search for: vaguer

...;t need to know about that since it wouldn't have been correct for the user to make any assumptions about what ends up in the original section vs overflow in the first place. I think both cases are illustrative of a use case where the precise > output section does not matter, but there is a vaguer goal of placing > a subset of the input sections in a subset of the output sections. > From what I can tell there isn't a way for the code generator to tell > the difference between code that is placed in different output > sections and it is not correct or beneficial to optimize an...

I saw a reort on R-help (without answer) about not being able to load old workspaces (.RData files) in 1.9.0alpha. I have seen the same problem with some of my workspace, although most of them loads without problems. (rw1090alpha as of 17.03, windows XP). Why will some workspaces not load? Kjetil Halvorsen

This is to both the rsync and cygwin lists, and I regret that it is vaguer than I would like, but ... With cygwin 1.7 (latest beta) and the rsync released with it (3.0.6-1) I try to sync a couple of Gb of Thunderbird mail files. The flag settings were -avzuP plus a --chmod and some includes/excludes to control which files to move. I would repeatably get "hangs&quot...

...il the output section size limit is reached, then a different output section is used. I admit that this may be more of a problem for linkers that have a different linker script model. I think both cases are illustrative of a use case where the precise output section does not matter, but there is a vaguer goal of placing a subset of the input sections in a subset of the output sections. >From what I can tell there isn't a way for the code generator to tell the difference between code that is placed in different output sections and it is not correct or beneficial to optimize and code that is p...

...9;'s confusing me is that when marking someone as Friend, you will have to reference the "user_id" of both User A and User B with a foreign key, but I don''t know how to sort that out. Sorry if this question is vague but my understanding of accomplishing this in rails is even vaguer. However, most of the examples I see involve defining relationships between two different models such as Products, LineItems, and Orders or something like that. Sam

...of LLVM-target-maintainers, and/or an active community of end-users. I'd think the immediate practical concern is that there is an active community of LLVM-target-maintainers, so that the maintenance burden does not fall unduly on the rest of the LLVM community. Beyond that is the broader and vaguer question of whether there is anybody *else* who would benefit from the in-tree target, other than the maintainers. You could think of the former as a "cost" (to the LLVM community) question, and the latter as a "benefit" (beyond the community) question. Or even more succinctly:...

On 26 August 2016 at 17:45, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > “Major corporation” does not mean size to me, I read it as “having a major involvement in the project”. Still, you're rejecting new developers because they haven't contributed much before. But if their back-end is upstream, than they'll contribute code upstream for their changes on their back-end.

RFC: (Thin)LTO with Linker Scripts At the last US LLVM Developers' Meeting, we presented [1] a proposal for linker script support in (Thin)LTO. In this RFC, I would like to describe the proposal in more detail and invite the community's feedback, so we can build consensus on the upstream implementation. The end goal of this effort is to extend the benefits of (Thin)LTO, including