search for: vacuous

...quot;ilist.h": the 2nd "public:" section of "template<typename NodeTy, typename Traits=ilist_traits<NodeTy> > class iplist : public Traits" ===== template <class Compare> void sort_without_temporary_list(Compare comp) { // The list is empty, vacuously sorted. if (empty()) return; // The list has a single element, vacuously sorted. if (std::next(begin()) == end()) return; iterator last_sorted{begin()}; iterator just_after_last_sorted{std::next(last_sorted)}; while (end() != just_after_last...

...t work with Konqueror, which is too bad, as it''s easy to apply the same workaround as for Safari. Please have a look at and apply the patch at http://dev.rubyonrails.com/ticket/1641 Michael -- Michael Schuerig Airtight arguments have mailto:michael@schuerig.de vacuous conclusions. http://www.schuerig.de/michael/ --A.O. Rorty, Explaining Emotions

...al sides of IPO. > We have a very all-or-nothing approach instead. So maybe this distinction > isn't interesting. But hopefully it explains how I'm thinking of it. And > because frontends can often directly specify *some* attributes that we know > a-priori, it doesn't seem a vacuous distinction to me in theory. > > Does that explain things any better? Yes, I think I see what you are going for (what I thought was (2)/(3) is really just (3) in your scheme). Practically, I don't think it is useful to differentiate between (1) and (2). To get (2)-like behavior, the fr...

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: >> Part of the challenge here is to specify the attribute in a way that >> allows inlining, but not IPA without inlining. In fact, maybe it is >> best to not call it "interposable" at all? > > > Yea, this is something *very* different from interposable. GCC and other >

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> The verifier rejects phi nodes of {} type. Do you actually have a case >> where you want this to happen? > > That sounds like a serious bug then: {} should be a first class value > just like {i32}. But in any case, it doesn't really make sense; wouldn't any value of type {} fold to

...ful in conjunction with Rails http://www.schuerig.de/michael/javascript/ Please have a look... at the code. There''s nothing visual about the scripts, I happily leave that to Thomas. Michael -- Michael Schuerig Airtight arguments have mailto:michael@schuerig.de vacuous conclusions. http://www.schuerig.de/michael/ --A.O. Rorty, Explaining Emotions

Full_Name: stephen eglen Version: 1.0.0 OS: Unix (OSF/1) Submission from: (NULL) (129.215.238.26) Hi, in the documentation `Writing R Extensions', the section 3.6.1 (handling the effects of garbage collection) has the following typo: Protecting a SEXP pointer protexts ... Should that be `protects'? -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

gives an error in R. In both S+3 and S+5, it "works" by returning NULL or logical(0), respectively. As a consequence, all(x == y) returns TRUE in Splus, when x <- y <- NULL but gives an error in R. Do we have a good reason *not* to return logical(0) ? Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/ Seminar fuer Statistik, ETH-Zentrum LEO

On May 19, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> On May 19, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Nick Lewycky wrote: >> >>> Chris Lattner wrote: >>>> FYI, I wrote up some thoughts on this here: >>>> http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/MemoryUseMarkers.txt >>>> >>>> The intention is to allow front-ends to express things

...Ewh). Other non-R-related stories in the past month included an analysis of Chatroulette (http://bit.ly/a4mkEL), the legality of statistical sampling (http://bit.ly/9mDfN9), teaching conditional probability (http://bit.ly/dusi61), and (on a lighter note) fonts and ink use (http://bit.ly/MSlPi) and vacuous infographics (http://bit.ly/aGhqhW). The R Community Calendar has also been updated at: http://blog.revolutionanalytics.com/calendar.html If you're looking for more articles about R, you can find summaries from previous months at http://blog.revolutionanalytics.com/roundups/. Join the REvolut...

Hi all, Came across this curious behavior in: R version 2.5.0 Patched (2007-06-05 r41831) A simplified example is: > all(c(NA, NA, NA) > NA, na.rm = TRUE) [1] TRUE Is this expected by definition? If one reduces this to individual comparisons, such as : > NA > NA [1] NA > all(NA > NA) [1] NA > all(NA > NA, na.rm = TRUE) [1] TRUE the initial comparison on the 3

...rver or something. Right now I have too many open construction sites, but in a few weeks I''d happily supply a patch (unless Thomas opposes the idea or has done it himself by then). Michael -- Michael Schuerig Airtight arguments have mailto:michael@schuerig.de vacuous conclusions. http://www.schuerig.de/michael/ --A.O. Rorty, Explaining Emotions

...thematically, all(x<0) is TRUE if x is length 0 (as are all(x==0), and >> all(x>0)), but the likelihood of this being a thought-bug on the author's >> part is exceedingly high, imho. > > > I suspect there may be more R users than you think that understand and use > vacuously true in code. I don't really like the idea of turning a perfectly > good and properly documented mathematical test into an error in order to > protect against a possible "thought-bug". > > Paul > > > So the desirable behavior seems to depend >> >> on...

Hello everyone, It seems that the answer to my question should be obvious, but I''ve not yet found a way to do what I want. Any advice on the best method would be greatly appreciated. Have the following database table: CREATE TABLE datasets ( id int not null auto increment, name varchar not null, value varchar not null, year varchar not null, state

...gs get murky. > > Mathematically, all(x<0) is TRUE if x is length 0 (as are all(x==0), and > all(x>0)), but the likelihood of this being a thought-bug on the author's > part is exceedingly high, imho. I suspect there may be more R users than you think that understand and use vacuously true in code. I don't really like the idea of turning a perfectly good and properly documented mathematical test into an error in order to protect against a possible "thought-bug". Paul So the desirable behavior seems to depend > on the angle we look at it from. > > My...

...inconvenience and real loss of productive effort because of mindless adhesion to bromide based cures that are blandly offered for ills that mostly exist in the imagination of the ignorant then yes; I require evidence of their efficacy. And lining up a bunch of band-wagon pundits chanting the same vacuous refrains is not evidence. And this one is going to the list. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte...

I have 2 questions on ANOVA with 1 between subjects factor and 2 within factors. 1. I am confused on how to do the analysis with aov because I have seen two examples on the web with different solutions. a) Jon Baron (http://www.psych.upenn.edu/~baron/rpsych/rpsych.html) does 6.8.5 Example 5: Stevens pp. 468 - 474 (one between, two within) between: gp within: drug, dose aov(effect ~ gp * drug *

> On Apr 22, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > I feel like this thread got a bit stalled. I'd like to pick it up and try to suggest a path forward. > > I don't hear any real objections to the overall idea of having an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtimes and support libraries. I think we should get that created. I think it

Thanks for writing this up. I think it's a really important point which deserves discussion. Ultimately, I think it is a question as to whether to prioritize the easy switchover for existing out of tree forks, or to prioritize having the best conversion we can make. I feel very strongly that the latter should be the priority for the official repository conversion, and that, therefore, we

Currently, pages generated by Rails tend to be sprinkled with JavaScript. This happens, because the various helper methods work only locally and simply append to the output. In order to hide the JavaScript away, rendering would probably have to be changed. A way I can think of is that a page-specific script is included in the head of the document and JavaScript code is not written to the