Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "valid_reg".
Did you mean:
valid_ref
2012 Mar 10
6
[Bug 47182] New: GeFroce 6150SE nForce 430: misaligned reg 0x0060081D
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47182
Bug #: 47182
Summary: GeFroce 6150SE nForce 430: misaligned reg 0x0060081D
Classification: Unclassified
Product: xorg
Version: 7.6 (2010.12)
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
2009 Sep 18
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix WITHIN macro off by one
...ios.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c
index 6afd82e..539835a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ valid_reg(struct nvbios *bios, uint32_t reg)
if (dev_priv->card_type >= NV_50)
return 1;
- #define WITHIN(x, y, z) ((x >= y) && (x <= y + z))
+ #define WITHIN(x, y, z) ((x >= y) && (x < y + z))
if (WITHIN(reg, NV_PMC_OFFSET, NV_PMC_SIZE))
return 1;
if (WITHIN(r...