search for: vaguness

Hi Eli, What do you mean by "kind of vague" ? So does not guarantee to generate correct instructions ? I just tried what you said but getting following error ? Any ideas ? What I did is clang hello.c -S -target mips-unknown-linux Error: In file included from hello.c:1In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:28/usr/include/features.h:323:10 fatak error 'bits/predefs.h' file not

> What do you mean by "kind of vague" ? So does not guarantee to generate correct instructions ? >Your question is vague.  Generally, you get better answers if you ask better questions. Sorry, I didn't mean to be rude. My question is does that mean institution generated may not guarantee what the "instructions" mean to be ? >This sounds like you are using headers

I have just some vague and thus probably wrong ideas about when to use model() in controllers, and by now I err on being redundant. I don''t post them here to avoid leaving anything that may be false in the archives. Can anyone explain exactly in which cases one should use model()? -- fxn

On Jan 11, 2012, at 3:15 AM, 陳韋任 wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:37:50AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Yuri, >> >>> I am new to the landingpad (which is relatively new too). >>> Documentation http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_landingpad leaves some >>> questions open: >>> >>> 1. What happens when actual exception type

> This isn't an llvm-specific feature, but how exceptions work in general. Ugh, Q2 and Q3 are also not llvm-specific feature? Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667 Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj

On 12 Nov 2012, at 17:22, janarbek wrote: > What do you mean by "kind of vague" ? So does not guarantee to generate correct instructions ? Your question is vague. Generally, you get better answers if you ask better questions. > I just tried what you said but getting following error ? Any ideas ? > What I did is clang hello.c -S -target mips-unknown-linux > > Error:

While digging through the code I remember having seen something like an (yet undocumented) "update_query" for SQL (and I guess something similar for the LDAP faction as well)?! Can that be used to augment the "doveadm pw" function to actually /set/ the password for a given user instead of just "calculating" the hash, so that an operator can copy&waste it into the

Ah yes. There they are right on page 4 of "Writing R Extensions". The "LazyLoad: yes" was sufficient to avoid the check errors, but I'll add the "Depends: methods" as well. For the manual-impaired like me, it _may_ be worth reiterating these two requirements in section 1.6.6 "Name spaces with formal classes and methods" - right where the .onLoad

Xenlinux uses a special architecture-dependent bit in the page table, called PG_arch_1 to indicate that a page is "foreign" (PG_foreign). It also apparently uses it to determine if a page is pinned (PG_pinned). Linux/ia64 (and apparently Linux/ppc and Linux/ppc64) use the PG_arch_1 bit for other purposes. On Linux/ia64, it is used to determine if the instruction cache needs to be

>>>>> Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> >>>>> on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes: > On 4 November 2016 at 16:24, Martin Maechler wrote: | My > proposed name '--no-stop-on-error' was a quick shot; if | > somebody has a more concise or better "English style" > wording | (which is somewhat compatible with

Hi, Sorry for the vagueness. I'm starting to think about an experimental programming language based, among other things, on microthreads, or green threads, as Erlang has. I'm still under a very vague stage, just thinking on it, so I was wondering on the way this could be achieved. What I know from microthreads are things like: * They don't have their own stack * Switching between

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:37:50AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Yuri, > > > I am new to the landingpad (which is relatively new too). > > Documentation http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_landingpad leaves some > > questions open: > > > > 1. What happens when actual exception type isn't listed in catch or > > filter clauses? Does it still return

Hi. I am very interested in the security properties a totally open TPM can give our users? - its use as a universal smartcard to protect all types of keys. When adding the virtual 1.2 or 2.0 TPM I get the vague error below. OS is Debian stable with standard packages. Error starting domain: Unable to find 'swtpm' binary in $PATH: No such file or directory Traceback (most recent call

Dear R-users, is there a way to pass a list of patterns to the grep function? I vaguely remember something with %in% operator... Thanks, St?phane. -- "La science a certes quelques magnifiques r?ussites ? son actif mais ? tout prendre, je pr?f?re de loin ?tre heureux plut?t qu'avoir raison." D. Adams -- AGC website <http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/agc> St?phane

Sorry, forgot to add group to CC. On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > Cameron, > > To make it less vague, I would ideally like to traverse top down. I > believe what you suggested is what I want, I will have a look at it. > > Currently, I am iterating over the BBs in a Function, so > Function::iterator BBitr=F->begin(),

LLVMers, Is there any way to guarantee iteration of the basic blocks from top down or path to path? Currently it looks sort of semi-random, sometimes visiting loop heads first and other times loop tails, is there a way I can visit the BBs top down or path to path? Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Timo, This might be a bit vague, but I have noticed that rc19 seems to have broken the read/unread/reply flags in imap. My officemate has had problems with messages that are read and marked as read then mysteriously get remarked as unread the next time email is checked. I've had problems where I reply to a message and it does not get marked as "answered". We didn't see this

I have a machine where several of my installed applications are getting way behind. It is not a mission critical server, but I need it to be stable (I have all fairly old well supported hardware, nothing special). Since updating and rebuilding all the ports is pretty much mandatory for the upgrade to 7.x and I plan to take that path soon, would most people consider 7.1RC2 stable enough for a

I''ve found vague mentions of various attempts at creating an ActiveRecord adapter for the KirbyBase pure Ruby DBMS, but nothing which looks like it''s actually working. Anyone know of such an adapter that is functional and available? b

On 01/18/2015 03:23 PM, Sebastian Herbszt wrote: > > --- tftp-hpa-5.2/tftpd/tftpd.c.orig 2015-01-16 21:45:30.790798281 +0100 > +++ tftp-hpa-5.2/tftpd/tftpd.c 2015-01-18 23:44:28.031177383 +0100 > @@ -1504,6 +1504,8 @@ static int validate_access(char *filenam > return ENOSPACE; > case EEXIST: > return EEXISTS; > + case EACCES: >