search for: vads

Hello, I'm try to run speex on some ARM processor. I'd like to cut away some speex features including VBR, ABR and preprocessor while still supporting VAD/DTX. But I've found some puzzles in the source code regarding VAD as below, 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. Will VAD still work If I don't use the source file preprocess.c? 2)The speex manual

Hi Marc, Thanks for your quick response. So if VAD is enabled then VBR will be enable although it's a special VBR. How about take out the VAD code from the VBR and remove the code else? Lianghu On 10/24/06, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > > 1) there are VAD related codes in the source file preprocess.c. > > Will VAD still work If I

Hi All, I am using R 2.11.0 on a Ubuntu machine. I have a time series data set and want to run rolling regressions with it. Any suggestions would be useful. Here are the details: (1) I convert relevant variables into time series objects and compute first differences: vad <- ts(data$ALLGVA/data$GDPDEF, start=1948, frequency=1) emp <- ts(data$ALLEMP, start=1948, frequency=1) vad.dif1 <-

Hello all: I am interested in using Speex for an application that streams audio from a (noisy) source, so I am interested in VAD and DTX operation. However, after browsing the archives of this list, I note that a number of people have not been satisfied with the operation of the VAD algorithm in Speex. This leads me to a few questions: - Is there a reference somewhere (other than the source

There are many ways to implement a VAD. What you described is actually perfectly equivalent to the most trivial (and least robust) VAD algorithm. Jean-Marc Andy Ross wrote: > Ton Grandgent wrote: >> Andy Ross wrotte: >>> I wrote a trivial squelch feature* in 10 minutes that works >>> basically 100% of the time. >> Could you please explain how this differs from

My data is speech sampled as pcm mono 32khz. I want to use vad for regulating the agc gain mechanism. So... if voice is not detected I just reduce the agc value in order to not amplify the 'silence' otherwise we just increase the agc value if it is below the minimum. Thanks, Daniel ----- Original Message ----- De: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> Para: danflu at

Per my conversation below with digium, are there any legal alternatives to digium's G729? It is out of date, and doesn't support VAD nor silence detection. Digium has stated that they have no plans to update it anytime soon. VAD/Silence is a big deal with major carriers and we are having to fight a battle to get them to make special arrangements to turn off VAD/Silence in their

As I understand it, there are two separate ways to get VAD information from Speex: 1) Using the encoder. 2) Using speex_preprocess(). I present the following observations from an application developer's perspective. They may be wrong, in which case I would appreciate corrections. - The two VAD systems are implemented differently. - speex_preprocess()'s VAD provides more accurate

Hi all, supposing to have speex working at 3.95, when VAD/CNG is employed, which is the size of those "silence" samples respect to voice samples? I am wondering if it could be possible to lower even the transmission of VAD/CNG samples by specifying "outbound" in the communication channel only 1 bit instead of sending the whole VAD/CNG packet. I am doing the same for AMR

Hello Jean-Marc et al: On 07/06/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > - Is there a reference somewhere (other than the source itself) that > > explains how the latest VAD algorithm works? > > Read the source, Luke :-) (sorry) Okay. I had to ask :-) > > > - Is it possible to obtain the VAD status of a Speex stream > >

Hi, Is there is some form of VAD on * for SIP channels, cause I have a problem with MOH. I made an extension which simply plays MOH, when I dial that extension with my ATA188 MOH sounds choppy if I talk on the phone the MOH keeps playing. I saw the sip channel (show channel SIP/*) and I see no packets going in/out when I talk then packets shows going in/out. I don?t have this kind of problem

Hi List, i've set up a cisco 7912 for my asterisk box. I've had problems with VAD and CNG. After googling a bit, i've found an article about asterisk not supporting these two protocols, therefore it's better to turn them off. Since then i did not found answer to my two questions, maybe somebody here could help me: a) am i even able to turn off vad/cng on cisco 7912? SIP

Hi, I decide to write to the list because of a strange behaviour when updating from version 1.1.12 to 1.2rc1. My software was running fine with version 1.1.12, but now I want to benefit from advances on AEC. After updating the library to 1.2rc1 and do few changes on my sources, I run the application and discovered that VAD doesn't work so fine as in previous version 1.1.12 (3 years ago). I

Hi, I have been looking at the speex library and I like it a lot. Good job! I have a couple of questions regarding the preprocessor: 1) I looked at the source code. Even though I am an experienced programmer it looks like Chinese to me ;-) What would I have to do to modify / tweak the audio processing code for my needs? Are there documents describing the algorithms applied for AGC, NS and VAD or

Hello, in my project im using speex 1.2rc1 and the preprocessor VAD seems to only separate complete silence from not complete silence frames. The Speex Manual, you can read "The voice activity detector (VAD) provided by the preprocessor is more advanced than the one directly provided in the codec." but if you go to the source code in preprocess.c line 995 "/* FIXME: This VAD

I'm running a: for band in n w u do for quality in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 do for complexity in 3 do for vad in "" "--vad" do for dtx in "" "--dtx" do echo speexenc -${band} --quality ${quality} --comp ${complexity} ${vad} ${dtx} input.${band}.wav

Jesus, Unfortunately, FFT and magic algorithms don't work (yet?). You might want to try this if you're not satisfied with Speex VAD: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2008-August/006860.html It won't perform any miracles, but I think it works pretty well and is easy to tweak. Tom >---- Original Message ---- >From: jmorion at toomeeting.com >To: speex-dev at

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7226.0"> <TITLE>Speex VAD algorithm</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <!-- Converted from text/rtf

Hi, I found this message concerning VAD and was wondering whether VAD has been ported to fixed-point in the latest version? Thanks, SingHui ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@usherbrooke.ca> Date: Jul 22, 2005 1:02 AM Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Fixed-point To: gue baja <gue_baja@yahoo.com> Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Hi Baja, Here's a quick

Hi Cecile, it seems it is a tabu theme, or nobody uses VAD on speex. I've tried with external EasyVAD solution but the result was not as spected. Other users of the list suggest an algorithm to filter voice based on the power of the signal, but of course, it is not a voice activity detection. I am waiting also a solution for this, while so I use version 1.1.12. Regards. Cecile Dumotier