Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "validfor".
Did you mean:
validator
2012 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] Minimum Array Size
Hal Finkel wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:40:43 -0700
> Nick Lewycky<nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote:
>
>> Hal Finkel wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> clang currently seems to generate the same code for both:
>>>
>>> double something_a(char A[const static 256]) {
>>> ...
>>> }
>>>
>>> and for:
2012 Sep 11
2
[LLVMdev] Minimum Array Size
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:40:43 -0700
Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote:
> Hal Finkel wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > clang currently seems to generate the same code for both:
> >
> > double something_a(char A[const static 256]) {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > and for:
> >
> > double something_b(char (*const A)) {
> > ...