes to the other bricks.
Writes to the g...