search for: v7l

...el is superseded and I think no longer produced.) The problem seems to be caused by grep processor /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 model name : ARMv6-compatible processor rev 7 (v6l) (On Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 there is no error because the model name lines are model name : ARMv7 Processor rev 5 (v7l) model name : ARMv7 Processor rev 4 (v7l) )

Like so many others, I'm having NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE issues. I've tried all the fixes I could find to no avail. My environment: Cent 7 (Linux 4.19.72-v7l.1.el7) with Samba 4.9.1, bound to AD via Realmd. SSSD for ACL's, winbind for user map. Installed packages: nano, ntpdate, ntp, realmd, sssd, sssd-tools, sssd-winbind-idmap, samba-winbind, adcli, oddjob, oddjob-mkhomedir, policycoreutils-python, samba, samba-client samba-common, samba-common-t...

...LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/2003-01-04-ArgumentBug.ll LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/pr13727.ll LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/test-common-symbols.ll LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/test-fp-no-external-funcs.ll LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/test-fp.ll I configure with: --build=armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf --host=armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf --target=armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=neon --with-float=hard --enable-optimized $ cat /proc/cpuinfo Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l) processor : 0 BogoMIPS : 1992.29 processor : 1 BogoMIPS : 199...

Hi Erik, > GHC does not generate or use thumb instructions From you assembly dump, looks like the instructions are 2 bytes long, meaning it's Thumb code not ARM. - Denis. > Owen Shepherd wrote: > >> Pay closer attention to the instruction descriptions on the page you linked >> above: >> >> LDR{*type*}{*cond*}*Rt*, [*Rn* {, #*offset*}] ; immediate

Hi list, I want to use LLVM to compile the C code to arm. Host: Mac OS X 10.10 Target: Pandaboard, armv7l, ubuntu I found some useful information but not worked yet. I tried like this: $ clang -fomit-frame-pointer -ggdb -emit-llvm --target=armv7l-unknown-linux-eabi -mcpu=cortex-a9 —mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp --sysroot=/... test.c -c -o test.bc --> clang-3.5: error: no such file or direc...

...elpful and educational. I think that I understand the perspectives of both Tim and Renato. Let me briefly summarize them to ensure that I correctly understand: Renato’s perspective is that the triple means whatever the author says it does, and that may or not be meaningful. :) In the case of armv7l (for example) it has a clear meaning: ARMv7A little endian. Unfortunately, this nomenclature collides with what is used for sub-architectures. ARMv7l, however, is NOT a sub-architecture, and should not be treated as one. Tim’s perspective is that what Renato says isn’t wrong, but that while the...

The following failures are consistent on buildbot (and my local box). The Clang one I think it's assuming an Intel box, the other two look like the FileCheck are not good enough. http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9/builds/4305 Clang :: CodeGen/compound-assign-overflow.c LLVM :: Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/post-inc-icmpzero.ll LLVM ::

Hi Linfeng, On 06/06/17 04:09 PM, Jonathan Lennox wrote: > Two comments on the various infrastructure for RTCD etc. > > 1. The 0002- patch changes the ABI of the celt_pitch_xcorr functions, > but doesn’t change the assembly in celt/arm/celt_pitch_xcorr_arm.s > correspondingly. I suspect the ‘arch’ parameter can just be ignored > by the assembly functions, but at least the

Hi, Eric > Two ways: > > a) Add support for armv7l to llvm :) > b) Pass --host=<arm arch you want>-… when you configure. Do you mean both way have to be done, or either way? I don't understand if I ignore option a, which means LLVM does NOT support armv7l right now, how can --host=<arm arch you want> work? Or I misunderstood w...

On Aug 8, 2011, at 6:27 PM, 陳韋任 wrote: > Hi, Eric > >> Two ways: >> >> a) Add support for armv7l to llvm :) >> b) Pass --host=<arm arch you want>-… when you configure. > > Do you mean both way have to be done, or either way? I don't > understand if I ignore option a, which means LLVM does NOT > support armv7l right now, how can --host=<arm arch you want> &gt...

...` is a very standard way of obtaining the host's triple. James On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 at 08:34 Tim Northover via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 4 January 2016 at 14:42, Artyom Skrobov via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Ah, I see: ARMv7L is now an alias for ARMv7A. > > The "armv7l" comes directly from the Linux kernel I believe: "armv7" + > "little-endian" (arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:638 ish). I'm not entirely > convinced the "l" belongs in any triple seen by LLVM, but if we do &...

