search for: valid_package_version

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "valid_package_version".

2009 Mar 03
1
execution time of .packages
...if (is.null(lib.loc)) lib.loc <- .libPaths() if (all.available) { ans <- character(0L) lib.loc <- lib.loc[file.exists(lib.loc)] valid_package_version_regexp <- .standard_regexps()$valid_package_version for (lib in lib.loc) { a <- list.files(lib, all.files = FALSE, full.names = FALSE)...
2011 Feb 19
1
Accessing Package NEWS (NEWS.Rd)
...t;) exiting from: tools:::.build_news_db_from_package_NEWS_Rd(newsfile) Error: invalid version specification CHANGES IN VERSION 1.0.0CHANGES IN VERSION 1.0.1CHANGES IN VERSION 2.0.0 Well, so it didn't like my version numbers. But is the regexp check correct? Browse[2]> .standard_regexps()$valid_package_version [1] "([[:digit:]]+[.-]){1,}[[:digit:]]+" Would appear as though packages with only major.minor comparisons would pass. Or did I miss something... ---- P.S. Another thing I didn't see specified was whether this was an acceptable format in current Rd format: \section{CHANGES IN VERS...