Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "vadim_nuclight".
2006 Mar 15
2
swap at beginning of slice - danger?
...that swap size was less than
size of b: partition on a slice - it was ok, as boot sectors are
located at beginning of slice. But now, sizes match exactly. What
changed and is it dangerous nowadays to have swap partition at offset 0 ?
--
Best regards,
Vadim Goncharov ICQ UIN 166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru
2010 Sep 01
2
HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Everyone,
On November 30th, FreeBSD 6.4 and FreeBSD 8.0 will have reached their
End of Life and will no longer be supported by the FreeBSD Security Team.
Since FreeBSD 6.4 is the last remaining supported release from the FreeBSD
6.x stable branch, support for the FreeBSD 6.x stable branch will also
cease at the same point. Users of either of
2010 Sep 01
2
HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Everyone,
On November 30th, FreeBSD 6.4 and FreeBSD 8.0 will have reached their
End of Life and will no longer be supported by the FreeBSD Security Team.
Since FreeBSD 6.4 is the last remaining supported release from the FreeBSD
6.x stable branch, support for the FreeBSD 6.x stable branch will also
cease at the same point. Users of either of
2006 Mar 15
1
panic with ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS on 5.4 (and probably 6.0)
...y-pr.cgi?pr=kern/75780
I still have coredumps on my machine together with copy of
kernel.debug (although I've updated machine to 5.5-PRERELEASE alredy),
and can provide backtrace etc. if somebody will be interested in this.
--
Best regards,
Vadim Goncharov ICQ UIN 166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru
2008 Jul 29
3
ipfw "bug" - recv any = not recv any
I hesitate to call this a "bug" as I don't know all the history behind
the ipfw2 decisions, so let me toss this out there and see I'm just
missing something.
Overview
========
The negated operator, "not recv any" was taken to mean "any packet never
received by an interface" believed to be equivalent to "any packet that
originated on the current
2010 Aug 27
1
tcpdump -z
...root@blaa ~/temp/tcpdump-4.1.1$ id
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
$ cat test.sh:
#!/bin/bash
/bin/bash
Is this known and accepted? Could this option maybe be implemented
differently?
Regards,
tazo
=== 8< ================ >8 ===
--
WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru
[Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]