Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "validx".
Did you mean:
valid
2011 Oct 10
3
[LLVMdev] Disable Short-Circuit Evaluation?
Is there any way to disable short-circuit evaluation of expressions in
Clang/LLVM?
Let's say I have C code like the following:
bool validX = get_group_id(0) > 32;
int globalIndexY0 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 0 + 1;
bool valid0 = validX && globalIndexY0 >= 4 && globalIndexY0 < 3910;
int globalIndexY1 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 1 + 1;
bool valid1 = validX &&...
2011 Oct 10
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Disable Short-Circuit Evaluation?
Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> writes:
> int globalIndexY2 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 2 + 1;
> bool valid2 = validX && globalIndexY2 >= 4 && globalIndexY2 < 3910;
>
> Clang, even at -O0, is performing short-circuit evaluation of these
> expressions, resulting in a fair number of branch instructions being
> generated.
It has to. This is the semantics of C. Short-circuiting is...
2011 Oct 10
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Disable Short-Circuit Evaluation?
10.10.2011, 18:29, "David A. Greene" <greened at obbligato.org>:
> Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> int globalIndexY2 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 2 + 1;
>> bool valid2 = validX && globalIndexY2 >= 4 && globalIndexY2 < 3910;
>>
>> Clang, even at -O0, is performing short-circuit evaluation of these
>> expressions, resulting in a fair number of branch instructions being
>> generated.
>
> It has to. This is the semantics...
2008 Apr 08
2
Problem with NA data when computing standard error
Hey,
I want to compute means and standard errors as two tables like this:
se<-function(x)sqrt(var(x)/length(x))
object1<-as.data.frame.table(tapply(Data[Year=="1999"],na.rm=T,list(Group[Year=="1999"],Season[Year=="1999"]),mean))