I saw in the anouncement for the upcoming Boston, MA conference that there will be demos of CentOS on an ARM7 system. I am wondering: does this mean that there is somewhere out there a build of some version of CentOS that might run on a Raspberry Pi (which has an ARM7 processor)? -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services

Thank Jonathan and Jean-Marc! I attached the new patch sets in inner_prod_5patches_v3.zip. The Chromebook I'm using is Chromebook 13 CB5-311 series RMN: Z3ENN CPU info: $ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 model name : ARMv7 Processor rev 3 (v7l) BogoMIPS : 2.31 Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp thumbee neon vfpv3 tls vfpv4 idiva idivt vfpd32 lpae CPU implementer : 0x41 CPU architecture: 7 CPU variant : 0x3 CPU part : 0xc0f CPU revision : 3 Hardware : NVIDIA Tegra SoC (Flattened Device Tree) Revision : 0000 Serial : 000000000000...

...r for the right logs (and version-dissection findings) at the right time :) Jim Klimov On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:41?AM Juan Carlos Fischer < juancarlos.fischer at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Jim! > First of all, allow me to thank you for your time and invaluable help. > Exactly arm v7l are 32 bit. I will conduct several tests and keep you > informed. > > On the other hand this is what I got > pi at raspberrypi:~ $ sudo /lib/nut/usbhid-ups -DDDDDD -a Liebert > 0.000000 [D3] do_global_args: var='maxretry' val='3' > 0.001309 [D3] do_global_ar...

...r for the right logs (and version-dissection findings) at the right time :) Jim Klimov On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:41?AM Juan Carlos Fischer < juancarlos.fischer at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Jim! > First of all, allow me to thank you for your time and invaluable help. > Exactly arm v7l are 32 bit. I will conduct several tests and keep you > informed. > > On the other hand this is what I got > pi at raspberrypi:~ $ sudo /lib/nut/usbhid-ups -DDDDDD -a Liebert > 0.000000 [D3] do_global_args: var='maxretry' val='3' > 0.001309 [D3] do_global_ar...

...llon.com> wrote: >> How is this for a proposed solution? What if I add logic to >> llvm::ARM::getCanonicalArchName() that matches the trailing ‘l’ (or ‘b’) and >> treats it the same way that ‘el’ and ‘eb’ are now? This function would >> return v7 or v6 in the case of armv7l or armv6l, respectively (or, if it’s >> preferred, v7a or v6a). It seems like this is closer to the “correct” >> approach. It does show potentially inappropriate deference to Linux’s >> choice in the matter, but at least it’s not making sub-architectures that >> don’t exis...

>> Going back through SVN history, I cannot find any evidence that ARMv6L ever existed. > > Oh, my bad!! I was thinking of ARMv7l... :/ > > Nevertheless, I'll leave you guys to review this one, as I lost touch with the parser a while ago. Ah, I see: ARMv7L is now an alias for ARMv7A. So, if William has to add support for ARMv6L, I'd suggest he adds it as an alias, and not as an architecture variant. >&gt...

...lin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 5 January 2016 at 10:28, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >> That's rather a hack, given that the 'l' actually has semantic >> meaning, but I suppose I could live with it. > > Not really. I disagree. "armv7l" is created specifically by Linux appending a little-endian 'l' to an "armv7" base. It's much less common (because no-one cares about big-endian), but "armv7b" also exists. As do "armv6l", "armv6b" and probably "armv8" equivalents t...

...ba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 22/10/2019 22:18, Timothy Brewer via samba wrote: > > Like so many others, I'm having NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE issues. I've > tried > > all the fixes I could find to no avail. > > My environment: Cent 7 (Linux 4.19.72-v7l.1.el7) with Samba 4.9.1, bound > > to AD via Realmd. SSSD for ACL's, winbind for user map. > > Sorry but from Samba 4.8.0 the use of sssd with winbind is not > supported, this is because from 4.8.0 you must run winbind if using > 'security = ADS' and the two interfere...

...LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/2003-01-04-ArgumentBug.ll LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/pr13727.ll LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/test-common-symbols.ll LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/test-fp-no-external-funcs.ll LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/test-fp.ll I configure with: --build=armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf --host=armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf --target=armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=neon --with-float=hard --enable-optimized $ cat /proc/cpuinfo Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l) processor : 0 BogoMIPS : 1992.29 processor...